Literature DB >> 31691920

D3R Grand Challenge 4: prospective pose prediction of BACE1 ligands with AutoDock-GPU.

Diogo Santos-Martins1, Jerome Eberhardt1, Giulia Bianco1, Leonardo Solis-Vasquez2, Francesca Alessandra Ambrosio1,3, Andreas Koch2, Stefano Forli4.   

Abstract

In this paper we describe our approaches to predict the binding mode of twenty BACE1 ligands as part of Grand Challenge 4 (GC4), organized by the Drug Design Data Resource. Calculations for all submissions (except for one, which used AutoDock4.2) were performed using AutoDock-GPU, the new GPU-accelerated version of AutoDock4 implemented in OpenCL, which features a gradient-based local search. The pose prediction challenge was organized in two stages. In Stage 1a, the protein conformations associated with each of the ligands were undisclosed, so we docked each ligand to a set of eleven receptor conformations, chosen to maximize the diversity of binding pocket topography. Protein conformations were made available in Stage 1b, making it a re-docking task. For all calculations, macrocyclic conformations were sampled on the fly during docking, taking the target structure into account. To leverage information from existing structures containing BACE1 bound to ligands available in the PDB, we tested biased docking and pose filter protocols to facilitate poses resembling those experimentally determined. Both pose filters and biased docking resulted in more accurate docked poses, enabling us to predict for both Stages 1a and 1b ligand poses within 2 Å RMSD from the crystallographic pose. Nevertheless, many of the ligands could be correctly docked without using existing structural information, demonstrating the usefulness of physics-based scoring functions, such as the one used in AutoDock4, for structure based drug design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AutoDock; D3R; Docking; Drug design data resource; Macrocycle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31691920      PMCID: PMC7325737          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-019-00241-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  23 in total

1.  A force field with discrete displaceable waters and desolvation entropy for hydrated ligand docking.

Authors:  Stefano Forli; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  A semiempirical free energy force field with charge-based desolvation.

Authors:  Ruth Huey; Garrett M Morris; Arthur J Olson; David S Goodsell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Principal component analysis of molecular dynamics: on the use of Cartesian vs. internal coordinates.

Authors:  Florian Sittel; Abhinav Jain; Gerhard Stock
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Flexibility of the flap in the active site of BACE1 as revealed by crystal structures and molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yechun Xu; Min-jun Li; Harry Greenblatt; Wuyan Chen; Aviv Paz; Orly Dym; Yoav Peleg; Tiantian Chen; Xu Shen; Jianhua He; Hualiang Jiang; Israel Silman; Joel L Sussman
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2011-12-09

5.  MDAnalysis: a toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Naveen Michaud-Agrawal; Elizabeth J Denning; Thomas B Woolf; Oliver Beckstein
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.

Authors:  Symon Gathiaka; Shuai Liu; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Jeanne A Stuckey; You Na Kang; Jim Delproposto; Ginger Kubish; James B Dunbar; Heather A Carlson; Stephen K Burley; W Patrick Walters; Rommie E Amaro; Victoria A Feher; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Oxicams bind in a novel mode to the cyclooxygenase active site via a two-water-mediated H-bonding Network.

Authors:  Shu Xu; Daniel J Hermanson; Surajit Banerjee; Kebreab Ghebreselasie; Gina M Clayton; R Michael Garavito; Lawrence J Marnett
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation.

Authors:  J M Word; S C Lovell; J S Richardson; D C Richardson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-01-29       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox.

Authors:  Noel M O'Boyle; Michael Banck; Craig A James; Chris Morley; Tim Vandermeersch; Geoffrey R Hutchison
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.514

10.  Prediction of homoprotein and heteroprotein complexes by protein docking and template-based modeling: A CASP-CAPRI experiment.

Authors:  Marc F Lensink; Sameer Velankar; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Shen-You Huang; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Andrej Sali; Joan Segura; Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes; Shruthi Viswanath; Ron Elber; Sergei Grudinin; Petr Popov; Emilie Neveu; Hasup Lee; Minkyung Baek; Sangwoo Park; Lim Heo; Gyu Rie Lee; Chaok Seok; Sanbo Qin; Huan-Xiang Zhou; David W Ritchie; Bernard Maigret; Marie-Dominique Devignes; Anisah Ghoorah; Mieczyslaw Torchala; Raphaël A G Chaleil; Paul A Bates; Efrat Ben-Zeev; Miriam Eisenstein; Surendra S Negi; Zhiping Weng; Thom Vreven; Brian G Pierce; Tyler M Borrman; Jinchao Yu; Françoise Ochsenbein; Raphaël Guerois; Anna Vangone; João P G L M Rodrigues; Gydo van Zundert; Mehdi Nellen; Li Xue; Ezgi Karaca; Adrien S J Melquiond; Koen Visscher; Panagiotis L Kastritis; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Xianjin Xu; Liming Qiu; Chengfei Yan; Jilong Li; Zhiwei Ma; Jianlin Cheng; Xiaoqin Zou; Yang Shen; Lenna X Peterson; Hyung-Rae Kim; Amit Roy; Xusi Han; Juan Esquivel-Rodriguez; Daisuke Kihara; Xiaofeng Yu; Neil J Bruce; Jonathan C Fuller; Rebecca C Wade; Ivan Anishchenko; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser; Kenichiro Imai; Kazunori Yamada; Toshiyuki Oda; Tsukasa Nakamura; Kentaro Tomii; Chiara Pallara; Miguel Romero-Durana; Brian Jiménez-García; Iain H Moal; Juan Férnandez-Recio; Jong Young Joung; Jong Yun Kim; Keehyoung Joo; Jooyoung Lee; Dima Kozakov; Sandor Vajda; Scott Mottarella; David R Hall; Dmitri Beglov; Artem Mamonov; Bing Xia; Tanggis Bohnuud; Carlos A Del Carpio; Eichiro Ichiishi; Nicholas Marze; Daisuke Kuroda; Shourya S Roy Burman; Jeffrey J Gray; Edrisse Chermak; Luigi Cavallo; Romina Oliva; Andrey Tovchigrechko; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-06-01
View more
  5 in total

1.  Benchmarking the Performance of Irregular Computations in AutoDock-GPU Molecular Docking.

Authors:  Leonardo Solis-Vasquez; Andreas F Tillack; Diogo Santos-Martins; Andreas Koch; Scott LeGrand; Stefano Forli
Journal:  Parallel Comput       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 0.986

2.  Supercomputing Pipelines Search for Therapeutics Against COVID-19.

Authors:  Josh Vincent Vermaas; Ada Sedova; Matthew B Baker; Swen Boehm; David M Rogers; Jeff Larkin; Jens Glaser; Micholas D Smith; Oscar Hernandez; Jeremy C Smith
Journal:  Comput Sci Eng       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.152

3.  Accelerating AutoDock Vina with GPUs.

Authors:  Shidi Tang; Ruiqi Chen; Mengru Lin; Qingde Lin; Yanxiang Zhu; Ji Ding; Haifeng Hu; Ming Ling; Jiansheng Wu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  The AutoDock suite at 30.

Authors:  David S Goodsell; Michel F Sanner; Arthur J Olson; Stefano Forli
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Accelerating AutoDock4 with GPUs and Gradient-Based Local Search.

Authors:  Diogo Santos-Martins; Leonardo Solis-Vasquez; Andreas F Tillack; Michel F Sanner; Andreas Koch; Stefano Forli
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 6.006

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.