Literature DB >> 24114866

Round window closure affects cochlear responses to suprathreshold stimuli.

Qunfeng Cai1, Carolyn Whitcomb, Jessica Eggleston, Wei Sun, Richard Salvi, Bo Hua Hu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The round window acts as a vent for releasing inner ear pressure and facilitating basilar membrane vibration. Loss of this venting function affects cochlear function, which leads to hearing impairment. In an effort to identify functional changes that might be used in clinical diagnosis of round window atresia, the current investigation was designed to examine how the cochlea responds to suprathreshold stimuli following round window closure. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, animal study.
METHODS: A rat model of round window occlusion (RWO) was established. With this model, the thresholds of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and the input/output (IO) functions of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and acoustic startle responses were examined.
RESULTS: Round window closure caused a mild shift in the thresholds of the auditory brainstem response (13.5 ± 9.1 dB). It also reduced the amplitudes of the distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the slope of the input/output functions. This peripheral change was accompanied by a significant reduction in the amplitude, but not the threshold, of the acoustic startle reflex, a motor response to suprathreshold sounds.
CONCLUSIONS: In addition to causing mild increase in the threshold of the auditory brainstem response, round window occlusion reduced the slopes of both distortion product otoacoustic emissions and startle reflex input/output functions. These changes differ from those observed for typical conductive or sensory hearing loss, and could be present in patients with round window atresia. However, future clinical observations in patients are needed to confirm these findings.
Copyright © 2013 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Round window; acoustic startle reflex; atresia; distortion product otoacoustic emission; rats

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24114866      PMCID: PMC4219855          DOI: 10.1002/lary.24394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  16 in total

1.  Round window obliteration by osteoma of the middle ear.

Authors:  J C Britt; R J Hood; G T Hashisaki
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Middle ear and cochlear disorders result in different DPOAE growth behaviour: implications for the differentiation of sound conductive and cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel D Gehr; Thomas Janssen; Christiane E Michaelis; Kerstin Deingruber; Kerstin Lamm
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Isolated congenital round window absence.

Authors:  Christian Martin; Stéphane Tringali; Pierre Bertholon; Jean-François Pouget; Jean-Michel Prades
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  Sealing of the round window reversibly affects auditory brainstem response latencies.

Authors:  O Spandow; M Anniko; A R Möller
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Round window atresia and its effect on sound transmission.

Authors:  Thomas E Linder; Furong Ma; Alex Huber
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Long-term effect of acoustic trauma on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in chickens.

Authors:  O Froymovich; V Rebala; R J Salvi; H Rassael
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The effects of chronic otitis media with effusion on the measurement of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  R G Amedee
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Stapedectomy and round window closure.

Authors:  J J Shea; J B Farrior
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  A primary acoustic startle circuit: lesion and stimulation studies.

Authors:  M Davis; D S Gendelman; M D Tischler; P M Gendelman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Analysis of cochlear protein profiles of Wistar, Sprague-Dawley, and Fischer 344 rats with normal hearing function.

Authors:  Samson Jamesdaniel; Dalian Ding; Mohammad Habiby Kermany; Haiyan Jiang; Richard Salvi; Donald Coling
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.466

View more
  4 in total

1.  Intracochlear Drug Injections through the Round Window Membrane: Measures to Improve Drug Retention.

Authors:  Stefan K Plontke; Jared J Hartsock; Ruth M Gill; Alec N Salt
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 2.  Limits on normal cochlear 'third' windows provided by previous investigations of additional sound paths into and out of the cat inner ear.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Peter Bowers; Hideko H Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Prolonged low-level noise exposure reduces rat distortion product otoacoustic emissions above a critical level.

Authors:  Deng-Ling Zhao; Adam Sheppard; Massimo Ralli; Xiaopeng Liu; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Reduction in noise-induced functional loss of the cochleae in mice with pre-existing cochlear dysfunction due to genetic interference of prestin.

Authors:  Qunfeng Cai; Bo Wang; Donald Coling; Jian Zuo; Jie Fang; Shiming Yang; Krystal Vera; Bo Hua Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.