Literature DB >> 29096452

Intermolecular interactions in the condensed phase: Evaluation of semi-empirical quantum mechanical methods.

Anders S Christensen1, Jimmy C Kromann2, Jan H Jensen2, Qiang Cui1.   

Abstract

To facilitate further development of approximate quantum mechanical methods for condensed phase applications, we present a new benchmark dataset of intermolecular interaction energies in the solution phase for a set of 15 dimers, each containing one charged monomer. The reference interaction energy in solution is computed via a thermodynamic cycle that integrates dimer binding energy in the gas phase at the coupled cluster level and solute-solvent interaction with density functional theory; the estimated uncertainty of such calculated interaction energy is ±1.5 kcal/mol. The dataset is used to benchmark the performance of a set of semi-empirical quantum mechanical (SQM) methods that include DFTB3-D3, DFTB3/CPE-D3, OM2-D3, PM6-D3, PM6-D3H+, and PM7 as well as the HF-3c method. We find that while all tested SQM methods tend to underestimate binding energies in the gas phase with a root-mean-squared error (RMSE) of 2-5 kcal/mol, they overestimate binding energies in the solution phase with an RMSE of 3-4 kcal/mol, with the exception of DFTB3/CPE-D3 and OM2-D3, for which the systematic deviation is less pronounced. In addition, we find that HF-3c systematically overestimates binding energies in both gas and solution phases. As most approximate QM methods are parametrized and evaluated using data measured or calculated in the gas phase, the dataset represents an important first step toward calibrating QM based methods for application in the condensed phase where polarization and exchange repulsion need to be treated in a balanced fashion.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29096452      PMCID: PMC5469681          DOI: 10.1063/1.4985605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  47 in total

1.  Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-10-28       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Low-Cost Quantum Chemical Methods for Noncovalent Interactions.

Authors:  Jan Gerit Brandenburg; Manuel Hochheim; Thomas Bredow; Stefan Grimme
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 6.475

3.  Improvement of semiempirical response properties with charge-dependent response density.

Authors:  Timothy J Giese; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Density functional tight binding: values of semi-empirical methods in an ab initio era.

Authors:  Qiang Cui; Marcus Elstner
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory.

Authors:  Stefan Grimme; Stephan Ehrlich; Lars Goerigk
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Extended polarization in third-order SCC-DFTB from chemical-potential equalization.

Authors:  Steve Kaminski; Timothy J Giese; Michael Gaus; Darrin M York; Marcus Elstner
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 7.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Improving intermolecular interactions in DFTB3 using extended polarization from chemical-potential equalization.

Authors:  Anders S Christensen; Marcus Elstner; Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Specific Reaction Parametrization of the AM1/d Hamiltonian for Phosphoryl Transfer Reactions:  H, O, and P Atoms.

Authors:  Kwangho Nam; Qiang Cui; Jiali Gao; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Assessing the Accuracy of Density Functional and Semiempirical Wave Function Methods for Water Nanoparticles: Comparing Binding and Relative Energies of (H2O)16 and (H2O)17 to CCSD(T) Results.

Authors:  Hannah R Leverentz; Helena W Qi; Donald G Truhlar
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  4 in total

1.  Exploring the applicability of density functional tight binding to transition metal ions. Parameterization for nickel with the spin-polarized DFTB3 model.

Authors:  Milena Vujović; Mioy Huynh; Sebastian Steiner; Pablo Garcia-Fernandez; Marcus Elstner; Qiang Cui; Maja Gruden
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Analysis of Density Functional Tight Binding with Natural Bonding Orbitals.

Authors:  Xiya Lu; Juan Duchimaza-Heredia; Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.781

3.  Biomolecular QM/MM Simulations: What Are Some of the "Burning Issues"?

Authors:  Qiang Cui; Tanmoy Pal; Luke Xie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Semiempirical Quantum-Chemical Methods with Orthogonalization and Dispersion Corrections.

Authors:  Pavlo O Dral; Xin Wu; Walter Thiel
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 6.006

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.