Literature DB >> 24996630

Open-Identity Sperm Donation: How Does Offering Donor-Identifying Information Relate to Donor-Conceived Offspring's Wishes and Needs?

An Ravelingien1, Veerle Provoost2, Guido Pennings3.   

Abstract

Over the past years, a growing number of countries have legislated open-identity donation, in which donor-conceived offspring are given access to the donor's identity once the child has reached maturity. It is held that donor anonymity creates identity problems for such children similar to the "genealogical bewilderment" described within the adoption context. The study of the social and psychological effects of open-identity donation is still very much in its infancy, but what has been left unquestioned is whether (and to what extent) offering access to the donor's name and address is an adequate response to such effects. This study has two goals: First, we aim to provide a systematic review of the reasons why donor-conceived (DC) offspring want to know the identity of their sperm donor. Second, we examine to what extent the provision of donor-identifying information can satisfy the reasons mentioned. The most important motivations appear to be: (1) to avoid medical risks and consanguineous relationships; (2) to satisfy curiosity; (3) to learn more about the self or to complete one's identity; (4) to learn more about what kind of person the donor is (biographical information, why he donated, etc.); (5) to form a relationship with the donor and/or his family; and (6) to learn about one's ancestry/genealogy. Our analysis shows that for nearly all of these reasons access to the donor's identity is not necessary. In those cases where it is, moreover, donor identification is not sufficient. What is really needed is (extended) contact with the donor, rather than the mere provision of his name.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Donor conception; Donor searching; Donor-conceived offspring; Identity; Open-identity donation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24996630     DOI: 10.1007/s11673-014-9550-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  19 in total

1.  GENEALOGICAL BEWILDERMENT IN CHILDREN WITH SUBSTITUTE PARENTS.

Authors:  H J SANTS
Journal:  Br J Med Psychol       Date:  1964

2.  Offspring searching for their sperm donors: how family type shapes the process.

Authors:  D R Beeson; P K Jennings; W Kramer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Making sense of child welfare when regulating human reproductive technologies.

Authors:  John McMillan
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: an Australian perspective.

Authors:  I S Rodino; P J Burton; K A Sanders
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  Would 'all-inclusive' compensation attract more gamete donors to balance their loss of anonymity?

Authors:  Ian Craft; Alan Thornhill
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.828

6.  No reason for a reduction in the number of offspring per sperm donor because of possible transmission of autosomal dominant diseases.

Authors:  Pim M W Janssens
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: reports from 12-17 year olds.

Authors:  J E Scheib; M Riordan; S Rubin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Gamete donation and anonymity: should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents?

Authors:  A McWhinnie
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family type.

Authors:  Vasanti Jadva; Tabitha Freeman; Wendy Kramer; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Donor-conceived children looking for their sperm donor: what do they want to know?

Authors:  A Ravelingien; V Provoost; G Pennings
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2013
View more
  6 in total

1.  Open-Identity Sperm Donation: How Does Offering Donor-Identifying Information Relate to Donor-Conceived Offspring's Wishes and Needs?

Authors:  Marja Visser; Monique H Mochtar; Fulco van der Veen
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Narrative Identity in Third Party Reproduction: Normative Aspects and Ethical Challenges.

Authors:  Natacha Salomé Lima
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Donor Conception and "Passing," or; Why Australian Parents of Donor-Conceived Children Want Donors Who Look Like Them.

Authors:  Karen-Anne Wong
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 4.  Shifting to a model of donor conception that entails a communication agreement among the parents, donor, and offspring.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ishii; Iñigo de Miguel Beriain
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Defining Ourselves: Personal Bioinformation as a Tool of Narrative Self-Conception.

Authors:  Emily Postan
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  Sperm donor regulation and disclosure intentions: Results from a nationwide multi-centre study in France.

Authors:  N Kalampalikis; M Doumergue; S Zadeh
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2018-03-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.