Literature DB >> 31462579

Communicating about chemicals in cigarette smoke: impact on knowledge and misunderstanding.

Allison J Lazard1,2, M Justin Byron2,3,4, Ellen Peters5, Noel T Brewer6,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The USA must publicly share information about harmful and potentially harmful constituents (chemicals) in tobacco products. We sought to understand whether webpages with chemical information are "understandable and not misleading to a lay person."
METHODS: Participants were a national probability sample of US adults and adolescents (n=1441, 18% smokers). In an online experiment, we randomly assigned participants to view one of the developed webpages (chemical names only, names with quantity ranges, names with visual risk indicators) or no webpage in phase one (between subjects). Participants completed a survey assessing knowledge, misunderstanding, perceived likelihood, perceived severity of health effects from smoking and quit intentions (smokers only). In phase two (within subjects), participants viewed all three webpage formats and reported webpage perceptions (clarity, usability, usefulness) and perceived impact (affect, elaboration, perceived effectiveness).
RESULTS: In phase one, viewing any webpage led to more knowledge of chemicals (48%-54% vs 28% no webpage, ps<0.001) and health harms (77% vs 67% no webpage, ps<0.001). When exposed to any webpage, 5%-23% endorsed misunderstandings that some cigarettes are safer than others. Webpage format did not affect knowledge or reduce misunderstandings. Viewing any webpage led to higher perceived likelihood of experiencing health effects from smoking (p<0.001) and, among smokers, greater intentions to quit smoking (p=0.04). In phase two, where participants viewed all formats, a visual risk indicator led to the highest perceived impact.
CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of chemicals and health effects can increase after viewing a website. Yet, websites may not correct the misunderstanding that some cigarettes are safer. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carcinogens; media; public opinion

Year:  2019        PMID: 31462579      PMCID: PMC8176391          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  34 in total

1.  Consumer understanding of cigarette emission labelling.

Authors:  Karine Gallopel-Morvan; Crawford Moodie; David Hammond; Figen Eker; Emmanuelle Beguinot; Yves Martinet
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  "My First Thought was Croutons": Perceptions of Cigarettes and Cigarette Smoke Constituents Among Adult Smokers and Nonsmokers.

Authors:  Kathryn E Moracco; Jennifer C Morgan; Jennifer Mendel; Randall Teal; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl; Marissa G Hall; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Numeracy and decision making.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Daniel Västfjäll; Paul Slovic; C K Mertz; Ketti Mazzocco; Stephan Dickert
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-05

4.  Does Adding Information on Toxic Constituents to Cigarette Pack Warnings Increase Smokers' Perceptions About the Health Risks of Smoking? A Longitudinal Study in Australia, Canada, Mexico, and the United States.

Authors:  Yoo Jin Cho; James F Thrasher; Kamala Swayampakala; Isaac Lipkus; David Hammond; Kenneth Michael Cummings; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; James W Hardin
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2017-07-17

5.  Improper disclosure: tobacco packaging and emission labelling regulations.

Authors:  D Hammond; C M White
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 2.427

Review 6.  How people think about the chemicals in cigarette smoke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer C Morgan; M Justin Byron; Sabeeh A Baig; Irina Stepanov; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-02-21

7.  Carcinogen exposure during short-term switching from regular to "light" cigarettes.

Authors:  Neal L Benowitz; Peyton Jacob; John T Bernert; Margaret Wilson; Langing Wang; Faith Allen; Delia Dempsey
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Brand switching and toxic chemicals in cigarette smoke: A national study.

Authors:  Jennifer R Mendel; Sabeeh A Baig; Marissa G Hall; Michelle Jeong; M Justin Byron; Jennifer C Morgan; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Understanding how perceptions of tobacco constituents and the FDA relate to effective and credible tobacco risk messaging: A national phone survey of U.S. adults, 2014-2015.

Authors:  Marcella H Boynton; Robert P Agans; J Michael Bowling; Noel T Brewer; Erin L Sutfin; Adam O Goldstein; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Effective Formats for Communicating Risks from Cigarette Smoke Chemicals.

Authors:  M Justin Byron; Allison J Lazard; Ellen Peters; Huyen Vu; Annie Schmidt; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2018-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  Design cues for tobacco communication: Heuristic interpretations and usability of online health information about harmful chemicals.

Authors:  Allison J Lazard
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Pilot study to inform young adults about the risks of electronic cigarettes through text messaging.

Authors:  Karen S Calabro; Georges E Khalil; Minxing Chen; Cheryl L Perry; Alexander V Prokhorov
Journal:  Addict Behav Rep       Date:  2019-10-16

3.  Effect of Cigarette Constituent Messages With Engagement Text on Intention to Quit Smoking Among Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Adam O Goldstein; Kristen L Jarman; Sarah D Kowitt; Tara L Queen; Kyung Su Kim; Bonnie E Shook-Sa; Paschal Sheeran; Seth M Noar; Leah M Ranney
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.