Literature DB >> 29988079

Navigating the nuances of clinical sequence variant interpretation in Mendelian disease.

Natasha T Strande1, Sarah E Brnich2, Tamara S Roman2, Jonathan S Berg3.   

Abstract

Understanding clinical genetic test results in the era of next-generation sequencing has become increasingly complex, necessitating clear and thorough guidelines for sequence variant interpretation. To meet this need the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) published guidelines for a systematic approach for sequence variant interpretation in 2015. This framework is intended to be adaptable to any Mendelian condition, promoting transparency and consistency in variant interpretation, yet its comprehensive nature yields important challenges and caveats that end users must understand. In this review, we address some of these nuances and discuss the evolving efforts to refine and adapt this framework. We also consider the added complexity of distinguishing between variant-level interpretations and case-level conclusions, particularly in the context of the large gene panel approach to clinical diagnostics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACMG laboratory guideline; Clinical genetic testing; Clinical interpretation; Variant classification; Variant interpretation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29988079      PMCID: PMC6679919          DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0100-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  72 in total

1.  Against all odds: blended phenotypes of three single-gene defects.

Authors:  Yong Li; Anika Salfelder; Karl Otfried Schwab; Sarah Catharina Grünert; Tanja Velten; Dieter Lütjohann; Pablo Villavicencio-Lorini; Uta Matysiak-Scholze; Bernhard Zabel; Anna Köttgen; Ekkehart Lausch
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Expanding the Phenotypic and Genotypic Landscape of Autoimmune Polyendocrine Syndrome Type 1.

Authors:  Elizaveta M Orlova; Leila S Sozaeva; Maria A Kareva; Bergithe E Oftedal; Anette S B Wolff; Lars Breivik; Ekaterina Y Zakharova; Olga N Ivanova; Olle Kämpe; Ivan I Dedov; Per M Knappskog; Valentina A Peterkova; Eystein S Husebye
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Variant Interpretation: Functional Assays to the Rescue.

Authors:  Lea M Starita; Nadav Ahituv; Maitreya J Dunham; Jacob O Kitzman; Frederick P Roth; Georg Seelig; Jay Shendure; Douglas M Fowler
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Marked yield of re-evaluating phenotype and exome/target sequencing data in 33 individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  Bing Xiao; Wenjuan Qiu; Xing Ji; Xiaoqing Liu; Zhuo Huang; Huili Liu; Yanjie Fan; Yan Xu; Yu Liu; Hui Yie; Wei Wei; Hui Yan; Zhuwen Gong; Lixiao Shen; Yu Sun
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 5.  DNA repair-related functional assays for the classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants: a critical review and needs assessment.

Authors:  Amanda Ewart Toland; Paul R Andreassen
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Assessment of the predictive accuracy of five in silico prediction tools, alone or in combination, and two metaservers to classify long QT syndrome gene mutations.

Authors:  Ivone U S Leong; Alexander Stuckey; Daniel Lai; Jonathan R Skinner; Donald R Love
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.103

7.  Consistency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Classifications Among Clinical Diagnostic Laboratories.

Authors:  Stephen E Lincoln; Shan Yang; Melissa S Cline; Yuya Kobayashi; Can Zhang; Scott Topper; David Haussler; Benedict Paten; Robert L Nussbaum
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2017-04-11

8.  Pathogenic variant burden in the ExAC database: an empirical approach to evaluating population data for clinical variant interpretation.

Authors:  Yuya Kobayashi; Shan Yang; Keith Nykamp; John Garcia; Stephen E Lincoln; Scott E Topper
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 11.117

9.  Systematic reanalysis of clinical exome data yields additional diagnoses: implications for providers.

Authors:  Aaron M Wenger; Harendra Guturu; Jonathan A Bernstein; Gill Bejerano
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Exploring the importance of case-level clinical information for variant interpretation.

Authors:  Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  First Responder to Genomic Information: A Guide for Primary Care Providers.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Challenges in returning results in a genomic medicine implementation study: the Return of Actionable Variants Empirical (RAVE) study.

Authors:  David C Kochan; Erin Winkler; Noralane Lindor; Gabriel Q Shaibi; Janet Olson; Pedro J Caraballo; Robert Freimuth; Joel E Pacyna; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Richard R Sharp; Iftikhar J Kullo
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 8.617

3.  Overview of Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines.

Authors:  Steven M Harrison; Leslie G Biesecker; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2019-09

4.  Telomere biology disorder prevalence and phenotypes in adults with familial hematologic and/or pulmonary presentations.

Authors:  Simone Feurstein; Ayodeji Adegunsoye; Danijela Mojsilovic; Rekha Vij; Allison H West DePersia; Padma Sheila Rajagopal; Afaf Osman; Robert H Collins; Raymond H Kim; Steven D Gore; Peter Greenberg; Lucy A Godley; Zejuan Li; Daniela Del Gaudio; Hari Prasanna Subramanian; Soma Das; Tom Walsh; Suleyman Gulsuner; Jeremy P Segal; Aliya N Husain; Sandeep Gurbuxani; Mary-Claire King; Mary E Strek; Jane E Churpek
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-10-13

5.  Need for revision of the ACMG/AMP guidelines for interpretation of X-linked variants.

Authors:  Yoko Inoue; Osamu Machida; Yosuke Kita; Toshiyuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2022-08

6.  Referencing BRCA in hereditary cancer risk discussions: In search of an anchor in a sea of uncertainty.

Authors:  Margaret Waltz; Anya E R Prince; Julianne M O'Daniel; Ann Katherine M Foreman; Bradford C Powell; Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Data sharing to improve concordance in variant interpretation across laboratories: results from the Canadian Open Genetics Repository.

Authors:  Chloe Mighton; Amanda C Smith; Justin Mayers; Robert Tomaszewski; Sherryl Taylor; Stacey Hume; Ron Agatep; Elizabeth Spriggs; Harriet E Feilotter; Laura Semenuk; Henry Wong; Lorena Lazo de la Vega; Christian R Marshall; Michelle M Axford; Talia Silver; George S Charames; Vanessa Di Gioacchino; Nicholas Watkins; William D Foulkes; Marcos Clavier; Nancy Hamel; George Chong; Ryan E Lamont; Jillian Parboosingh; Aly Karsan; Ian Bosdet; Sean S Young; Tracy Tucker; Mohammad Reza Akbari; Marsha D Speevak; Andrea K Vaags; Matthew S Lebo; Jordan Lerner-Ellis
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 5.941

8.  Functional analysis of novel desert hedgehog gene variants improves the clinical interpretation of genomic data and provides a more accurate diagnosis for patients with 46,XY differences of sex development.

Authors:  Katie Ayers; Jocelyn van den Bergen; Gorjana Robevska; Nurin Listyasari; Jamal Raza; Irum Atta; Stefan Riedl; Karen Rothacker; Catherine Choong; Sultana M H Faradz; Andrew Sinclair
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 9.  Inherited Renal Tubulopathies-Challenges and Controversies.

Authors:  Daniela Iancu; Emma Ashton
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Challenges in returning results in a genomic medicine implementation study: the Return of Actionable Variants Empirical (RAVE) study.

Authors:  David C Kochan; Erin Winkler; Noralane Lindor; Gabriel Q Shaibi; Janet Olson; Pedro J Caraballo; Robert Freimuth; Joel E Pacyna; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Richard R Sharp; Iftikhar J Kullo
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 8.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.