Literature DB >> 29073044

SMELL-S and SMELL-R: Olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience.

Julien W Hsieh1,2, Andreas Keller3, Michele Wong3, Rong-San Jiang4, Leslie B Vosshall1,5,6.   

Abstract

Smell dysfunction is a common and underdiagnosed medical condition that can have serious consequences. It is also an early biomarker of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, where olfactory deficits precede detectable memory loss. Clinical tests that evaluate the sense of smell face two major challenges. First, human sensitivity to individual odorants varies significantly, so test results may be unreliable in people with low sensitivity to a test odorant but an otherwise normal sense of smell. Second, prior familiarity with odor stimuli can bias smell test performance. We have developed nonsemantic tests for olfactory sensitivity (SMELL-S) and olfactory resolution (SMELL-R) that use mixtures of odorants that have unfamiliar smells. The tests can be self-administered by healthy individuals with minimal training and show high test-retest reliability. Because SMELL-S uses odor mixtures rather than a single molecule, odor-specific insensitivity is averaged out, and the test accurately distinguished people with normal and dysfunctional smell. SMELL-R is a discrimination test in which the difference between two stimulus mixtures can be altered stepwise. This is an advance over current discrimination tests, which ask subjects to discriminate monomolecular odorants whose difference in odor cannot be quantified. SMELL-R showed significantly less bias in scores between North American and Taiwanese subjects than conventional semantically based smell tests that need to be adapted to different languages and cultures. Based on these proof-of-principle results in healthy individuals, we predict that SMELL-S and SMELL-R will be broadly effective in diagnosing smell dysfunction. Published under the PNAS license.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hyposmia; odor-specific insensitivity; olfaction; olfactory dysfunction; smell test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29073044      PMCID: PMC5664538          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1711415114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  48 in total

Review 1.  Olfactory exploration: State of the art.

Authors:  D T Nguyen; C Rumeau; P Gallet; R Jankowski
Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.080

2.  A pilot study of a traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test for application in Taiwan.

Authors:  Rong-San Jiang; Mao-Chang Su; Kai-Li Liang; Jiun-Yih Shiao; Shang-Heng Wu; Chung-Han Hsin
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.467

Review 3.  Olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases: is there a common pathological substrate?

Authors:  Richard L Doty
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 44.182

4.  Olfactory function in chemical workers exposed to acrylate and methacrylate vapors.

Authors:  B S Schwartz; R L Doty; C Monroe; R Frye; S Barker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  "Sniffin' sticks": screening of olfactory performance.

Authors:  G Kobal; T Hummel; B Sekinger; S Barz; S Roscher; S Wolf
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  Intranasal trigeminal detection of chemical vapors by humans.

Authors:  R L Doty
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1975-06

7.  Peripheral adaptive filtering in human olfaction? Three studies on prevalence and effects of olfactory training in specific anosmia in more than 1600 participants.

Authors:  Ilona Croy; Selda Olgun; Laura Mueller; Anna Schmidt; Marcus Muench; Cornelia Hummel; Guenter Gisselmann; Hanns Hatt; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Human olfactory lateralization requires trigeminal activation.

Authors:  Ilona Croy; Max Schulz; Anna Blumrich; Cornelia Hummel; Johannes Gerber; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Olfactory dysfunction in parkinsonism: a general deficit unrelated to neurologic signs, disease stage, or disease duration.

Authors:  R L Doty; D A Deems; S Stellar
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Effects of olfactory training: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Sorokowska; E Drechsler; M Karwowski; T Hummel
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.681

View more
  12 in total

1.  QnAs with Leslie B. Vosshall.

Authors:  Prashant Nair
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Development of the Spanish Version of Sniffin's Sticks Olfactory Identification Test: Normative Data and Validity of Parallel Measures.

Authors:  María Luisa Delgado-Losada; Jaime Bouhaben; Alice Helena Delgado-Lima
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-02-10

3.  Altered Functional Connectivity Strength of Primary Visual Cortex in Subjects with Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Chen-Xing Qi; Xin Huang; Yan Tong; Yin Shen
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.168

4.  Can Aromatherapy Make People Feel Better Throughout Exercise?

Authors:  Sungho Kwon; Jihoon Ahn; Hyunsoo Jeon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  An experimental model of Braak's pretangle proposal for the origin of Alzheimer's disease: the role of locus coeruleus in early symptom development.

Authors:  Abhinaba Ghosh; Sarah E Torraville; Bandhan Mukherjee; Susan G Walling; Gerard M Martin; Carolyn W Harley; Qi Yuan
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 6.982

6.  Identifying Treatments for Taste and Smell Disorders: Gaps and Opportunities.

Authors:  Joel D Mainland; Linda A Barlow; Steven D Munger; Sarah E Millar; M Natalia Vergara; Peihua Jiang; James E Schwob; Bradley J Goldstein; Shannon E Boye; Jeffrey R Martens; Donald A Leopold; Linda M Bartoshuk; Richard L Doty; Thomas Hummel; Jayant M Pinto; Casey Trimmer; Christine Kelly; Edmund A Pribitkin; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 7.  Olfactory dysfunction in aging and neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Xiuli Dan; Noah Wechter; Samuel Gray; Joy G Mohanty; Deborah L Croteau; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 11.788

8.  A network model of affective odor perception.

Authors:  Yingxuan Liu; Alexander Toet; Tanja Krone; Robin van Stokkum; Sophia Eijsman; Jan B F van Erp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Tracking traumatic head injuries with the chemical senses.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Thomas P Hettinger
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-03-22

Review 10.  Olfactory Dysfunction in Familial and Sporadic Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Bruce A Chase; Katerina Markopoulou
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.