Literature DB >> 1270176

Mortality from cancer of the uterus in Canada and its relationship to screening for cancer of the cervix.

A B Miller, J Lindsay, G B Hill.   

Abstract

Age-standardized death rates at ages 30-64 from cancer of the uterus in the 10 provinces of Canada have been assessed in 1950-52, 1960-62 and 1970-72, and changes in rats over these periods related to screening for cancer of the cervix and variables derived from the censuses of 1961 and 1971. Death rates at the county and census division level have also been assessed for the provinces of Nova Scotia, Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba and Alberta for 1960-62 and 1970-72 and related to screening and census-derived variables. There is little indication of a contribution of screening to the fall in death rates that occurred in eight of the 10 provinces from 1950-52 to 1960-62. There is, however, evidence of an important and significant contribution of the intensity of screening (as indicated by the number of cervical cytology examinations conducted in 1966 expressed as a rate per 1,000 female population aged 20 or more) to the fall in death rates at both the provincial and county or census division levels from 1960-62 to 1970-72, and this effect is not abolished by taking the census-derived variables into account. It is concluded that a significant effect of intensity of screening on the reduction in mortality from cancer of the uterus in Canada in the age-group 30-64 over the period 1960-62 to 1970-72 has been demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1270176     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910170508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  32 in total

1.  Cervical cancer: the increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in younger women.

Authors:  S Liu; R Semenciw; Y Mao
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Recent trends in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening test utilization in Canada, using self-reported data from 2008 and 2012.

Authors:  D Major; D Armstrong; H Bryant; W Cheung; K Decker; G Doyle; V Mai; C M McLachlin; J Niu; J Payne; N Shukla
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Report of a National Workshop on Screening for Cancer of the Cervix.

Authors:  A B Miller; G Anderson; J Brisson; J Laidlaw; N Le Pitre; P Malcolmson; P Mirwaldt; G Stuart; W Sullivan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Differences in the timeliness of diagnosis, breast and cervical cancer, San Francisco 1974-85.

Authors:  L D Saunders
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Prevention in family practice: Consensus statement from the front line.

Authors:  G Satenstein; J Lemelin; C Folkerson; K A Scott; W E Hogg
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  [Not Available].

Authors:  L Baillargeon; M Labrecoue; J Martin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Cervical smears.

Authors:  A I Spriggs; O A Husain
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-06-11

8.  Recommendations on screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  James Dickinson; Eva Tsakonas; Sarah Conner Gorber; Gabriela Lewin; Elizabeth Shaw; Harminder Singh; Michel Joffres; Richard Birtwhistle; Marcello Tonelli; Verna Mai; Meg McLachlin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Efficacy of screening for cervical cancer: a review.

Authors:  D S Guzick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Screening hospital patients for uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  E Hudson; S Hewertson; C Jansz; H Gordon
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.