Literature DB >> 21811163

Follow-up of carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of unknown significance: variant reclassification and surgical decisions.

Mitzi L Murray1, Felecia Cerrato, Robin L Bennett, Gail P Jarvik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: : Approximately 5-10% of patients who undergo genetic testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 receive a variant of unknown significance (VUS) result. The ambiguous nature of a VUS may increase difficulty in patient understanding and decision making regarding risk reduction and surveillance options, including cancer risk-reducing surgeries. VUS reclassification to benign or deleterious may occur in time; however, clinical decisions may need to be made expeditiously, and some patients may pursue irreversible treatments before VUS reclassification.
METHODS: : We reviewed the surgical decisions of 107 women postdisclosure of a BRCA VUS result counseled at our institute between 1998 and 2009.
CONCLUSION: : Among women receiving a BRCA VUS result at our center, 11 of 107 (10.3%) pursued cancer risk-reducing mastectomy and 22 of 107 (20.6%) pursued cancer risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Reclassification of VUS occurred up to 9 years after testing, and 5 of 22 (22.7%) women followed up for 8 or more years continue to have a VUS result. We discuss considerations for providers of genetic services to discuss with patients who receive a VUS result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21811163     DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318226fc15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  45 in total

1.  (Mis)treating the pharmacogenetic incidentalome.

Authors:  Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  A Multiplex Homology-Directed DNA Repair Assay Reveals the Impact of More Than 1,000 BRCA1 Missense Substitution Variants on Protein Function.

Authors:  Lea M Starita; Muhtadi M Islam; Tapahsama Banerjee; Aleksandra I Adamovich; Justin Gullingsrud; Stanley Fields; Jay Shendure; Jeffrey D Parvin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Genetic counselors' practices and confidence regarding variant of uncertain significance results and reclassification from BRCA testing.

Authors:  C L Scherr; N M Lindor; T L Malo; F J Couch; S T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 4.  Family-Specific Variants and the Limits of Human Genetics.

Authors:  Brian H Shirts; Colin C Pritchard; Tom Walsh
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 11.951

5.  DATA SHARING AND REPRODUCIBLE CLINICAL GENETIC TESTING: SUCCESSES AND CHALLENGES.

Authors:  Shan Yang; Melissa Cline; Can Zhang; Benedict Paten; Stephen E Lincoln
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2017

6.  Prospective Study of Cancer Genetic Variants: Variation in Rate of Reclassification by Ancestry.

Authors:  Thomas P Slavin; Lily R Van Tongeren; Carolyn E Behrendt; Ilana Solomon; Christina Rybak; Bita Nehoray; Lili Kuzmich; Mariana Niell-Swiller; Kathleen R Blazer; Shu Tao; Kai Yang; Julie O Culver; Sharon Sand; Danielle Castillo; Josef Herzog; Stacy W Gray; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Power of pedigree likelihood analysis in extended pedigrees to classify rare variants of uncertain significance in cancer risk genes.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Rosenthal; John Michael O Ranola; Brian H Shirts
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  A comparison of cosegregation analysis methods for the clinical setting.

Authors:  John Michael O Rañola; Quanhui Liu; Elisabeth A Rosenthal; Brian H Shirts
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 9.  Prostate cancer research: The next generation; report from the 2019 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy Meeting.

Authors:  Andrea K Miyahira; Adam Sharp; Leigh Ellis; Jennifer Jones; Salma Kaochar; H Benjamin Larman; David A Quigley; Huihui Ye; Jonathan W Simons; Kenneth J Pienta; Howard R Soule
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA testing: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress.

Authors:  J O Culver; C D Brinkerhoff; J Clague; K Yang; K E Singh; S R Sand; J N Weitzel
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.