Literature DB >> 7420036

Obstetrical care in a prepaid cooperative: a comparison between family practice residents, family physicians, and obstetricians.

M J Wanderer, J G Suyehira.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the obstetrical care provided by three different groups of physicians. Deliveries between July 1975 and July 1977 were tabulated and all 211 deliveries of the family physician (FP) group, and all 199 of the family practice residency (FPR) group were reviewed, as were a randomly selected group of 193 obstetrician (OB) deliveries. All hospital charts were reviewed for 81 variables. The FPR group had more patients who were poor, single, and nulliparous. They presented later in pregnancy, were more often anemic, and had an increased incidence of venereal disease. The FPR and FP groups documented major psychological problems and depression more frequently. The obstetricians used caudal and epidural anesthesia more frequently, whereas the FP and FPR groups used more narcotics. Except for an increased incidence of third degree lacerations in the FP group, total maternal and fetal complications were few and similarly divided among the groups. The FPR and FP groups delivered 78 percent and the OB group 38 percent of their own patients. This paper is an addition to a limited literature base which deals with process and outcome of obstetrical care delivered by various provider groups and is unique in that the study was undertaken in a large prepaid group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7420036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  13 in total

1.  Provider distribution and variations in statewide cesarean section rates.

Authors:  W J Hueston; S Lewis-Stevenson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2001-02

2.  Who Will Deliver Canada's Babies in the 1990s?

Authors:  W W Rosser; H Muggah
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Referral pattern and rate of intervention in a small rural obstetrical practice.

Authors:  J Lemelin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Midwifery in a family practice.

Authors:  A J Reid; J G Galbraith
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Topics for family medicine research in obstetrics.

Authors:  W E Hogg; N Calonge
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Differences in intrapartum obstetric care provided to women at low risk by family physicians and obstetricians.

Authors:  A J Reid; J C Carroll; J Ruderman; M A Murray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  The case for small rural hospital obstetrics.

Authors:  W Hogg; J Lemelin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  The canadian family practice accoucheur.

Authors:  M Klein
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Relation of family physician or specialist care to obstetric interventions and outcomes in patients at low risk: a western Canadian cohort study.

Authors:  E H Krikke; N R Bell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; S A Dobie; L G Hart; R Schneeweiss; D Gould; T R Raine; T J Benedetti; M J Pirani; E B Perrin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.