Nicola Krähenbühl1, Maxwell W Weinberg1, Nathan P Davidson1, Megan K Mills2, Beat Hintermann3, Charles L Saltzman1, Alexej Barg4. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. 2. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, 30 N. 1900 E. No. 1A071, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. 3. Department of Orthopaedics, Kantonsspital Baselland, Rheinstrasse 26, 4410, Liestal, Switzerland. 4. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. alexej.barg@hsc.utah.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To give a systematic overview of current diagnostic imaging options for assessment of the distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search across the following sources was performed: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and SpringerLink. Forty-two articles were included and subdivided into three groups: group one consists of studies using conventional radiographs (22 articles), group two includes studies using computed tomography (CT) scans (15 articles), and group three comprises studies using magnet resonance imaging (MRI, 9 articles).The following data were extracted: imaging modality, measurement method, number of participants and ankles included, average age of participants, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the measurement technique. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the methodological quality. RESULTS: The three most common techniques used for assessment of the syndesmosis in conventional radiographs are the tibio-fibular clear space (TFCS), the tibio-fibular overlap (TFO), and the medial clear space (MCS). Regarding CT scans, the tibio-fibular width (axial images) was most commonly used. Most of the MRI studies used direct assessment of syndesmotic integrity. Overall, the included studies show low probability of bias and are applicable in daily practice. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional radiographs cannot predict syndesmotic injuries reliably. CT scans outperform plain radiographs in detecting syndesmotic mal-reduction. Additionally, the syndesmotic interval can be assessed in greater detail by CT. MRI measurements achieve a sensitivity and specificity of nearly 100%; however, correlating MRI findings with patients' complaints is difficult, and utility with subtle syndesmotic instability needs further investigation. Overall, the methodological quality of these studies was satisfactory.
OBJECTIVES: To give a systematic overview of current diagnostic imaging options for assessment of the distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search across the following sources was performed: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and SpringerLink. Forty-two articles were included and subdivided into three groups: group one consists of studies using conventional radiographs (22 articles), group two includes studies using computed tomography (CT) scans (15 articles), and group three comprises studies using magnet resonance imaging (MRI, 9 articles).The following data were extracted: imaging modality, measurement method, number of participants and ankles included, average age of participants, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the measurement technique. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the methodological quality. RESULTS: The three most common techniques used for assessment of the syndesmosis in conventional radiographs are the tibio-fibular clear space (TFCS), the tibio-fibular overlap (TFO), and the medial clear space (MCS). Regarding CT scans, the tibio-fibular width (axial images) was most commonly used. Most of the MRI studies used direct assessment of syndesmotic integrity. Overall, the included studies show low probability of bias and are applicable in daily practice. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional radiographs cannot predict syndesmotic injuries reliably. CT scans outperform plain radiographs in detecting syndesmotic mal-reduction. Additionally, the syndesmotic interval can be assessed in greater detail by CT. MRI measurements achieve a sensitivity and specificity of nearly 100%; however, correlating MRI findings with patients' complaints is difficult, and utility with subtle syndesmotic instability needs further investigation. Overall, the methodological quality of these studies was satisfactory.
Authors: Bernard Mengiardi; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Patrick Vienne; Juerg Hodler; Marco Zanetti Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-01-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Michael J Gardner; Demetris Demetrakopoulos; Stephen M Briggs; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich Journal: Foot Ankle Int Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 2.827
Authors: Nicola Krähenbühl; Travis L Bailey; Angela P Presson; Chelsea McCarty Allen; Heath B Henninger; Charles L Saltzman; Alexej Barg Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Manuel Mutschler; Jan-Hendrik Naendrup; Thomas R Pfeiffer; Vera Jaecker; Dariusch Arbab; Sven Shafizadeh; Tomas Buchhorn Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: N C Hagemeijer; B Lubberts; J Saengsin; R Bhimani; G Sato; G R Waryasz; G M M J Kerkhoffs; C W DiGiovanni; D Guss Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2022-07-26 Impact factor: 4.114
Authors: Bart Lubberts; Daniel Guss; Bryan G Vopat; Anne H Johnson; C Niek van Dijk; Hang Lee; Christopher W DiGiovanni Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: João Carlos Rodrigues; Alexandre Leme Godoy Santos; Marcelo Pires Prado; José Felipe Marion Alloza; Renato Amaral Masagão; Laercio Alberto Rosemberg; Durval do Carmo Santos Barros; Adham do Amaral E Castro; Marco Kawamura Demange; Mario Lenza; Mario Ferretti Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 2.692