Literature DB >> 29204945

D3R Grand Challenge 2: blind prediction of protein-ligand poses, affinity rankings, and relative binding free energies.

Zied Gaieb1, Shuai Liu1, Symon Gathiaka2, Michael Chiu1, Huanwang Yang3, Chenghua Shao3, Victoria A Feher1, W Patrick Walters4, Bernd Kuhn5, Markus G Rudolph5, Stephen K Burley3, Michael K Gilson6, Rommie E Amaro1.   

Abstract

The Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) ran Grand Challenge 2 (GC2) from September 2016 through February 2017. This challenge was based on a dataset of structures and affinities for the nuclear receptor farnesoid X receptor (FXR), contributed by F. Hoffmann-La Roche. The dataset contained 102 IC50 values, spanning six orders of magnitude, and 36 high-resolution co-crystal structures with representatives of four major ligand classes. Strong global participation was evident, with 49 participants submitting 262 prediction submission packages in total. Procedurally, GC2 mimicked Grand Challenge 2015 (GC2015), with a Stage 1 subchallenge testing ligand pose prediction methods and ranking and scoring methods, and a Stage 2 subchallenge testing only ligand ranking and scoring methods after the release of all blinded co-crystal structures. Two smaller curated sets of 18 and 15 ligands were developed to test alchemical free energy methods. This overview summarizes all aspects of GC2, including the dataset details, challenge procedures, and participant results. We also consider implications for progress in the field, while highlighting methodological areas that merit continued development. Similar to GC2015, the outcome of GC2 underscores the pressing need for methods development in pose prediction, particularly for ligand scaffolds not currently represented in the Protein Data Bank ( http://www.pdb.org ), and in affinity ranking and scoring of bound ligands.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alchemical methods; Blinded prediction challenge; D3R; Docking; Farnesoid X receptor; Ligand ranking; Scoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29204945      PMCID: PMC5767524          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-017-0088-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  42 in total

1.  Macromolecular TLS refinement in REFMAC at moderate resolutions.

Authors:  Martyn D Winn; Garib N Murshudov; Miroslav Z Papiz
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  On the role of the crystal environment in determining protein side-chain conformations.

Authors:  Matthew P Jacobson; Richard A Friesner; Zhexin Xiang; Barry Honig
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-07-12       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  The many roles of computation in drug discovery.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction.

Authors:  Matthew P Jacobson; David L Pincus; Chaya S Rapp; Tyler J F Day; Barry Honig; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

5.  Refinement of severely incomplete structures with maximum likelihood in BUSTER-TNT.

Authors:  E Blanc; P Roversi; C Vonrhein; C Flensburg; S M Lea; G Bricogne
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2004-11-26

6.  Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions.

Authors:  E Krissinel; K Henrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2004-11-26

7.  Endogenous bile acids are ligands for the nuclear receptor FXR/BAR.

Authors:  H Wang; J Chen; K Hollister; L C Sowers; B M Forman
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Identification of a nuclear receptor for bile acids.

Authors:  M Makishima; A Y Okamoto; J J Repa; H Tu; R M Learned; A Luk; M V Hull; K D Lustig; D J Mangelsdorf; B Shan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Bile acids: natural ligands for an orphan nuclear receptor.

Authors:  D J Parks; S G Blanchard; R K Bledsoe; G Chandra; T G Consler; S A Kliewer; J B Stimmel; T M Willson; A M Zavacki; D D Moore; J M Lehmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Molecular basis for feedback regulation of bile acid synthesis by nuclear receptors.

Authors:  T T Lu; M Makishima; J J Repa; K Schoonjans; T A Kerr; J Auwerx; D J Mangelsdorf
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  59 in total

1.  Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3.

Authors:  Xibing He; Viet H Man; Beihong Ji; Xiang-Qun Xie; Junmei Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Blinded prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity using Amber thermodynamic integration for the 2018 D3R grand challenge 4.

Authors:  Junjie Zou; Chuan Tian; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Absolute Free Energy of Binding Calculations for Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor in Complex with a Druglike Inhibitor.

Authors:  Yue Qian; Israel Cabeza de Vaca; Jonah Z Vilseck; Daniel J Cole; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Extensive benchmark of rDock as a peptide-protein docking tool.

Authors:  Daniel Soler; Yvonne Westermaier; Robert Soliva
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Improving ligand 3D shape similarity-based pose prediction with a continuum solvent model.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Creating a Virtual Assistant for Medicinal Chemistry.

Authors:  Lewis R Vidler; Matthew P Baumgartner
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  Hybrid receptor structure/ligand-based docking and activity prediction in ICM: development and evaluation in D3R Grand Challenge 3.

Authors:  Polo C-H Lam; Ruben Abagyan; Maxim Totrov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  D3R Grand Challenge 4: prospective pose prediction of BACE1 ligands with AutoDock-GPU.

Authors:  Diogo Santos-Martins; Jerome Eberhardt; Giulia Bianco; Leonardo Solis-Vasquez; Francesca Alessandra Ambrosio; Andreas Koch; Stefano Forli
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 10.  Impact of the Protein Data Bank on antineoplastic approvals.

Authors:  John D Westbrook; Rose Soskind; Brian P Hudson; Stephen K Burley
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 7.851

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.