Literature DB >> 10099804

Satisfaction with obstetric care. Patient survey in a family practice shared-call group.

J L Shapiro1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine patients' satisfaction with their obstetric care in a family medicine shared-call group.
DESIGN: A survey was given to a convenience sample of patients who came to see their doctors over a 6-week period.
SETTING: Brameast Family Practice in Brampton, Ont, where eight doctors participate in a shared obstetrics call group with 16 other physicians, each taking call 1 day in 23 days. PARTICIPANTS: Mothers in the practice who had delivered in the previous 8 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic data, interventions during delivery, and satisfaction ratings.
RESULTS: Of the 70% of women who responded, 96% were delivered by a doctor other than their own. Eighty-eight percent of these women were satisfied with their medical care at delivery and 96% were satisfied with their prenatal care. Nearly 79% said they would choose this shared-call group again.
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated a high level of patient satisfaction with obstetric care, despite the fact that most patients were delivered by a doctor other than their own. Family practice groups sharing obstetric call offer a feasible alternative for physicians who wish to avoid the interference with lifestyle and office appointments that practising obstetrics usually entails.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10099804      PMCID: PMC2328409     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  18 in total

1.  The Family Doctor in Obstetrics: Who's Looking after the Shop?

Authors:  S T Bain; I Grava-Gubins; R Edney
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Who Will Deliver Canada's Babies in the 1990s?

Authors:  W W Rosser; H Muggah
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Shared antenatal care: an improved paradigm for women's health care.

Authors:  W L Larimore
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 4.  Twenty-five years of obstetric patient satisfaction in North America: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Wilcock; L Kobayashi; I Murray
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.638

5.  Obstetrical practice after a family medicine residency.

Authors:  D Buckle
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Patient satisfaction with obstetric care.

Authors:  S Zweig; J Kruse; M LeFevre
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  A comparison of family physicians' and obstetricians' intrapartum management of low-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  S E MacDonald; K Voaklander; R V Birtwhistle
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Relation of family physician or specialist care to obstetric interventions and outcomes in patients at low risk: a western Canadian cohort study.

Authors:  E H Krikke; N R Bell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Provider continuity and quality of medical care. A retrospective analysis of prenatal and perinatal outcome.

Authors:  C L Shear; B T Gipe; J K Mattheis; M R Levy
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 10.  The effectiveness of family practice maternity care. A cross-cultural and environmental view.

Authors:  M Klein
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.907

View more
  8 in total

1.  Decreasing physician burnout.

Authors:  J M Szul
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Maternity care report. Janus Project: family physicians meeting the needs of tomorrow's society.

Authors:  Tony Reid; Inese Grava-Gubins; June C Carroll
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Duty to deliver: producing more family medicine graduates who practise obstetrics.

Authors:  Susan MacDonald
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Family medicine obstetrics. Collaborative interdisciplinary program for a declining resource.

Authors:  David Price; Michelle Howard; Elizabeth Shaw; Joyce Zazulak; Heather Waters; David Chan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Does having cesarean section capability make a difference to a small rural maternity service?

Authors:  Nancy Lynch; Harvey Thommasen; Nancy Anderson; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Family physicians in maternity care. Still in the game? Report from the CFPC's Janus Project.

Authors:  A J Reid; I Grava-Gubins; J C Carroll
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Is attending birth dying out? Trends in obstetric care provision among primary care physicians in British Columbia.

Authors:  Lindsay Hedden; Sarah Munro; Kimberlyn M McGrail; Michael R Law; Ivy L Bourgeault; Morris L Barer
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Family practice versus specialist care for low-risk obstetrics: examining patient satisfaction in Newfoundland and Labrador.

Authors:  Monica Kidd; Susan Avery; Norah Duggan; Jennifer McPhail
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.275

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.