Literature DB >> 24818997

Motion mitigation in scanned ion beam therapy through 4D-optimization.

Christian Graeff1.   

Abstract

The treatment of moving tumors remains challenging, especially with scanned ion beam therapy due to interplay effects and the strong range dependence. This is especially true in the context of radiosurgery with high dose delivered in few or single fractions. Inverse treatment planning on the entire 4D-CT may result in conformal plans inherently adapted to the moving anatomy of the patient. Existing studies on this topic for photon therapy are reviewed, but arguably the benefits for ion beam therapy can be even greater. Compared to the main conformal mitigation technique of beam tracking, 4D-optimization permits a) easier, offline handling of range changes, b) handling of complex motion patterns, and c) improved dose shaping capabilities outside of the target. Different approaches for 4D-optimization in scanned ion beam therapy are proposed and compared, together with delivery methods that provide the necessary synchronization between irradiation and detected patient motion. Potential solutions for the improvement of robustness in 4D-optimization are discussed. A method for delivery of homogenous doses to each motion phase is presented that might be a potential solution for robust conformal dose delivery for future clinical use. In an exemplary lung cancer patient case with a large motion amplitude, 4D-optimization resulted in conformal dose coverage while beam tracking did not. In conclusion, different strategies of 4D-optimization could provide increased OAR sparing and highly conformal dose delivery for targets with complex motion patterns and large amplitudes.
Copyright © 2014 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4D-optimization; Intrafractional motion; Motion mitigation; Treatment planning

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24818997     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  20 in total

1.  Robust optimization in IMPT using quadratic objective functions to account for the minimum MU constraint.

Authors:  Jie Shan; Yu An; Martin Bues; Steven E Schild; Wei Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  How should we manage internal margins in four-dimensional dose assessments?

Authors:  Shinichiro Mori; Christian Graeff; Nobuyuki Kanematsu
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-10-07

Review 3.  Empowering Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Through Physics and Technology: An Overview.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; Indra J Das; Clifton C Ling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Exploratory Study of 4D versus 3D Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Steven E Schild; Joe Y Chang; Zhongxing Liao; Yu-Hui Chang; Zhifei Wen; Jiajian Shen; Joshua B Stoker; Xiaoning Ding; Yanle Hu; Narayan Sahoo; Michael G Herman; Carlos Vargas; Sameer Keole; William Wong; Martin Bues
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Proton beam therapy for tumors of the upper abdomen.

Authors:  Ann Raldow; James Lamb; Theodore Hong
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Impact of Spot Size and Spacing on the Quality of Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Chenbin Liu; Steven E Schild; Joe Y Chang; Zhongxing Liao; Shawn Korte; Jiajian Shen; Xiaoning Ding; Yanle Hu; Yixiu Kang; Sameer R Keole; Terence T Sio; William W Wong; Narayan Sahoo; Martin Bues; Wei Liu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Planning strategies for inter-fractional robustness in pancreatic patients treated with scanned carbon therapy.

Authors:  Vania Batista; Daniel Richter; Stephanie E Combs; Oliver Jäkel
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Assessment of a diaphragm override strategy for robustly optimized proton therapy planning for esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Sabine Visser; Hendrike Neh; Cássia Oraboni Ribeiro; Erik W Korevaar; Arturs Meijers; Björn Poppe; Nanna M Sijtsema; Stefan Both; Johannes A Langendijk; Christina T Muijs; Antje C Knopf
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 4.506

9.  Modeling Combined Chemotherapy and Particle Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Francesco Tommasino; Shigeru Yamada
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Management of organ motion in scanned ion beam therapy.

Authors:  Christoph Bert; Klaus Herfarth
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.