Ruimeng Yang1,2, Jialiang Wu2, Lei Sun3, Shengsheng Lai4, Yikai Xu5, Xilong Liu5, Ying Ma2, Xin Zhen6. 1. Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510180, Guangdong, China. 2. Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510180, Guangdong, China. 3. School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. 4. Department of Medical Equipment, Guangdong Food and Drug Vocational College, Guangzhou, 510520, Guangdong, China. 5. Department of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. 6. School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. xinzhen@smu.edu.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the discriminative capabilities of different machine learning-based classification models on the differentiation of small (< 4 cm) renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat (AMLwvf) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: This study retrospectively collected 163 patients with pathologically proven small renal mass, including 118 RCC and 45 AMLwvf patients. Target region of interest (ROI) delineation, followed by texture feature extraction, was performed on a representative slice with the largest lesion area on each phase of the four-phase CT images. Fifteen concatenations of the four-phasic features were fed into 224 classification models (built with 8 classifiers and 28 feature selection methods), classification performances of the 3360 resultant discriminative models were compared, and the top-ranked features were analyzed. RESULTS: Image features extracted from the unenhanced phase (UP) CT image demonstrated dominant classification performances over features from other three phases. The two discriminative models "SVM + t_score" and "SVM + relief" achieved the highest classification AUC of 0.90. The 10 top-ranked features from UP included 1 shape feature, 5 first-order statistics features, and 4 texture features, where the shape feature and the first-order statistics features showed superior discriminative capabilities in differentiating RCC vs. AMLwvf through the t-SNE visualization. CONCLUSION: Image features extracted from UP are sufficient to generate accurate differentiation between AMLwvf and RCC using machine learning-based classification model. KEY POINTS: • Radiomics extracted from unenhanced CT are sufficient to accurately differentiate angiomyolipoma without visible fat and renal cell carcinoma using machine learning-based classification model. • The highest discriminative models achieved an AUC of 0.90 and were based on the analysis of unenhanced CT, alone or in association with images obtained at the nephrographic phase. • Features related to shape and to histogram analysis (first-order statistics) showed superior discrimination compared with gray-level distribution of the image (second-order statistics, commonly called texture features).
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the discriminative capabilities of different machine learning-based classification models on the differentiation of small (< 4 cm) renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat (AMLwvf) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: This study retrospectively collected 163 patients with pathologically proven small renal mass, including 118 RCC and 45 AMLwvf patients. Target region of interest (ROI) delineation, followed by texture feature extraction, was performed on a representative slice with the largest lesion area on each phase of the four-phase CT images. Fifteen concatenations of the four-phasic features were fed into 224 classification models (built with 8 classifiers and 28 feature selection methods), classification performances of the 3360 resultant discriminative models were compared, and the top-ranked features were analyzed. RESULTS: Image features extracted from the unenhanced phase (UP) CT image demonstrated dominant classification performances over features from other three phases. The two discriminative models "SVM + t_score" and "SVM + relief" achieved the highest classification AUC of 0.90. The 10 top-ranked features from UP included 1 shape feature, 5 first-order statistics features, and 4 texture features, where the shape feature and the first-order statistics features showed superior discriminative capabilities in differentiating RCC vs. AMLwvf through the t-SNE visualization. CONCLUSION: Image features extracted from UP are sufficient to generate accurate differentiation between AMLwvf and RCC using machine learning-based classification model. KEY POINTS: • Radiomics extracted from unenhanced CT are sufficient to accurately differentiate angiomyolipoma without visible fat and renal cell carcinoma using machine learning-based classification model. • The highest discriminative models achieved an AUC of 0.90 and were based on the analysis of unenhanced CT, alone or in association with images obtained at the nephrographic phase. • Features related to shape and to histogram analysis (first-order statistics) showed superior discrimination compared with gray-level distribution of the image (second-order statistics, commonly called texture features).
Authors: Taryn Hodgdon; Matthew D F McInnes; Nicola Schieda; Trevor A Flood; Leslie Lamb; Rebecca E Thornhill Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Claus Simpfendorfer; Brian R Herts; Gaspar A Motta-Ramirez; Daniel S Lockwood; Ming Zhou; Michael Leiber; Erick M Remer Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Joost J M van Griethuysen; Andriy Fedorov; Chintan Parmar; Ahmed Hosny; Nicole Aucoin; Vivek Narayan; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Steve Pieper; Hugo J W L Aerts Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Felix Y Yap; Bino A Varghese; Steven Y Cen; Darryl H Hwang; Xiaomeng Lei; Bhushan Desai; Christopher Lau; Lindsay L Yang; Austin J Fullenkamp; Simin Hajian; Marielena Rivas; Megha Nayyar Gupta; Brian D Quinn; Manju Aron; Mihir M Desai; Monish Aron; Assad A Oberai; Inderbir S Gill; Vinay A Duddalwar Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-08-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Lin Lu; Firas S Ahmed; Oguz Akin; Lyndon Luk; Xiaotao Guo; Hao Yang; Jin Yoon; A Aari Hakimi; Lawrence H Schwartz; Binsheng Zhao Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 6.244