Literature DB >> 19487505

Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts.

James N Weinstein1, Jon D Lurie, Tor D Tosteson, Wenyan Zhao, Emily A Blood, Anna N A Tosteson, Nancy Birkmeyer, Harry Herkowitz, Michael Longley, Lawrence Lenke, Sanford Emery, Serena S Hu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of degenerative spondylolisthesis associated with spinal stenosis remains controversial. Surgery is widely used and has recently been shown to be more effective than nonoperative treatment when the results were followed over two years. Questions remain regarding the long-term effects of surgical treatment compared with those of nonoperative treatment.
METHODS: Surgical candidates from thirteen centers with symptoms of at least twelve weeks' duration as well as confirmatory imaging showing degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis were offered enrollment in a randomized cohort or observational cohort. Treatment consisted of standard decompressive laminectomy (with or without fusion) or usual nonoperative care. Primary outcome measures were the Short Form-36 (SF-36) bodily pain and physical function scores and the modified Oswestry Disability Index at six weeks, three months, six months, and yearly up to four years.
RESULTS: In the randomized cohort (304 patients enrolled), 66% of those randomized to receive surgery received it by four years whereas 54% of those randomized to receive nonoperative care received surgery by four years. In the observational cohort (303 patients enrolled), 97% of those who chose surgery received it whereas 33% of those who chose nonoperative care eventually received surgery. The intent-to-treat analysis of the randomized cohort, which was limited by nonadherence to the assigned treatment, showed no significant differences in treatment outcomes between the operative and nonoperative groups at three or four years. An as-treated analysis combining the randomized and observational cohorts that adjusted for potential confounders demonstrated that the clinically relevant advantages of surgery that had been previously reported through two years were maintained at four years, with treatment effects of 15.3 (95% confidence interval, 11 to 19.7) for bodily pain, 18.9 (95% confidence interval, 14.8 to 23) for physical function, and -14.3 (95% confidence interval, -17.5 to -11.1) for the Oswestry Disability Index. Early advantages (at two years) of surgical treatment in terms of the secondary measures of bothersomeness of back and leg symptoms, overall satisfaction with current symptoms, and self-rated progress were also maintained at four years.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients who are treated nonoperatively, patients in whom degenerative spondylolisthesis and associated spinal stenosis are treated surgically maintain substantially greater pain relief and improvement in function for four years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19487505      PMCID: PMC2686131          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  28 in total

1.  Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis.

Authors:  H N Herkowitz; L T Kurz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment Instrument: reliability and validity tests.

Authors:  L H Daltroy; W L Cats-Baril; J N Katz; A H Fossel; M H Liang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis.

Authors:  K H Bridwell; T A Sedgewick; M F O'Brien; L G Lenke; C Baldus
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1993-12

4.  Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  J N Katz; S J Lipson; L C Chang; S A Levine; A H Fossel; M H Liang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; J F Lu; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, Part III. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  S J Atlas; R A Deyo; R B Keller; A M Chapin; D L Patrick; J M Long; D E Singer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population.

Authors:  R A Deyo; M A Ciol; D C Cherkin; J D Loeser; S J Bigos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  A L Stewart; S Greenfield; R D Hays; K Wells; W H Rogers; S D Berry; E A McGlynn; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica.

Authors:  D L Patrick; R A Deyo; S J Atlas; D E Singer; A Chapin; R B Keller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  An assessment of surgery for spinal stenosis: time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations.

Authors:  M A Ciol; R A Deyo; E Howell; S Kreif
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  165 in total

1.  Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Anna Tosteson; Emily Blood; Harry Herkowitz; Frank Cammisa; Todd Albert; Scott D Boden; Alan Hilibrand; Harley Goldberg; Sigurd Berven; Howard An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The impact of diabetes on the outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of patients in the spine patient outcomes research trial.

Authors:  Mitchell K Freedman; Alan S Hilibrand; Emily A Blood; Wenyan Zhao; Todd J Albert; Alexander R Vaccaro; Christina V Oleson; Tamara S Morgan; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Surgery for adult spondylolisthesis: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Florian Ringel; Markus Quante; Sven O Eicker; Cathleen Muche-Borowski; Ralph Kothe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Minimally invasive laminectomy in spondylolisthetic lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  Ilias N Caralopoulos; Cuong J Bui
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

5.  Does the wait for lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis surgery have a detrimental effect on patient outcomes? A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Christopher S Bailey; Kevin R Gurr; Stewart I Bailey; David Taylor; M Patricia Rosas-Arellano; Corinne Tallon; Yves Bureau; Jennifer C Urquhart
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-04-28

6.  Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Pain and Functional Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Sara Khor; Danielle Lavallee; Amy M Cizik; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman; Christopher R Howe; Dawei Lu; A Alex Mohit; Rod J Oskouian; Jeffrey R Roh; Neal Shonnard; Armagan Dagal; David R Flum
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Indications for spine surgery: validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Richard A Deyo; Tor D Tosteson; James N Weinstein; Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of surgical outcome in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.

Authors:  Jon D Lurie; Rachel A Moses; Anna N A Tosteson; Tor D Tosteson; Eugene J Carragee; John A Carrino; Jay A Kaiser; Richard J Herzog
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The effect of race on outcomes of surgical or nonsurgical treatment of patients in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Jon D Lurie; Wenyan Zhao; Christopher M Bono
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  [Infections after reconstructive spinal interventions : How do I deal with them?]

Authors:  Burkhard Lehner; Michael Akbar; Nicholas A Beckmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.