Zhichao Feng1, Pengfei Rong1, Peng Cao2, Qingyu Zhou1, Wenwei Zhu1, Zhimin Yan1, Qianyun Liu1, Wei Wang3. 1. Department of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China. 2. GE Healthcare, Shanghai, 210000, China. 3. Department of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China. cjr.wangwei@vip.163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of machine-learning based quantitative texture analysis of CT images to differentiate small (≤ 4 cm) angiomyolipoma without visible fat (AMLwvf) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: This single-institutional retrospective study included 58 patients with pathologically proven small renal mass (17 in AMLwvf and 41 in RCC groups). Texture features were extracted from the largest possible tumorous regions of interest (ROIs) by manual segmentation in preoperative three-phase CT images. Interobserver reliability and the Mann-Whitney U test were applied to select features preliminarily. Then support vector machine with recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) and synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) were adopted to establish discriminative classifiers, and the performance of classifiers was assessed. RESULTS: Of the 42 extracted features, 16 candidate features showed significant intergroup differences (P < 0.05) and had good interobserver agreement. An optimal feature subset including 11 features was further selected by the SVM-RFE method. The SVM-RFE+SMOTE classifier achieved the best performance in discriminating between small AMLwvf and RCC, with the highest accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and AUC of 93.9 %, 87.8 %, 100 % and 0.955, respectively. CONCLUSION: Machine learning analysis of CT texture features can facilitate the accurate differentiation of small AMLwvf from RCC. KEY POINTS: • Although conventional CT is useful for diagnosis of SRMs, it has limitations. • Machine-learning based CT texture analysis facilitate differentiation of small AMLwvf from RCC. • The highest accuracy of SVM-RFE+SMOTE classifier reached 93.9 %. • Texture analysis combined with machine-learning methods might spare unnecessary surgery for AMLwvf.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of machine-learning based quantitative texture analysis of CT images to differentiate small (≤ 4 cm) angiomyolipoma without visible fat (AMLwvf) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: This single-institutional retrospective study included 58 patients with pathologically proven small renal mass (17 in AMLwvf and 41 in RCC groups). Texture features were extracted from the largest possible tumorous regions of interest (ROIs) by manual segmentation in preoperative three-phase CT images. Interobserver reliability and the Mann-Whitney U test were applied to select features preliminarily. Then support vector machine with recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) and synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) were adopted to establish discriminative classifiers, and the performance of classifiers was assessed. RESULTS: Of the 42 extracted features, 16 candidate features showed significant intergroup differences (P < 0.05) and had good interobserver agreement. An optimal feature subset including 11 features was further selected by the SVM-RFE method. The SVM-RFE+SMOTE classifier achieved the best performance in discriminating between small AMLwvf and RCC, with the highest accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and AUC of 93.9 %, 87.8 %, 100 % and 0.955, respectively. CONCLUSION: Machine learning analysis of CT texture features can facilitate the accurate differentiation of small AMLwvf from RCC. KEY POINTS: • Although conventional CT is useful for diagnosis of SRMs, it has limitations. • Machine-learning based CT texture analysis facilitate differentiation of small AMLwvf from RCC. • The highest accuracy of SVM-RFE+SMOTE classifier reached 93.9 %. • Texture analysis combined with machine-learning methods might spare unnecessary surgery for AMLwvf.
Authors: Taryn Hodgdon; Matthew D F McInnes; Nicola Schieda; Trevor A Flood; Leslie Lamb; Rebecca E Thornhill Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Shaheed W Hakim; Nicola Schieda; Taryn Hodgdon; Matthew D F McInnes; Marc Dilauro; Trevor A Flood Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Duc Fehr; Harini Veeraraghavan; Andreas Wibmer; Tatsuo Gondo; Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Herbert Alberto Vargas; Evis Sala; Hedvig Hricak; Joseph O Deasy Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Harbir S Sidhu; Salvatore Benigno; Balaji Ganeshan; Nikos Dikaios; Edward W Johnston; Clare Allen; Alex Kirkham; Ashley M Groves; Hashim U Ahmed; Mark Emberton; Stuart A Taylor; Steve Halligan; Shonit Punwani Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Hersh Sagreiya; Alireza Akhbardeh; Dandan Li; Rosa Sigrist; Benjamin I Chung; Geoffrey A Sonn; Lu Tian; Daniel L Rubin; Jürgen K Willmann Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2019-05-25 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Kathleen Nguyen; Nicola Schieda; Nick James; Matthew D F McInnes; Mark Wu; Rebecca E Thornhill Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 5.315