Yasuo Niki1, Takeo Nagura2, Katsuya Nagai1, Shu Kobayashi1, Kengo Harato1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Clinical Biomechanics, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan. nagura@z8.keio.jp.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Knee adduction moment (KAM) has been recognized as a good clinical surrogate for medial tibiofemoral joint loading and is associated with implant durability after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to examine the effects of joint line obliquity in kinematically aligned TKA (KA-TKA) on KAM during gait. METHODS: The study enrolled 21 knees from 18 patients who underwent cylindrical axis reference KA-TKA and a matched group of 21 knees from 18 patients who underwent mechanically aligned (MA)-TKA as controls. Gait analyses were performed the day before TKA and at an overall mean of 2.6 years postoperatively. First peak KAM and variables associated with frontal knee kinetics were determined and compared between groups. RESULTS: In KA-TKA, the proximal tibia was resected with 3.4° ± 1.5° of varus in relation to the mechanical axis, and the final femorotibial shaft axis was 176.7° ± 3.8° with KA-TKA and 174.4° ± 3.0° with MA-TKA. KAM was significantly smaller with KA-TKA than with MA-TKA (p < 0.032). Regarding variables affecting KAM, significant differences were evident between the two TKAs for knee adduction angle (p = 0.0021), lever arm (p = 0.028), and Δlever arm (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In KA-TKA, joint line obliquity reduced peak KAM during gait, despite slight varus limb alignment, and this reduced KAM in KA-TKA can tolerate constitutional varus alignment. In clinical settings, KA-TKA thus represents a promising technical option for patients with large coronal bowing of the shaft carrying a risk of increased KAM after TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: Knee adduction moment (KAM) has been recognized as a good clinical surrogate for medial tibiofemoral joint loading and is associated with implant durability after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to examine the effects of joint line obliquity in kinematically aligned TKA (KA-TKA) on KAM during gait. METHODS: The study enrolled 21 knees from 18 patients who underwent cylindrical axis reference KA-TKA and a matched group of 21 knees from 18 patients who underwent mechanically aligned (MA)-TKA as controls. Gait analyses were performed the day before TKA and at an overall mean of 2.6 years postoperatively. First peak KAM and variables associated with frontal knee kinetics were determined and compared between groups. RESULTS: In KA-TKA, the proximal tibia was resected with 3.4° ± 1.5° of varus in relation to the mechanical axis, and the final femorotibial shaft axis was 176.7° ± 3.8° with KA-TKA and 174.4° ± 3.0° with MA-TKA. KAM was significantly smaller with KA-TKA than with MA-TKA (p < 0.032). Regarding variables affecting KAM, significant differences were evident between the two TKAs for knee adduction angle (p = 0.0021), lever arm (p = 0.028), and Δlever arm (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In KA-TKA, joint line obliquity reduced peak KAM during gait, despite slight varus limb alignment, and this reduced KAM in KA-TKA can tolerate constitutional varus alignment. In clinical settings, KA-TKA thus represents a promising technical option for patients with large coronal bowing of the shaft carrying a risk of increased KAM after TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Entities:
Keywords:
Constitutional varus; Gait analysis; Joint line obliquity; Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty; Knee adduction moment
Authors: Donald G Eckhoff; Joel M Bach; Victor M Spitzer; Karl D Reinig; Michelle M Bagur; Todd H Baldini; Nicolas M P Flannery Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2005 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Pete B Shull; Rebecca Shultz; Amy Silder; Jason L Dragoo; Thor F Besier; Mark R Cutkosky; Scott L Delp Journal: J Biomech Date: 2012-11-10 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: M A Hunt; T B Birmingham; D Bryant; I Jones; J R Giffin; T R Jenkyn; A A Vandervoort Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Abigail E Niesen; Anna L Garverick; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2022-10-06 Impact factor: 4.114
Authors: Samuel J MacDessi; William Griffiths-Jones; Ian A Harris; Johan Bellemans; Darren B Chen Journal: Bone Joint J Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 5.082