| Literature DB >> 29085019 |
F Vinale1,2, R Nicoletti3,4, F Borrelli5, A Mangoni5, O A Parisi5, R Marra4, N Lombardi6, F Lacatena4, L Grauso7, S Finizio5, M Lorito6,4, S L Woo6,5.
Abstract
In microbial cultures the production of secondary metabolites is affected by experimental conditions, and the discovery of novel compounds is often prevented by the re-isolation of known metabolites. To limit this, it is possible to cultivate microorganisms by simulating naturally occurring interactions, where microbes co-exist in complex communities. In this work, co-culturing experiments of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum M10 and the endophyteEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29085019 PMCID: PMC5662714 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14569-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Total Ion Chromatogram (TIC) in positive ion mode (m/z 100–1700 uma) of the culture filtrate of: (A) T. pinophilus (top); (B) co-culture (middle); (C) T. harzianum (bottom). The black arrow indicates the new peak observed only in the co-culture.
Secondary metabolites identified in the T. pinophilus/T. harzianum co-culture by LC-MS qTOF analysis. Identifications were confirmed by comparing results with known compounds present in an in-house database including over 4000 fungal secondary metabolites and selecting matching with a score ≥ 95%.
| Compound | Molecular formula | Exact Mass |
| RT (min) | Production in co-culture* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3-O-Methylfunicone | C20H20O8 | 388.1158 | 389.1231 [M+H]+ | 10.5 |
|
| 411.1049 [M+Na]+ | ||||||
| 427.0786 [M+K]+ | ||||||
| 799.2205 [2 M+Na]+ | ||||||
|
| Herquline B | C19H26N2O2 | 314.1994 | 315.2066 [M+H]+ | 8.2 |
|
|
| Ferrirubin | C41H67N9O17 | 957.4655 | 958.4718 [M+H]+ | 5.9 |
|
| 980.4529 [M+Na]+ | ||||||
|
| Ferricrocin | C28H47N9O13 | 717.3293 | 718.3365 [M+H]+ | 5.1 |
|
| 740.3178 [M+Na]+ | ||||||
|
| Coprogen B | C33H54N6O12 | 726.3804 | 727.3881 [M+H]+ | 5.3 |
|
| 749.3683 [M+Na]+ | ||||||
| 1453.7672 [2 M+H]+ | ||||||
|
| Dimerumic acid | C22H36N4O8 | 484.2531 | 485.2604 [M+H]+ | 5.4 |
|
| 507.2414 [M+Na]+ | ||||||
|
| Harzianic acid | C19H27NO6 | 365.1839 | 366.1914 [M+H]+ | 12.7 |
|
| 388.1731 [M+Na]+ | ||||||
| 404.1475 [M+K]+ | ||||||
| 753.3575 [2 M+Na]+ | ||||||
|
| Iso-harzianic acid | C19H27NO6 | 365.1839 | 366.1912 [M+H]+ | 11.5 |
|
| 388.1726 [M+Na]+ | ||||||
| 404.1467 [M+K]+ | ||||||
| 753.3563 [2 M+Na]+ | ||||||
|
| New metabolite (harziaphilic acid) | C11H17NO5 | 243.1108 | 244.1188 [M+H]+ | 5.9 |
|
| 266.0998 [M+Na]+ | ||||||
| 487.2289 [2 M+H]+ | ||||||
| 509.2102 [2 M+Na]+ | ||||||
|
| Trichoharzin | C25H38O7 | 450.2617 | 451.2693 [M+H]+ | 9.5 |
|
| 473.2507 [M+Na]+ | ||||||
| 489.2243 [M+K]+ | ||||||
| 923.5133 [2 M+Na]+ |
*Increased production of the metabolite in co-culture vs. single culture.
Decreased production of the metabolite in co-culture vs. single culture. ↔Unchanged production of the metabolite in co-culture vs. single culture.
ON: metabolite produced ex novo in co-culture.
Figure 2Chemical structures of 3-O-methylfunicone (1), herquline B (2), ferrirubin (3), ferricrocin (4), coprogen B (5), dimerumic acid (6), harzianic acid (7), iso-harzianic acid (8), the new metabolite named harziaphilic acid (9) and trichoharzin (10).
1H and 13C NMR spectral data of harziaphilic acid (9).
| Position |
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC (mult.) | δH (J in Hz) | HMBCa | ROESY | δC (mult.) | δH (J in Hz) | |
| 2 | 170.1 (C) | — | — | — | 173.6 (C) | — |
| 3 | 43.5 (CH2) | 2.49 (d, 17.1) | 2, 4, 5 | — | 44.3b | — |
| 2.42 (d, 17.1) | 2, 4 | — | ||||
| 4 | 107.1 (C) | — | — | — | 108.7 (C) | — |
| 5 | 69.8 (CH) | 3.79 (dd, 7.5, 3.1) | 2, 4, 7 | 6a, 6b, 11 | 71.6 (CH) | 3.98 (dd, 7.6, 3.1) |
| 6 | 34.4 (CH2) | 2.44 (dd, 14.0, 7.5) | 12 | 5, 6b | 2.68 (dd, 14.5, 7.6) | |
| 1.81 (dd, 14.0, 3.1) | 4, 5, 7, 8, 12 | 5, 6a, 8, 9, 10, 11 | 35.1 (CH2) | 2.05 (dd, 14.5, 3.1) | ||
| 7 | 91.2 (C) | — | — | — | 93.2 (C) | — |
| 8 | 33.2 (CH) | 2.03 (septet, 6.8) | 7, 9, 10, 12 | 6b, 9, 10 | 35.1 (CH) | 2.12 (septet, 6.9) |
| 9 | 17.5 (CH3) | 0.82 (d, 6.8) | 7, 8, 10 | 6b, 8 | 17.8 (CH3) | 0.91 (d, 6.9) |
| 10 | 16.6 (CH3) | 0.75 (d, 6.8) | 7, 8, 9 | 6b, 8 | 17.0 (CH3) | 0.85 (d, 6.9) |
| 11 | 26.7 (CH3) | 2.66 (s) | 2, 5 | 5, 6b | 27.7 (CH3) | 2.81 (s) |
| 12 | 176.4 (C) | — | — | — | 179.5 (C) | — |
Abbreviations: s, singlet; d, doublet; dd, doublet of doublets.
aHMBC correlations, optimized for 8.3 Hz, are from proton stated to the indicated carbon.
bδC determined from the HMBC experiment.
Figure 4Hemiacetals equilibrium of harziaphilic acid (9) and deuterium exchanges obtained after 3 days in CD3OD.
Figure 3The minimum energy conformer of compound 9 as determined by quantum mechanical calculations. Arrows represent the most significant correlations detected in the NOESY spectrum.
Figure 5Production of harziaphilic acid during the M10–TP1 co-culture, from 0 to 30 days. The amount of harziaphilic acid is expressed as peak area of the corresponding compound. Bars indicate standard deviation.
Figure 6Effect of harzianic acid (0.1–10 μM, 24-h exposure, (A) iso-harzianic acid (0.1–10 μM, 24-h exposure, (B) and harziaphilic acid (0.1–10 μM, 24-h exposure, (C) on Caco-2 cells proliferation. Proliferation rate (expressed as percentage) was studied using the 3H-thymidine incorporation assay. Each bar represents the mean ± standard errors mean of three independent experiments. **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 vs. control.
Figure 7Effect of harzianic acid (0.1–10 μM, 24-h exposure, (A) and harziaphilic acid (0.1–10 μM, 24-h exposure, (B) on cells proliferation performed on healthy human colonic epithelial cells (HCEC). Proliferation rate (expressed as percentage) was studied using the 3H-thymidine incorporation assay. Each bar represents the mean ± standard errors mean of three independent experiments.