Literature DB >> 1187843

Intranasal trigeminal detection of chemical vapors by humans.

R L Doty.   

Abstract

The majorityof 14 human observers lacking olfactory nerve function detected, by nasal inhalation, over one quarter of 31 chemicals commonly used in olfactory research. No major differences were noted between anosmic observers with and without documented anatomic, genetic, or physiologic etiology. Detected compounds differed significantly from nondetected ones on the basis of a number of chemical properties, including water solubility and molecular weight. Detection thresholds of the anosmics, established by a single staircase procedure, were approximately two log volume concentration steps above those of normals for two compounds examined. Exponents of power functions fitted to magnitude estimates of the anosmics did not differ significantly from those fitted to the estimates of matched normal controls. These data indicate the trigeminal nerve may play an important role in human nasal chemoreception and that effective trigeminal stimulants may be predictable on physicochemical grounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1187843     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(75)90081-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  22 in total

1.  Stimulus selection for intranasal sensory isolation: eugenol is an irritant.

Authors:  Paul M Wise; Charles J Wysocki; Johan N Lundström
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Sustained Immunosuppression Alters Olfactory Function in the MRL Model of CNS Lupus.

Authors:  Minesh Kapadia; Hui Zhao; Donglai Ma; Boris Sakic
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Odorous and pungent attributes of mixed and unmixed odorants.

Authors:  J E Cometto-Muñiz; S M Hernández
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-04

4.  Activation of the sensory irritant receptor by C7-C11 n-alkanes.

Authors:  U Kristiansen; G D Nielsen
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Reply to Croy and Hummel: Stereo smelling without involvement of nasal trigeminal function.

Authors:  Yuli Wu; Yuting Ye; Wen Zhou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Trigeminal sensitivity to contact chemical stimulation: a new method and some results.

Authors:  J D Prah; V A Benignus
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-01

7.  The effect of anosmia on smoking habits.

Authors:  R C Peatfield; J A Turner; R W Sillett; M W McNicol
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 8.  Local effects in the respiratory tract: relevance of subjectively measured irritation for setting occupational exposure limits.

Authors:  Josje H E Arts; Cees de Heer; Ruud A Woutersen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Intranasal localizability of odorants: influence of stimulus volume.

Authors:  J Frasnelli; T Hummel; J Berg; G Huang; R L Doty
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  SMELL-S and SMELL-R: Olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience.

Authors:  Julien W Hsieh; Andreas Keller; Michele Wong; Rong-San Jiang; Leslie B Vosshall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.