Literature DB >> 15191305

A new smoothing procedure to reduce delivery segments for static MLC-based IMRT planning.

Xuepeng Sun1, Ping Xia.   

Abstract

In the application of pixel-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using the step-and-shoot delivery method, one major difficulty is the prolonged delivery time. In this study, we present an integrated IMRT planning system that involves a simple smoothing method to reduce the complexity of the beam profiles. The system consists of three main steps: (a) an inverse planning process based on a least-square dose-based cost function; (b) smoothing of the intensity maps; (c) reoptimization of the segment weights. Step (a) obtains the best plan with the lowest cost value using a simulated annealing optimization algorithm with discrete intensity levels. Step (b) takes the intensity maps obtained from (a) and reduces the complexity of the maps by smoothing the adjacent beamlet intensities. During this process each beamlet is assigned a structure index based on anatomical information. A smoothing update is applied to average adjacent beamlets with the same index. To control the quality of the plan, a predefined clinical protocol is used as an acceptance criterion. The smoothing updates that violate the criterion are rejected. After the smoothing process, the segment weights are reoptimized in step (c) to further improve the plan quality. Three clinical cases were studied using this system: a medulloblastoma, a prostate cancer, and an oropharyngeal carcinoma. While the final plans demonstrate a degradation of the original plan quality, they still meet the plan acceptance criterion. On the other hand, the segment numbers or delivery times are reduced by 40%, 20%, and 20% for the three cases, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15191305     DOI: 10.1118/1.1713279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  Search for IMRT inverse plans with piecewise constant fluence maps using compressed sensing techniques.

Authors:  Lei Zhu; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Adaptive diffusion smoothing: a diffusion-based method to reduce IMRT field complexity.

Authors:  Martha M Matuszak; Edward W Larsen; Kyung-Wook Jee; Daniel L McShan; Benedick A Fraass
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Influence of segment width on plan quality for volumetric modulated arc based stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors:  Karthikeyan Nithiyanantham; Ganesh Kadirampatti Mani; Vikraman Subramani; Karrthick Karukkupalayam Palaniappan; Mohanraj Uthiran; Sennniandavar Vellengiri; Sambasivaselli Raju; Sanjay S Supe; Tejinder Kataria
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-04-16

4.  Robust optimization in IMPT using quadratic objective functions to account for the minimum MU constraint.

Authors:  Jie Shan; Yu An; Martin Bues; Steven E Schild; Wei Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Use of plan quality degradation to evaluate tradeoffs in delivery efficiency and clinical plan metrics arising from IMRT optimizer and sequencer compromises.

Authors:  Joel R Wilkie; Martha M Matuszak; Mary Feng; Jean M Moran; Benedick A Fraass
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Three-dimensional conformal planning with low-segment multicriteria intensity modulated radiation therapy optimization.

Authors:  Fazal Khan; David Craft
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-08-21

7.  Effect of fluence smoothing on the quality of intensity-modulated radiation treatment plans.

Authors:  Puzhakkal Niyas; Kallikuzhiyil Kochunny Abdullah; Manthala Padannayil Noufal; Thekkedath Sankaran Nair
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-03-07

8.  Evaluation of fluence-smoothing feature for three IMRT planning systems.

Authors:  Christopher J Anker; Brian Wang; Matt Tobler; Julie Chapek; Dennis C Shrieve; Ying J Hitchcock; Bill J Salter
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  What is an acceptably smoothed fluence? Dosimetric and delivery considerations for dynamic sliding window IMRT.

Authors:  Nicolini Giorgia; Fogliata Antonella; Vanetti Eugenio; Clivio Alessandro; Ammazzalorso Filippo; Cozzi Luca
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  A study of minimum segment width parameter on VMAT plan quality, delivery accuracy, and efficiency for cervical cancer using Monaco TPS.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Li Chen; Fengying Zhu; Wanjing Guo; Dandan Zhang; Wenzhao Sun
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.