Literature DB >> 17907211

Relationship between pain and medial knee joint loading in mild radiographic knee osteoarthritis.

Laura E Thorp1, Dale R Sumner, Markus A Wimmer, Joel A Block.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The relationship between knee pain and radiographic evidence of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is notoriously imperfect. In particular, conditions that distinguish individuals with symptoms from those with comparable radiographic involvement who remain asymptomatic are unclear. We investigated dynamic loading across the knee in individuals with mild radiographic OA who were distinguished by the presence or absence of knee pain.
METHODS: Subjects were recruited into 3 groups: symptomatic with a Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grade of 2 (n = 52), asymptomatic with a K/L grade of 2 (n = 19), and asymptomatic with a K/L grade of 0 or 1 (n = 37), the latter representing a normal comparator group. Dynamic knee loading was assessed with gait analysis, and both the peak external knee adduction moment and the knee adduction angular impulse were determined.
RESULTS: Peak knee adduction moment and knee adduction angular impulse were 19% and 30% higher, respectively, in symptomatic K/L grade 2 individuals than in asymptomatic individuals with the same radiographic grade (P < 0.05). Conversely, the asymptomatic K/L grade 2 group did not differ from the K/L grade 0-1 normal comparator group (P = 1.00).
CONCLUSION: Among individuals with mild radiographic knee OA (K/L grade 2), those who are symptomatic have significantly higher medial compartment loads than those who are asymptomatic, whereas those who are asymptomatic do not differ from normal controls (asymptomatic K/L grade 0 or 1). These findings suggest a biomechanical component to the distinction between asymptomatic and symptomatic radiographic OA, which may be pathophysiologically important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17907211     DOI: 10.1002/art.22991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  53 in total

1.  Gait asymmetries in unilateral symptomatic hip osteoarthritis and their association with radiographic severity and pain.

Authors:  Gary J Farkas; Bryan R Schlink; Louis F Fogg; Kharma C Foucher; Markus A Wimmer; Najia Shakoor
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 2.  Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: Part I.

Authors:  Behzad Heidari
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2011

3.  Medial plica in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a histomorphological study.

Authors:  Shaw-Ruey Lyu; Jui-Kun Chiang; Chih-En Tseng
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Future directions in painful knee osteoarthritis: harnessing complexity in a heterogeneous population.

Authors:  Andrew J Kittelson; Steven Z George; Katrina S Maluf; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-10-31

5.  Are joint structure and function related to medial knee OA pain? A pilot study.

Authors:  Rebecca Avrin Zifchock; Yatin Kirane; Howard Hillstrom
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Treatment of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis by arthroscopic 'L' medial release procedure.

Authors:  Lin-Min Yang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Gait modification to treat knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-12-28

8.  What predicts the first peak of the knee adduction moment?

Authors:  Anne Schmitz; Brian Noehren
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  The biomechanics of osteoarthritis: implications for therapy.

Authors:  Joel A Block; Najia Shakoor
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  Effective gait patterns for offloading the medial compartment of the knee.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly; Darryl D D'Lima; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.