Literature DB >> 8363009

Cervical cancer screening in hospitals: the efficacy of legislation in Maryland.

A C Klassen1, D D Celentano, C S Weisman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to examine the efficacy of a Maryland law requiring Pap testing to be offered during hospital admissions. "In-reach" strategies emphasize cancer screening within existing health care contacts (such as inpatient stays) rather than additional visits solely for screening.
METHODS: Data from a 1986 telephone survey of Maryland women were used to examine the effect of hospitalization on self-reported Pap testing in a 3-year period. The effect of hospitalization on screening was examined by age and income to assess whether inpatient screening was more prevalent among certain subgroups of women.
RESULTS: For the group as a whole, the odds of Pap screening did not vary with hospitalization. However, among women aged 45 to 54 years with annual household incomes over $20,000, hospitalized women were more likely than nonhospitalized women to report recent Pap tests. For low-income women aged 75 years and older, hospitalization actually decreased the likelihood of reporting Pap tests.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite legislation, inpatient cervical cancer screening appears to mirror outpatient patterns, leaving elderly and low-income women unscreened. Methods for increasing inpatient Pap testing for underscreened women are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8363009      PMCID: PMC1694988          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.83.9.1316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  15 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 1991.

Authors:  C C Boring; T S Squires; T Tong
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  'Avoidable mortality' from cervical cancer: exploring the concept.

Authors:  J Howard
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Prevention of cervix cancer deaths through hospital screening.

Authors:  P Greenwald; P C Nasca; E D Gordon
Journal:  N Y State J Med       Date:  1972-03-15

4.  Missed opportunities for early diagnosis of cancer of the cervix.

Authors:  R G Fruchter; J Boyce; M Hunt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Efficacy of screening for cervical cancer: a review.

Authors:  D S Guzick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Screening hospital patients for uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  E Hudson; S Hewertson; C Jansz; H Gordon
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The role of contraceptive use in cervical cancer: the Maryland Cervical Cancer Case-Control Study.

Authors:  D D Celentano; A C Klassen; C S Weisman; N B Rosenshein
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Pap testing intervals. Specialty differences in physicians' recommendations in relation to women's pap testing behavior.

Authors:  M A Teitelbaum; C S Weisman; A C Klassen; D Celentano
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Preventive health practices in a teaching hospital: house staff attitudes and performance of gynecological screening.

Authors:  A Ziffer; P Song; J Mandelblatt
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Screening procedures in the asymptomatic adult. Comparison of physicians' recommendations, patients' desires, published guidelines, and actual practice.

Authors:  B Woo; B Woo; E F Cook; M Weisberg; L Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-09-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in an inpatient hospital setting.

Authors:  Cornelia L Trimble; Lynn A Richards; Barbara Wilgus-Wegweiser; Karen Plowden; Dorothy L Rosenthal; Ann Klassen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.661

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.