Olivia R Shull1, Christopher M Reilly2, Lola B Davis1, Christopher J Murphy1,3, Sara M Thomasy1,3. 1. Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA. 2. Insight Veterinary Specialty Pathology, Austin, TX. 3. Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal morphology using ultrasonic pachymetry (USP), Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT), and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in 2 related canine breeds-German shorthaired pointers (GSHPs) and German wirehaired pointers (GWHPs)-with and without corneal endothelial dystrophy (CED). This condition is characterized by premature endothelial cell degeneration leading to concomitant corneal edema and is similar to Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. METHODS: Corneas of 10 CED-affected (4 GSHP and 6 GWHP) and 19 unaffected, age-matched (15 GSHP and 4 GWHP) dogs were examined using USP, FD-OCT, and IVCM. A 2-sample t test or Mann-Whitney rank-sum test was used to statistically compare parameters between both groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD or median (range). RESULTS: Central corneal thickness determined using USP was significantly greater in CED-affected than in unaffected dogs at 1179 (953-1959) and 646 (497-737) μm, respectively (P < 0.001). Central epithelial thickness was found to be significantly decreased in CED-affected versus unaffected dogs at 47 ± 7.1 and 55 ± 7.1 μm, respectively (P = 0.011), using FD-OCT. With IVCM, corneal endothelial density was significantly less (P < 0.001) in 5 dogs with CED versus 19 unaffected controls at 499 ± 315 versus 1805 ± 298 cells/mm, respectively. CED-affected dogs exhibited endothelial pleomorphism and polymegethism, whereas CED-unaffected dogs had regular hexagonal arrangement of cells. CONCLUSIONS: GSHPs and GWHPs with CED exhibit marked differences in corneal morphology when compared with age-matched control dogs. These 2 CED-affected breeds represent spontaneous, large animal models for human Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.
PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal morphology using ultrasonic pachymetry (USP), Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT), and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in 2 related canine breeds-German shorthaired pointers (GSHPs) and German wirehaired pointers (GWHPs)-with and without corneal endothelial dystrophy (CED). This condition is characterized by premature endothelial cell degeneration leading to concomitant corneal edema and is similar to Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. METHODS: Corneas of 10 CED-affected (4 GSHP and 6 GWHP) and 19 unaffected, age-matched (15 GSHP and 4 GWHP) dogs were examined using USP, FD-OCT, and IVCM. A 2-sample t test or Mann-Whitney rank-sum test was used to statistically compare parameters between both groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD or median (range). RESULTS: Central corneal thickness determined using USP was significantly greater in CED-affected than in unaffected dogs at 1179 (953-1959) and 646 (497-737) μm, respectively (P < 0.001). Central epithelial thickness was found to be significantly decreased in CED-affected versus unaffected dogs at 47 ± 7.1 and 55 ± 7.1 μm, respectively (P = 0.011), using FD-OCT. With IVCM, corneal endothelial density was significantly less (P < 0.001) in 5 dogs with CED versus 19 unaffected controls at 499 ± 315 versus 1805 ± 298 cells/mm, respectively. CED-affected dogs exhibited endothelial pleomorphism and polymegethism, whereas CED-unaffected dogs had regular hexagonal arrangement of cells. CONCLUSIONS:GSHPs and GWHPs with CED exhibit marked differences in corneal morphology when compared with age-matched control dogs. These 2 CED-affected breeds represent spontaneous, large animal models for humanFuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.
Authors: Ann R Strom; Dennis E Cortés; Sara M Thomasy; Philip H Kass; Mark J Mannis; Christopher J Murphy Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 1.644
Authors: Ann R Strom; Dennis E Cortés; Carol A Rasmussen; Sara M Thomasy; Kim McIntyre; Shwu-Fei Lee; Philip H Kass; Mark J Mannis; Christopher J Murphy Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 1.644
Authors: Kathryn L Good; David J Maggs; Steven R Hollingsworth; Randall H Scagliotti; Richard W Nelson Journal: Am J Vet Res Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 1.156
Authors: Sara M Thomasy; Dennis E Cortes; Alyssa L Hoehn; Allison C Calderon; Jennifer Y Li; Christopher J Murphy Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: A L Hoehn; S M Thomasy; P H Kass; T Horikawa; M Samuel; O R Shull; K A Stewart; C J Murphy Journal: Vet J Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 2.688
Authors: Michelle Samuel; Sara M Thomasy; Allison S Calderon; Philip H Kass; Keith Collins; Christopher J Murphy Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 1.644
Authors: Hidetaka Miyagi; Amelia A Stanley; Tanvi J Chokshi; Carina Y Pasqualino; Alyssa L Hoehn; Christopher J Murphy; Sara M Thomasy Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2019-06-09 Impact factor: 1.444
Authors: Sangwan Park; Brian C Leonard; Vijay Krishna Raghunathan; Soohyun Kim; Jennifer Y Li; Mark J Mannis; Christopher J Murphy; Sara M Thomasy Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2021-08
Authors: Brian C Leonard; Celine S Kermanian; Sarah R Michalak; Philip H Kass; Steven R Hollingsworth; Kathryn L Good; David J Maggs; Sara M Thomasy Journal: Cornea Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 3.152
Authors: Sangwan Park; Lionel Sebbag; Bret A Moore; M Isabel Casanova; Brian C Leonard; Nicole L Daley; Kirsten A Steele; Jennifer Y Li; Christopher J Murphy; Sara M Thomasy Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2022-03-26 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Sarah R Michalak; Soohyun Kim; Sangwan Park; M Isabel Casanova; Morgan A W Bowman; Michelle Ferneding; Brian C Leonard; Kathryn L Good; Jennifer Y Li; Sara M Thomasy Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 3.048