Literature DB >> 26801193

Influence of previous surgery on patient-rated outcome after surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.

Pascal Zehnder1, Emin Aghayev2, Tamas F Fekete1, Daniel Haschtmann1, Tim Pigott3, Anne F Mannion4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Few studies have used multivariate models to quantify the effect of multiple previous spine surgeries on patient-oriented outcome after spine surgery. This study sought to quantify the effect of prior spine surgery on 12-month postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for different degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.
METHODS: The study included 4940 patients with lumbar degenerative disease documented in the Spine Tango Registry of EUROSPINE, the Spine Society of Europe, from 2004 to 2015. Preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively, patients completed the multidimensional Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI; 0-10 scale). Patients' medical history and surgical details were recorded using the Spine Tango Surgery 2006 and 2011 forms. Multiple linear regression models were used to investigate the relationship between the number of previous surgeries and the 12-month postoperative COMI score, controlling for the baseline COMI score and other potential confounders.
RESULTS: In the adjusted model including all cases, the 12-month COMI score showed a 0.37-point worse value [95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) 0.29-0.45; p < 0.001] for each additional prior spine surgery. In the subgroup of patients with lumbar disc herniation, the corresponding effect was 0.52 points (95 % CI 0.27-0.77; p < 0.001) and in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis, 0.40 points (95 % CI 0.17-0.64; p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: We were able to demonstrate a clear "dose-response" effect for previous surgery: the greater the number of prior spine surgeries, the systematically worse the outcome at 12 months' follow-up. The results of this study can be used when considering or consenting a patient for further surgery, to better inform the patient of the likely outcome and to set realistic expectations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COMI; Degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine; Patient-rated outcome; Previous surgery; Spine Tango

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26801193     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4383-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  35 in total

1.  Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Sohail K Mirza; Bryan A Comstock; Darryl T Gray; William Kreuter; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The influence of comorbidity on the risks and benefits of spine surgery for degenerative lumbar disorders.

Authors:  A F Mannion; T F Fekete; F Porchet; D Haschtmann; D Jeszenszky; F S Kleinstück
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Validity of the French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Stéphane Genevay; Marc Marty; Delphine S Courvoisier; Violaine Foltz; Geneviève Mahieu; Christophe Demoulin; Agnieszka Gierasimowicz Fontana; Michael Norberg; Pierre de Goumoëns; Christine Cedraschi; Sylvie Rozenberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Effect of body weight on spinal loads in various activities: a personalized biomechanical modeling approach.

Authors:  M Hajihosseinali; N Arjmand; A Shirazi-Adl
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease: nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Chi Heon Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Choon Seon Park; Boram Choi; Min Jung Kim; Byung Joo Park
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Does daily tobacco smoking affect outcomes after microdecompression for degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis? - A multicenter observational registry-based study.

Authors:  Sasha Gulati; Trond Nordseth; Ulf S Nerland; Michel Gulati; Clemens Weber; Charalampis Giannadakis; Øystein P Nygaard; Tore K Solberg; Ole Solheim; Asgeir S Jakola
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Relationship between preoperative expectations, satisfaction, and functional outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Alexandra Soroceanu; Alexander Ching; William Abdu; Kevin McGuire
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Eight year outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a comparison of reoperated and not reoperated patients.

Authors:  A Vik; J A Zwart; G Hulleberg; O P Nygaard
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index.

Authors:  A F Mannion; F Porchet; F S Kleinstück; F Lattig; D Jeszenszky; V Bartanusz; J Dvorak; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for the neck.

Authors:  Marco Monticone; Simona Ferrante; Serena Maggioni; Gisel Grenat; Giovanni A Checchia; Marco Testa; Marco G Teli; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  4 in total

1.  How does patient-rated outcome change over time following the surgical treatment of degenerative disorders of the thoracolumbar spine?

Authors:  Tamas F Fekete; M Loibl; D Jeszenszky; D Haschtmann; P Banczerowski; F S Kleinstück; H J Becker; F Porchet; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Patient-rated outcome after atlantoaxial (C1-C2) fusion: more than a decade of evaluation of 2-year outcomes in 126 patients.

Authors:  F S Kleinstück; T F Fekete; M Loibl; D Jeszenszky; D Haschtmann; F Porchet; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Can patient-reported profiles avoid unnecessary referral to a spine surgeon? An observational study to further develop the Nijmegen Decision Tool for Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Miranda L van Hooff; Johanna M van Dongen; Veerle M Coupé; Maarten Spruit; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Marinus de Kleuver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Clinical relevance of occult infections in spinal pseudarthrosis revision.

Authors:  Marco D Burkhard; Ali Hassanzadeh; Octavian Andronic; Tobias Götschi; Ilker Uçkay; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-09-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.