Literature DB >> 29080002

How does patient-rated outcome change over time following the surgical treatment of degenerative disorders of the thoracolumbar spine?

Tamas F Fekete1, M Loibl2, D Jeszenszky2, D Haschtmann2, P Banczerowski3, F S Kleinstück2, H J Becker2, F Porchet2, A F Mannion4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient-rated measures are considered the gold standard for assessing the outcome of spine surgery, but there is no consensus on the appropriate timing of follow-up. Journals often demand a minimum 2-year follow-up, but the indiscriminate application of this principle may not be warranted. We examined the course of change in patient outcomes up to 5 years after surgery for degenerative spinal disorders.
METHODS: The data were evaluated from 4287 consecutive patients (2287 women, 2000 men; aged 62 ± 15 years) with degenerative disorders of the thoracolumbar spine, undergoing first-time surgery at the given level between 01/01/2005 and 31/12/2011. The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI; scored 0-10) was completed by 4012 (94%) patients preoperatively, 4008 (93%) at 3-month follow-up, 3897 (91%) at 1-year follow-up, 3736 (87%) at 2-year follow-up, and 3387 (79%) at 5-year follow-up. 2959 (69%) completed the COMI at all five time-points.
RESULTS: The individual COMI change scores from preoperatively to the various follow-up time-points showed significant correlations ranging from r = 0.50 (for change scores at the earliest vs the latest follow-up) to r = 0.75 (for change scores after 12- vs 24-month follow-up). Concordance with respect to whether the minimum clinically important change score was achieved at consecutive time-points was also good (70-82%). COMI decreased significantly (p < 0.05) from preop to 3 months (by 3.6 ± 2.8 points) and from 3 to 12 months (by 0.3 ± 2.4 points), then levelled off up to 5 years (0.04-0.05 point change; p > 0.05). The course of change up to 12 months differed slightly (p < 0.05) depending on pathology/whether fusion was carried out. For patients undergoing simple decompression, 3-month follow-up was sufficient; those undergoing fusion continued to show further slight but significant change up to 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Stable group mean COMI scores were observed for all patients from 12 months postoperatively onwards. The early postoperative results appeared to herald the longer term outcome. As such, a 'wait and see policy' in patients with a poor initial outcome at 3 months is not advocated. The insistence on a 2-year follow-up could result in a failure to intervene early to achieve better long-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Core Outcome Measures Index; Follow-up; Patient-rated outcomes; Spine degenerative disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29080002     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5358-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  17 in total

Review 1.  An AOA critical issue: aging of the North American population: new challenges for orthopaedics.

Authors:  Joseph A Buckwalter; James D Heckman; David P Petrie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Brett Hanscom; Jonathan S Skinner; William A Abdu; Alan S Hilibrand; Scott D Boden; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go?

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Achim Elfering; Ralph Staerkle; Astrid Junge; Dieter Grob; Norbert K Semmer; Nicola Jacobshagen; Jiri Dvorak; Norbert Boos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain.

Authors:  Montserrat Ferrer; Ferran Pellisé; Oscar Escudero; Luis Alvarez; Angels Pont; Jordi Alonso; Richard Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Benchmarking with Spine Tango: potentials and pitfalls.

Authors:  Christoph Röder; L Staub; D Dietrich; T Zweig; M Melloh; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index.

Authors:  A F Mannion; F Porchet; F S Kleinstück; F Lattig; D Jeszenszky; V Bartanusz; J Dvorak; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; F Porchet; F S Kleinstück; F Lattig; D Jeszenszky; V Bartanusz; J Dvorak; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; Emily A Blood; Anna N A Tosteson; Nancy Birkmeyer; Harry Herkowitz; Michael Longley; Lawrence Lenke; Sanford Emery; Serena S Hu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Influence of previous surgery on patient-rated outcome after surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Pascal Zehnder; Emin Aghayev; Tamas F Fekete; Daniel Haschtmann; Tim Pigott; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Do 1-year outcomes predict 2-year outcomes for adult deformity surgery?

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Frank Schwab; Keith H Bridwell; Christopher Shaffrey; William Horton; Serena Hu
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland Yearly European Spine Journal Review: A survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2018.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Does neck pain as chief complaint influence the outcome of cervical total disc replacement?

Authors:  S Finkenstaedt; A F Mannion; T F Fekete; D Haschtmann; F S Kleinstueck; U Mutter; H J Becker; D Bellut; F Porchet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Follow-up of degenerative lumbar spine surgery-PROMs stabilize after 1 year: an equivalence study based on Swespine data.

Authors:  C Parai; O Hägg; B Lind; H Brisby
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Minimum clinically important change for outcome scores among patients aged 75 or over undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Kosei Nagata; Hideki Nakamoto; So Kato; Yujiro Takeshita; Naohiro Kawamura; Takashi Ono; Akiro Higashikawa; Masayoshi Fukushima; Seiichi Azuma; Nobuhiro Hara; Hiroyuki Oka; Ko Matsudaira; Sakae Tanaka; Yasushi Oshima
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Development of a machine-learning based model for predicting multidimensional outcome after surgery for degenerative disorders of the spine.

Authors:  D Müller; D Haschtmann; T F Fekete; F Kleinstück; R Reitmeir; M Loibl; D O'Riordan; F Porchet; D Jeszenszky; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.721

6.  Onset of mental disorders in patients who developed failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Eloise Stanton; Zoe Fresquez; Eric J Muehlbauer; Jeffrey C Wang; Zorica Buser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 2.721

7.  Effect of diabetes on patient-reported outcome measures at one year after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Kosei Nagata; Junya Miyahara; Hideki Nakamoto; Naohiro Kawamura; Yujiro Takeshita; Akiro Higashikawa; Takashi Ono; Masayoshi Fukushima; Rentaro Okazaki; Nobuhiro Hara; So Kato; Toru Doi; Yuki Taniguchi; Yoshitaka Matsubayashi; Sakae Tanaka; Yasushi Oshima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Construct validity and responsiveness of commonly used patient reported outcome instruments in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Karthik Vishwanathan; Ian Braithwaite
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-01-13

9.  Diabetes is associated with greater leg pain and worse patient-reported outcomes at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Kosei Nagata; Hideki Nakamoto; Masahiko Sumitani; So Kato; Yuichi Yoshida; Naohiro Kawamura; Keiichiro Tozawa; Yujiro Takeshita; Hiroyuki Nakarai; Akiro Higashikawa; Masaaki Iizuka; Takashi Ono; Masayoshi Fukushima; Katsuyuki Sasaki; Rentaro Okazaki; Yusuke Ito; Nobuhiro Hara; Toru Doi; Yuki Taniguchi; Yoshitaka Matsubayashi; Sakae Tanaka; Yasushi Oshima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparison between microendoscopic laminectomy and open posterior decompression surgery for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nozomu Ohtomo; Hideki Nakamoto; Junya Miyahara; Yuichi Yoshida; Hiroyuki Nakarai; Keiichiro Tozawa; Masayoshi Fukushima; So Kato; Toru Doi; Yuki Taniguchi; Yoshitaka Matsubayashi; Akiro Higashikawa; Yujiro Takeshita; Naohiro Kawamura; Hirohiko Inanami; Sakae Tanaka; Yasushi Oshima
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.