Literature DB >> 25672945

Can pre-operative axial CT imaging predict syndesmosis instability in patients sustaining ankle fractures? Seven years' experience in a tertiary trauma center.

Tsz Wai Yeung1, Chung Yan Grace Chan, Wun Cheung Samuel Chan, Yuk Nam Yeung, Ming Keung Yuen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to explore the diagnostic accuracy of CT measurements in predicting syndesmosis instability of injured ankle, with correlation to operative findings.
METHODS: From July 2006 to June 2013, 123 patients presented to a single tertiary hospital who received pre-operative CT for ankle fractures were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation for fractures and intra-operative syndesmosis integrity tests. The morphology of incisura fibularis was categorized as deep or shallow. The tibiofibular distance (TFD) between the medial border of the fibula and the nearest point of the lateral border of tibia were measured at anterior (aTFD), middle (mTFD), posterior (pTFD), and maximal (maxTFD) portions across the syndesmosis on axial CT images at 10 mm proximal to the tibial plafond. Statistical analysis was performed with independent samples t test and ROC curve analysis. Intraobserver reproducibility and inter-observers agreement were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Of the 123 patients, 39 (31.7%) were operatively diagnosed with syndesmosis instability. No significant difference of incisura fibularis morphology (deep or shallow) and TFDs was demonstrated respective to genders. The axial CT measurements were significantly higher in ankles diagnosed with syndesmosis instability than the group without (maxTFD means 7.2 ± 2.96 mm vs. 4.6 ± 1.4 mm, aTFD mean 4.9 ± 3.7 mm vs. 1.8 ± 1.4 mm, mTFD mean 5.3 ± 2.4 mm vs. 3.2 ± 1.6 mm, pTFD mean 5.3 ± 1.8 mm vs. 4.1 ± 1.3 mm, p < 0.05). Their respective cutoff values with best sensitivity and specificity were calculated; the aTFD (AUC 0.798) and maxTFD (AUC 0.794) achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy. The optimal cutoff levels were aTFD =  mm (sensitivity, 56.4%; specificity, 91.7%) and maxTFD = 5.65 mm (sensitivity, 74.4%; specificity, 79.8%). The inter-observer agreement was good for all aTFD, mTFD, pTFD, and maxTFD measurements (ICC 0.959, 0.799, 0.783, and 0.865). The ICC for intraobserver agreement was also very good, ranging from 0.826 to 0.923.
CONCLUSIONS: Axial CT measurements of tibiofibular distance were useful predictors for syndesmosis instability in fractured ankles. The aTFD and maxTFD are the most powerful parameters to predict positive operative instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25672945     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-015-2107-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  19 in total

1.  The influence of ankle positioning on the radiography of the distal tibial tubercles.

Authors:  A Beumer; B A Swierstra
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  A radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis.

Authors:  M C Harper; T S Keller
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1989-12

3.  Ligamentous injury of the lower tibiofibular syndesmosis: radiographic evidence.

Authors:  S J Sclafani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The effects of rotation on radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis.

Authors:  Spiros G Pneumaticos; Philip C Noble; Sofia N Chatziioannou; Saul G Trevino
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  Radiographic and CT evaluation of tibiofibular syndesmotic diastasis: a cadaver study.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; J Lu; H Yang; A O Mekhail; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.827

6.  Instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis after bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures.

Authors:  H C Leeds; M G Ehrlich
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The stability of the tibio-fibular syndesmosis following rigid internal fixation for type C malleolar fractures: an experimental and clinical study.

Authors:  P Riegels-Nielsen; J Christensen; J Greiff
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Quantitative criteria for prediction of the results after displaced fracture of the ankle.

Authors:  F A Pettrone; M Gail; D Pee; T Fitzpatrick; L B Van Herpe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Delayed operative treatment of syndesmotic instability. Current concepts review.

Authors:  Michel P J van den Bekerom; Peter A J de Leeuw; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  The influence of a diastasis screw on the outcome of Weber type-C ankle fractures.

Authors:  H R Chissell; J Jones
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-05
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Imaging in syndesmotic injury: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Nicola Krähenbühl; Maxwell W Weinberg; Nathan P Davidson; Megan K Mills; Beat Hintermann; Charles L Saltzman; Alexej Barg
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Torque application helps to diagnose incomplete syndesmotic injuries using weight-bearing computed tomography images.

Authors:  Nicola Krähenbühl; Travis L Bailey; Angela P Presson; Chelsea McCarty Allen; Heath B Henninger; Charles L Saltzman; Alexej Barg
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Current trends in the diagnosis and management of syndesmotic injury.

Authors:  Matthew L Vopat; Bryan G Vopat; Bart Lubberts; Christopher W DiGiovanni
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-03

4.  Imaging of the subtalar joint: A novel approach to an old problem.

Authors:  Nicola Krähenbühl; Amy L Lenz; Rich Lisonbee; Manja Deforth; Lukas Zwicky; Beat Hintermann; Charles L Saltzman; Andrew E Anderson; Alexej Barg
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Intraoperative Chertsey Test, is it a Reliable Alternative to Computed Tomography Scan for Diagnosing Syndesmotic Injuries of the Ankle?

Authors:  Shahram Sayyadi; Mohammad Mahdi Omidian; Ali Pourmojarab; Abouzar Khodayi; Mojtaba Baroutkoub; Sohrab Salimi; Alireza Manafi Rasi
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 6.  Which test is the best? An updated literature review of imaging modalities for acute ankle diastasis injuries.

Authors:  Nico Ng; James Randolph Onggo; Mithun Nambiar; Julian Tam Maingard; David Ng; Gaurav Gupta; Dee Nandurkar; Sina Babazadeh; Harvinder Bedi
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2022-05-03

7.  A reliable radiographic measurement for evaluation of normal distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a multi-detector computed tomography study in adults.

Authors:  Yanxi Chen; Minfei Qiang; Kun Zhang; Haobo Li; Hao Dai
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.303

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.