Literature DB >> 16372357

Multipass membrane protein structure prediction using Rosetta.

Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy1, Jack Schonbrun, David Baker.   

Abstract

We describe the adaptation of the Rosetta de novo structure prediction method for prediction of helical transmembrane protein structures. The membrane environment is modeled by embedding the protein chain into a model membrane represented by parallel planes defining hydrophobic, interface, and polar membrane layers for each energy evaluation. The optimal embedding is determined by maximizing the exposure of surface hydrophobic residues within the membrane and minimizing hydrophobic exposure outside of the membrane. Protein conformations are built up using the Rosetta fragment assembly method and evaluated using a new membrane-specific version of the Rosetta low-resolution energy function in which residue-residue and residue-environment interactions are functions of the membrane layer in addition to amino acid identity, distance, and density. We find that lower energy and more native-like structures are achieved by sequential addition of helices to a growing chain, which may mimic some aspects of helical protein biogenesis after translocation, rather than folding the whole chain simultaneously as in the Rosetta soluble protein prediction method. In tests on 12 membrane proteins for which the structure is known, between 51 and 145 residues were predicted with root-mean-square deviation <4 A from the native structure. 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16372357      PMCID: PMC1479309          DOI: 10.1002/prot.20817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  69 in total

1.  kPROT: a knowledge-based scale for the propensity of residue orientation in transmembrane segments. Application to membrane protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Y Pilpel; N Ben-Tal; D Lancet
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-12-10       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server.

Authors:  L J McGuffin; K Bryson; D T Jones
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families.

Authors:  Richard Bonneau; Charlie E M Strauss; Carol A Rohl; Dylan Chivian; Phillip Bradley; Lars Malmström; Tim Robertson; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  PREDICT modeling and in-silico screening for G-protein coupled receptors.

Authors:  Sharon Shacham; Yael Marantz; Shay Bar-Haim; Ori Kalid; Dora Warshaviak; Noa Avisar; Boaz Inbal; Alexander Heifetz; Merav Fichman; Maya Topf; Zvi Naor; Silvia Noiman; Oren M Becker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-10-01

6.  Hydrophobic organization of membrane proteins.

Authors:  D C Rees; L DeAntonio; D Eisenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Are there dominant membrane protein families with a given number of helices?

Authors:  I T Arkin; A T Brünger; D M Engelman
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1997-08

9.  Novel scoring function for modeling structures of oligomers of transmembrane alpha-helices.

Authors:  Yungki Park; Markus Elsner; Rene Staritzbichler; Volkhard Helms
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-11-15

10.  A potential smoothing algorithm accurately predicts transmembrane helix packing.

Authors:  R V Pappu; G R Marshall; J W Ponder
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1999-01
View more
  171 in total

Review 1.  Toward the fourth dimension of membrane protein structure: insight into dynamics from spin-labeling EPR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Hassane S McHaourab; P Ryan Steed; Kelli Kazmier
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Structural basis for gating charge movement in the voltage sensor of a sodium channel.

Authors:  Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy; Paul G DeCaen; Ruth E Westenbroek; Chien-Yuan Pan; Todd Scheuer; David Baker; William A Catterall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Both sequence and context are important for flagellar targeting of a glucose transporter.

Authors:  Khoa D Tran; Dayana Rodriguez-Contreras; Ujwal Shinde; Scott M Landfear
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Replica exchange Monte-Carlo simulations of helix bundle membrane proteins: rotational parameters of helices.

Authors:  H-H Wu; C-C Chen; C-M Chen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 5.  Structure determination of membrane proteins in five easy pieces.

Authors:  Francesca M Marassi; Bibhuti B Das; George J Lu; Henry J Nothnagel; Sang Ho Park; Woo Sung Son; Ye Tian; Stanley J Opella
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.608

6.  Mapping the interaction site for a β-scorpion toxin in the pore module of domain III of voltage-gated Na(+) channels.

Authors:  Joel Z Zhang; Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy; Todd Scheuer; Izhar Karbat; Lior Cohen; Dalia Gordon; Michael Gurevitz; William A Catterall
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Recent Advances in the Application of Solution NMR Spectroscopy to Multi-Span Integral Membrane Proteins.

Authors:  Hak Jun Kim; Stanley C Howell; Wade D Van Horn; Young Ho Jeon; Charles R Sanders
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 9.795

8.  Determinants of Endoplasmic Reticulum-to-Lipid Droplet Protein Targeting.

Authors:  Maria-Jesus Olarte; Siyoung Kim; Morris E Sharp; Jessica M J Swanson; Robert V Farese; Tobias C Walther
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 12.270

9.  Identification of determinants required for agonistic and inverse agonistic ligand properties at the ADP receptor P2Y12.

Authors:  Philipp Schmidt; Lars Ritscher; Elizabeth N Dong; Thomas Hermsdorf; Maxi Cöster; Doreen Wittkopf; Jens Meiler; Torsten Schöneberg
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.436

10.  Computational and functional analyses of a small-molecule binding site in ROMK.

Authors:  Daniel R Swale; Jonathan H Sheehan; Sreedatta Banerjee; Afeef S Husni; Thuy T Nguyen; Jens Meiler; Jerod S Denton
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.