Literature DB >> 18774752

Do 1-year outcomes predict 2-year outcomes for adult deformity surgery?

Steven D Glassman1, Frank Schwab, Keith H Bridwell, Christopher Shaffrey, William Horton, Serena Hu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures are being used more frequently in the evaluation of the adult deformity patient. This is due in part to the validation of the deformity-specific Scolios Research Society-22 (SRS-22). Hence, relationships between HRQOL outcomes and traditional measures of success such as deformity correction, fusion healing, and complications are being established.
PURPOSE: To examine the pattern of HRQOL outcome responses after adult deformity surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: Analysis of prospective multicenter cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE: Two hundred and eighty-three adult deformity patients with preoperative, 1-, and 2-year postoperative outcome measures. OUTCOME MEASURES: SRS-22, Short Form-12 (SF-12), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and back and leg pain numeric rating scale scores.
METHODS: Preoperative versus postoperative health status measures were evaluated by matched-pairs sample t test statistics and post hoc analysis of variance (ANOVA) findings.
RESULTS: SRS-22 improved from a mean 3.03 points at baseline to 3.21 points at 6 months, 3.71 points at 1 year, and 3.70 points at 2 years post-op. Mean ODI score was 37.0 points pre-op and improved to 27.0 points at 6 months, and 22.8 points at 1 and 2 years post-op. Mean SF-12 physical component score was 33.7 points at baseline, improving to 36.9 points at 6 months, 40.6 points at 1 year, and 40.5 points at 2 years post-op. Paired samples analysis comparing 6-month and 1-year post-op scores showed deterioration for numeric rating scale leg pain (p=0.05). There was a trend for improvement in SF-12 physical component score (p=0.06). Significant improvement between 6 months and 1 year post-op was noted for ODI (p=0.02) and SRS total score (p<0.0001). Comparison of 1- versus 2-year postoperative scores revealed no statistically significant differences for any of the HRQOL parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the application of HRQOL measures, including the deformity-specific SRS-22, as a valuable tool in the assessment of adult deformity patients. Change in outcome score stabilized after the 1-year postoperative interval, for most patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18774752     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.06.450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  11 in total

1.  Likelihood of reaching minimal clinically important difference in adult spinal deformity: a comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment.

Authors:  Shian Liu; Frank Schwab; Justin S Smith; Eric Klineberg; Christopher P Ames; Gregory Mundis; Richard Hostin; Khaled Kebaish; Vedat Deviren; Munish Gupta; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Robert A Hart; Shay Bess; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

2.  How does patient-rated outcome change over time following the surgical treatment of degenerative disorders of the thoracolumbar spine?

Authors:  Tamas F Fekete; M Loibl; D Jeszenszky; D Haschtmann; P Banczerowski; F S Kleinstück; H J Becker; F Porchet; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Does Clinical Photography Influence Satisfaction With Surgery in Adult Patients Operated on for Spinal Deformity?

Authors:  Alejandro Gomez-Rice; Cristina Madrid; Enrique Izquierdo; Fernando Marco-MartÍnez; JesÚs A F Tresguerres; Felisa Sanchez-Mariscal
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

4.  External validation of a prediction model for pain and functional outcome after elective lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Ayesha Quddusi; Hubert A J Eversdijk; Anita M Klukowska; Marlies P de Wispelaere; Julius M Kernbach; Marc L Schröder; Victor E Staartjes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Follow-up of degenerative lumbar spine surgery-PROMs stabilize after 1 year: an equivalence study based on Swespine data.

Authors:  C Parai; O Hägg; B Lind; H Brisby
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Adult degenerative scoliosis: comparison of patient-rated outcome after three different surgical treatments.

Authors:  F S Kleinstueck; T F Fekete; D Jeszenszky; D Haschtmann; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Do benefits overcome the risks related to surgery for adult scoliosis? A detailed analysis of a consecutive case series.

Authors:  Giovanni Barbanti Bròdano; Silvia Terzi; Alessandro Gasbarrini; Stefano Bandiera; Christiano Simoes; Stefano Boriani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Evidence and practice in spine registries.

Authors:  Miranda L van Hooff; Wilco C H Jacobs; Paul C Willems; Michel W J M Wouters; Marinus de Kleuver; Wilco C Peul; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Peter Fritzell
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Functional outcome of non-surgical and surgical management for de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a mean follow-up of 10 years.

Authors:  Sayf S A Faraj; Tsjitske M Haanstra; Hugo Martijn; Marinus de Kleuver; Barend J van Royen
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2017-12-05

10.  Functional outcomes following surgical treatment in patient with primary degenerative adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Yudha Mathan Sakti; Rezky Winda Saraswaty; Bagus Yudha Pratama; Aristida Cahyono Putra; Dwi Budhi Susanto; Akbar Mafaza; Anak Agung Ngurah Nata Baskara; Rahadyan Magetsari
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2021-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.