Literature DB >> 33830524

Volume measurements on weightbearing computed tomography can detect subtle syndesmotic instability.

Soheil Ashkani Esfahani1, Rohan Bhimani1, Bart Lubberts1, Gino M Kerkhoffs2, Gregory Waryasz1,3,4, Christopher W DiGiovanni1,3,4, Daniel Guss1,3,4.   

Abstract

While weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) allows three-dimensional (3D) visualization of the distal syndesmosis, image interpretation has largely relied on one-dimensional (1D) distance and, more recently, two-dimensional (2D) area measurements. This study aimed to (1) determine the sensitivity and specificity of 2D area and 3D volume WBCT measurements towards detecting subtle syndesmotic instability, (2) evaluate whether the patterns of changes in the 3D shape of the syndesmosis can be attributed to the type of ligament injury. A total of 24 patients with unilateral subtle syndesmotic instability and 24 individuals with uninjured ankles (controls) with bilateral ankle WBCT were assessed retrospectively. First, 2D areas at 0, 1, 3, 5, and 10 cm, and 3D volumes at 1, 3, 5, and 10 cm above the tibial plafond were measured bilaterally. Secondly, the 3D model of the distal tibiofibular space was created based on WBCT in a subset of 8 out of 24 patients in whom the type of ligament injury was recognized via magnetic resonance imaging. The 3D model of the injured side was superimposed on the uninjured contralateral side to visualize the pattern of changes in different planes. Volume measurement up to 5 cm above the tibial plafond showed the lowest p-value (<0.001 vs. other methods), higher sensitivity (95.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 87.8-100), and specificity (83.3%, 95% CI: 68.4-98.2) for detection of syndesmotic instability. No specific pattern of changes in the 3D shape could be attributed to a type of ligament rupture. We suggest 3D volume measurements, best measured up to 5 cm proximal to the plafond, as a promising means of diagnosing syndesmotic instability, particularly for subtle cases that are hard to detect. Clinical significance: The ability to compare the ankle joints bilaterally in a 3D manner under physiologic weight provided by weightbearing CT has led to a more accurate diagnostic method. Using volumetric measurement up to 5 cm above the tibial plafond showed higher sensitivity and specificity for recognizing an unstable syndesmosis, especially in subtle cases. However, our preliminary investigations showed that the pattern of 3D alterations in the distal tibiofibular joint space based on WBCT images does not indicate the type of syndesmotic ligamentous injury. Our results can also help image viewing programs to improve their measurement tools to facilitate 3D measurement for the syndesmosis as well as other conditions that may benefit from 3D evaluation of the clinical images.
© 2021 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; image interpretation; sensitivity; specificity; stress imaging; syndesmosis; weightbearing CT

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33830524      PMCID: PMC8497639          DOI: 10.1002/jor.25049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  19 in total

Review 1.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  Imaging in syndesmotic injury: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Nicola Krähenbühl; Maxwell W Weinberg; Nathan P Davidson; Megan K Mills; Beat Hintermann; Charles L Saltzman; Alexej Barg
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: the Bonferroni vs Holm methods.

Authors:  M Aickin; H Gensler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The effects of weight bearing on the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: A study comparing weight bearing-CT with conventional CT.

Authors:  Karan Malhotra; Matthew Welck; Nicholas Cullen; Dishan Singh; Andrew J Goldberg
Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.705

5.  Role of the Deltoid Ligament in Syndesmotic Instability.

Authors:  Jafet Massri-Pugin; Bart Lubberts; Bryan G Vopat; Jonathon C Wolf; Christopher W DiGiovanni; Daniel Guss
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  Syndesmotic stability: Is there a radiological normal?-A systematic review.

Authors:  A Anand Prakash
Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.705

7.  Reliability and correlation analysis of computed methods to convert conventional 2D radiological hindfoot measurements to a 3D setting using weightbearing CT.

Authors:  A Burssens; J Peeters; M Peiffer; R Marien; T Lenaerts; G Vandeputte; J Victor
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  The arthroscopic syndesmotic assessment tool can differentiate between stable and unstable ankle syndesmoses.

Authors:  Bart Lubberts; Daniel Guss; Bryan G Vopat; Anne H Johnson; C Niek van Dijk; Hang Lee; Christopher W DiGiovanni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Range of Normal and Abnormal Syndesmotic Measurements Using Weightbearing CT.

Authors:  Noortje Catharina Hagemeijer; Song Ho Chang; Mohamed Elghazy Abdelaziz; Jack Christopher Casey; Gregory Richard Waryasz; Daniel Guss; Christopher William DiGiovanni
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.827

10.  Part 1: Simple Definition and Calculation of Accuracy, Sensitivity and Specificity.

Authors:  Alireza Baratloo; Mostafa Hosseini; Ahmed Negida; Gehad El Ashal
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.