Literature DB >> 29427530

Comparing side chain packing in soluble proteins, protein-protein interfaces, and transmembrane proteins.

J C Gaines1,2, S Acebes3, A Virrueta2,3, M Butler4, L Regan2,5,6, C S O'Hern1,2,3,7,8.   

Abstract

We compare side chain prediction and packing of core and non-core regions of soluble proteins, protein-protein interfaces, and transmembrane proteins. We first identified or created comparable databases of high-resolution crystal structures of these 3 protein classes. We show that the solvent-inaccessible cores of the 3 classes of proteins are equally densely packed. As a result, the side chains of core residues at protein-protein interfaces and in the membrane-exposed regions of transmembrane proteins can be predicted by the hard-sphere plus stereochemical constraint model with the same high prediction accuracies (>90%) as core residues in soluble proteins. We also find that for all 3 classes of proteins, as one moves away from the solvent-inaccessible core, the packing fraction decreases as the solvent accessibility increases. However, the side chain predictability remains high (80% within 30°) up to a relative solvent accessibility, rSASA≲0.3, for all 3 protein classes. Our results show that ≈40% of the interface regions in protein complexes are "core", that is, densely packed with side chain conformations that can be accurately predicted using the hard-sphere model. We propose packing fraction as a metric that can be used to distinguish real protein-protein interactions from designed, non-binding, decoys. Our results also show that cores of membrane proteins are the same as cores of soluble proteins. Thus, the computational methods we are developing for the analysis of the effect of hydrophobic core mutations in soluble proteins will be equally applicable to analyses of mutations in membrane proteins.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hydrophobic amino acids; protein design; protein interfaces; protein structure prediction; protein-peptide interactions; protein-protein interactions; rotamer prediction; side chain dihedral angles; side chain repacking; transmembrane proteins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29427530      PMCID: PMC5912992          DOI: 10.1002/prot.25479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  84 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of cell transformation by papillomavirus E5 proteins.

Authors:  D DiMaio; D Mattoon
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-11-26       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Compensatory mutants of the bovine papillomavirus E5 protein and the platelet-derived growth factor β receptor reveal a complex direct transmembrane interaction.

Authors:  Anne P B Edwards; Yanhua Xie; Lara Bowers; Daniel DiMaio
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  VORO++: a three-dimensional voronoi cell library in C++.

Authors:  Chris H Rycroft
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.642

4.  Packing in protein cores.

Authors:  J C Gaines; A H Clark; L Regan; C S O'Hern
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.333

5.  Transmembrane glycine zippers: physiological and pathological roles in membrane proteins.

Authors:  Sanguk Kim; Tae-Joon Jeon; Amit Oberai; Duan Yang; Jacob J Schmidt; James U Bowie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Hydrophobicity of amino acid residues in globular proteins.

Authors:  G D Rose; A R Geselowitz; G J Lesser; R H Lee; M H Zehfus
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Dramatic destabilization of transmembrane helix interactions by features of natural membrane environments.

Authors:  Heedeok Hong; James U Bowie
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Statistical analysis of amino acid patterns in transmembrane helices: the GxxxG motif occurs frequently and in association with beta-branched residues at neighboring positions.

Authors:  A Senes; M Gerstein; D M Engelman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-02-25       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  The response of T4 lysozyme to large-to-small substitutions within the core and its relation to the hydrophobic effect.

Authors:  J Xu; W A Baase; E Baldwin; B W Matthews
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Cavities and atomic packing in protein structures and interfaces.

Authors:  Shrihari Sonavane; Pinak Chakrabarti
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  4 in total

1.  Void distributions reveal structural link between jammed packings and protein cores.

Authors:  John D Treado; Zhe Mei; Lynne Regan; Corey S O'Hern
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.529

2.  A threonine zipper that mediates protein-protein interactions: Structure and prediction.

Authors:  Curran Oi; John D Treado; Zachary A Levine; Christopher S Lim; Kirsten M Knecht; Yong Xiong; Corey S O'Hern; Lynne Regan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Analyses of protein cores reveal fundamental differences between solution and crystal structures.

Authors:  Zhe Mei; John D Treado; Alex T Grigas; Zachary A Levine; Lynne Regan; Corey S O'Hern
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2020-03-05

4.  Core packing of well-defined X-ray and NMR structures is the same.

Authors:  Alex T Grigas; Zhuoyi Liu; Lynne Regan; Corey S O'Hern
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 6.993

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.