Literature DB >> 29090504

Computational design of membrane proteins using RosettaMembrane.

Amanda M Duran1,2, Jens Meiler1,2.   

Abstract

Computational membrane protein design is challenging due to the small number of high-resolution structures available to elucidate the physical basis of membrane protein structure, multiple functionally important conformational states, and a limited number of high-throughput biophysical assays to monitor function. However, structural determination of membrane proteins has made tremendous progress in the past years. Concurrently the field of soluble computational design has made impressive inroads. These developments allow us to tackle the formidable challenge of designing functional membrane proteins. Herein, Rosetta is benchmarked for membrane protein design. We evaluate strategies to cope with the often reduced quality of experimental membrane protein structures. Further, we test the usage of symmetry in design protocols, which is particularly important as many membrane proteins exist as homo-oligomers. We compare a soluble scoring function with a scoring function optimized for membrane proteins, RosettaMembrane. Both scoring functions recovered around half of the native sequence when completely redesigning membrane proteins. However, RosettaMembrane recovered the most native-like amino acid property composition. While leucine was overrepresented in the inner and outer-hydrophobic regions of RosettaMembrane designs, it resulted in a native-like surface hydrophobicity indicating that it is currently the best option for designing membrane proteins with Rosetta.
© 2017 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rosetta; RosettaMembrane; computational design; membrane protein design; membrane protein engineering; membrane proteins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29090504      PMCID: PMC5734395          DOI: 10.1002/pro.3335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  56 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Energy functions for protein design I: efficient and accurate continuum electrostatics and solvation.

Authors:  Navin Pokala; Tracy M Handel
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions.

Authors:  Ora Schueler-Furman; Chu Wang; Phil Bradley; Kira Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Multipass membrane protein structure prediction using Rosetta.

Authors:  Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy; Jack Schonbrun; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-03-01

6.  Positioning of proteins in membranes: a computational approach.

Authors:  Andrei L Lomize; Irina D Pogozheva; Mikhail A Lomize; Henry I Mosberg
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  An improved pairwise decomposable finite-difference Poisson-Boltzmann method for computational protein design.

Authors:  Christina L Vizcarra; Naigong Zhang; Shannon A Marshall; Ned S Wingreen; Chen Zeng; Stephen L Mayo
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Structure of a class C GPCR metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 bound to an allosteric modulator.

Authors:  Huixian Wu; Chong Wang; Karen J Gregory; Gye Won Han; Hyekyung P Cho; Yan Xia; Colleen M Niswender; Vsevolod Katritch; Jens Meiler; Vadim Cherezov; P Jeffrey Conn; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Design of native-like proteins through an exposure-dependent environment potential.

Authors:  Samuel DeLuca; Brent Dorr; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 10.  Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases.

Authors:  Mark A Lemmon; Joseph Schlessinger
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  10 in total

1.  Comparing side chain packing in soluble proteins, protein-protein interfaces, and transmembrane proteins.

Authors:  J C Gaines; S Acebes; A Virrueta; M Butler; L Regan; C S O'Hern
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2018-02-26

2.  Protein Structure Prediction and Design in a Biologically Realistic Implicit Membrane.

Authors:  Rebecca F Alford; Patrick J Fleming; Karen G Fleming; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Protein Design: From the Aspect of Water Solubility and Stability.

Authors:  Rui Qing; Shilei Hao; Eva Smorodina; David Jin; Arthur Zalevsky; Shuguang Zhang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 4.  De novo protein design, a retrospective.

Authors:  Ivan V Korendovych; William F DeGrado
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 5.318

5.  Diverse Scientific Benchmarks for Implicit Membrane Energy Functions.

Authors:  Rebecca F Alford; Rituparna Samanta; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 6.578

6.  Membrane Protein Engineering with Rosetta.

Authors:  Rebecca F Alford; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

7.  Computational structure prediction provides a plausible mechanism for electron transfer by the outer membrane protein Cyc2 from Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans.

Authors:  Virginia Jiang; Sagar D Khare; Scott Banta
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 6.993

8.  A lipophilicity-based energy function for membrane-protein modelling and design.

Authors:  Jonathan Yaacov Weinstein; Assaf Elazar; Sarel Jacob Fleishman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Upgraded molecular models of the human KCNQ1 potassium channel.

Authors:  Georg Kuenze; Amanda M Duran; Hope Woods; Kathryn R Brewer; Eli Fritz McDonald; Carlos G Vanoye; Alfred L George; Charles R Sanders; Jens Meiler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Molecular basis for the evolved instability of a human G-protein coupled receptor.

Authors:  Laura M Chamness; Nathan B Zelt; Haley R Harrington; Charles P Kuntz; Brian J Bender; Wesley D Penn; Joshua J Ziarek; Jens Meiler; Jonathan P Schlebach
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 9.423

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.