Literature DB >> 2920337

Relation of family physician or specialist care to obstetric interventions and outcomes in patients at low risk: a western Canadian cohort study.

E H Krikke1, N R Bell.   

Abstract

To determine the relation of family physician or specialist care to intrapartum interventions and outcomes, we carried out a historical cohort study of 1456 obstetric patients at low risk admitted between Nov. 15, 1984, and Mar. 15, 1986, to a western Canadian teaching hospital. The patients were classified as being at low risk on admission by means of chart review. Family physicians and specialists were found to have similar rates for most of the interventions measured, although the interventions for which significantly different rates were found suggest a less interventionist style of intrapartum care by family physicians. There were no significant differences in maternal or neonatal outcomes except for a higher proportion of infants weighing less than 2500 g among primigravid women cared for by family physicians compared with those under the care of specialists. Self-selection of physician specialty by patients resulted in differences in the demographic characteristics of the two patient populations. The findings support the continued involvement of family physicians in the provision of obstetric care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2920337      PMCID: PMC1268753     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  33 in total

1.  The general practitioner's role in the management of labour.

Authors:  P Curzen; U M Mountrose
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-12-11

2.  Critical appraisal of domiciliary obstetric and neonatal practice.

Authors:  C A Cox; S S Fox; P M Zinkin; A E Matthews
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-01-10

3.  An analysis of 3,199 patients booked for delivery in general-practitioner obstetric units.

Authors:  G A Richmond
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1977-07

4.  Obstetric audit in general practice.

Authors:  G N Marsh
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-10-15

5.  Outcome of women booked into an isolated general practice maternity unit over eight years.

Authors:  T Garrett; W House; S W Lowe
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-11

6.  Obstetrics and the family physician: changing situations.

Authors:  J Fry
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Proceedings: Obstetrics and family practice--conflict in medical education. A Canadian perspective.

Authors:  R P Beck
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 0.142

8.  Is any pregnancy low risk?

Authors:  R W Wilson; B S Schifrin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Obstetrical care in a prepaid cooperative: a comparison between family practice residents, family physicians, and obstetricians.

Authors:  M J Wanderer; J G Suyehira
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  Audit of obstetrical care and outcome in family medicine, obstetrics, and general practice.

Authors:  W R Phillips; G A Rice; R H Layton
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  10 in total

1.  Exploring family physicians' reasons to continue or discontinue providing intrapartum care: Qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Marion Dove; Maman Joyce Dogba; Charo Rodríguez
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Satisfaction with obstetric care. Patient survey in a family practice shared-call group.

Authors:  J L Shapiro
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Intracutaneous sterile water for back pain in labour.

Authors:  J L Reynolds
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Low-Risk Deliveries: A Comparison of Midwives, Family Physicians and Obstetricians.

Authors:  Dylan Walters; Archna Gupta; Austin E Nam; Jennifer Lake; Frank Martino; Peter C Coyte
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-08

5.  Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State.

Authors:  L McKenzie; P A Stephenson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Factors influencing the practice of vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  G Goldman; R Pineault; L Potvin; R Blais; H Bilodeau
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The unit of analysis error in studies about physicians' patient care behavior.

Authors:  G W Divine; J T Brown; L M Frazier
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Family medicine in a tertiary care hospital. Obstetrical outcomes and interventions.

Authors:  D Gaspar; J Jordan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Family practice obstetrics in a teaching hospital. Does a tertiary care environment make a difference?

Authors:  J M Jordan; D Gaspar
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Family practice obstetrics in a community hospital.

Authors:  N A Radomsky
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.275

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.