Literature DB >> 2909185

Differences in the timeliness of diagnosis, breast and cervical cancer, San Francisco 1974-85.

L D Saunders1.   

Abstract

Cancer registry data for San Francisco (1974-85) were used to identify women at greater risk of late diagnoses for breast and cervical cancers by age and ethnicity. For breast cancer, Black women were at greater risk for late diagnoses. For cervical cancer, women of all ethnic groups ages 50-69 years and Japanese and Filipino women were at greater risk for late diagnoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2909185      PMCID: PMC1349473          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.79.1.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  7 in total

1.  Mortality from cancer of the uterus in Canada and its relationship to screening for cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  A B Miller; J Lindsay; G B Hill
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1976-05-15       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Social class and black-white differences in breast cancer survival.

Authors:  M T Bassett; N Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer.

Authors:  M Hakama; U Räsänen-Virtanen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Progress in screening for early breast cancer.

Authors:  L H Baker; T D Chin; K V Wagner
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Evaluation of mass screening programmes for cervical cancer in N.E. Scotland.

Authors:  J E Macgregor
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1976 May-Jun
  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  An examination of differential follow-up rates in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  P Fox; P Amsberger; X Zhang
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1997-06

2.  Do we believe what patients say about their neoplastic symptoms? An analysis of factors that influence the interviewer's judgement.

Authors:  M Porta; N Malats; J Belloc; M Gallén; E Fernandez
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  The late-stage diagnosis of colorectal cancer: demographic and socioeconomic factors.

Authors:  J Mandelblatt; H Andrews; R Kao; R Wallace; J Kerner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Health Belief Model variables as predictors of screening mammography utilization.

Authors:  R B Hyman; S Baker; R Ephraim; A Moadel; J Philip
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-08

5.  Cervical cancer screening in hospitals: the efficacy of legislation in Maryland.

Authors:  A C Klassen; D D Celentano; C S Weisman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Stage and delay in breast cancer diagnosis by race, socioeconomic status, age and year.

Authors:  J L Richardson; B Langholz; L Bernstein; C Burciaga; K Danley; R K Ross
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.