Literature DB >> 9662297

The disclosure decision: concerns and issues of parents of children conceived through donor insemination.

R D Nachtigall1, G Becker, S S Quiroga, J M Tschann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to examine the disclosure decision by parents of children conceived by donor insemination. STUDY
DESIGN: A qualitative component of a self-administered questionnaire mailed to 184 couples who had become parents by donor insemination encouraged respondents to volunteer their written comments, concerns, or opinions about their disclosure decision.
RESULTS: A total of 70 men and 86 women submitted written comments indicating that 54% did not plan to disclose the donor insemination treatment (nondisclosers), 30% indicated they would (disclosers), and 16% remained undecided. The only significant relationship between the disclosure decision and expressed concern was with regard to confidentiality and honesty (chi2 = 99.9, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Whether parents viewed the disclosure issue as one of honesty (disclosers) or confidentiality (nondisclosers) was the major determinant in the decision of whether to tell children about their donor insemination origin. There was no association between disclosure status or gender and expressed concerns about parenting, children, or family relations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9662297     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70318-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  11 in total

1.  What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Paul Schotsmans; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2004

2.  Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: an overview of the psychosocial evidence.

Authors:  Tabitha Freeman
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-03

3.  Strategies for disclosure: how parents approach telling their children that they were conceived with donor gametes.

Authors:  Kirstin Mac Dougall; Gay Becker; Joanna E Scheib; Robert D Nachtigall
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Narrative Identity in Third Party Reproduction: Normative Aspects and Ethical Challenges.

Authors:  Natacha Salomé Lima
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 1.352

5.  Children conceived by gamete donation: psychological adjustment and mother-child relationships at age 7.

Authors:  Susan Golombok; Jennifer Readings; Lucy Blake; Polly Casey; Laura Mellish; Alex Marks; Vasanti Jadva
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2011-04

6.  Disclosure decisions among pregnant women who received donor oocytes: a phenomenological study.

Authors:  Patricia Hershberger; Susan C Klock; Randall B Barnes
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Donor Conception Disclosure: Directive or Non-Directive Counselling?

Authors:  Inez Raes; An Ravelingien; Guido Pennings
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 1.352

8.  Children born through reproductive donation: a longitudinal study of psychological adjustment.

Authors:  Susan Golombok; Lucy Blake; Polly Casey; Gabriela Roman; Vasanti Jadva
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 9.  Counselling on disclosure of gamete donation to donor offspring:a search for facts.

Authors:  M Visser; P A L Kop; M van Wely; F van der Veen; G J E Gerrits; M C B van Zwieten
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

10.  Disclosure of sperm donation: a comparison between solo mother and two-parent families with identifiable donors.

Authors:  Tabitha Freeman; Sophie Zadeh; Venessa Smith; Susan Golombok
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 3.828

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.