Literature DB >> 26457822

Peripheral adaptive filtering in human olfaction? Three studies on prevalence and effects of olfactory training in specific anosmia in more than 1600 participants.

Ilona Croy1, Selda Olgun2, Laura Mueller2, Anna Schmidt2, Marcus Muench2, Cornelia Hummel2, Guenter Gisselmann3, Hanns Hatt3, Thomas Hummel4.   

Abstract

Selective processing of environmental stimuli improves processing capacity and allows adaptive modulation of behavior. The thalamus provides an effective filter of central sensory information processing. As olfactory projections, however, largely bypass the thalamus, other filter mechanisms must consequently have evolved for the sense of smell. We investigated whether specific anosmia - the inability to perceive a specific odor whereas detection of other substances is unaffected - represents an effective peripheral filter of olfactory information processing. In contrast to previous studies, we showed in a sample of 1600 normosmic subjects, that specific anosmia is by no means a rare phenomenon. Instead, while the affected odor is highly individual, the general probability of occurrence of specific anosmia is close to 1. In addition, 25 subjects performed daily olfactory training sessions with enhanced exposure to their particular "missing" smells for the duration of three months. This resulted in a significant improvement of sensitivity towards the respective specific odors. We propose specific anosmia to occur as a rule, rather than an exception, in the sense of smell. The lack of perception of certain odors may constitute a flexible peripheral filter mechanism, which can be altered by exposure.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Filter; Odor; Olfaction; Perception; Periphery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26457822     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  14 in total

1.  [Specific anosmia as a principle of olfactory perception].

Authors:  I Croy; S Olgun; L Mueller; A Schmidt; M Muench; G Gisselmann; H Hatt; T Hummel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Olfaction as a marker for depression.

Authors:  Ilona Croy; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Anosmia-A Clinical Review.

Authors:  Sanne Boesveldt; Elbrich M Postma; Duncan Boak; Antje Welge-Luessen; Veronika Schöpf; Joel D Mainland; Jeffrey Martens; John Ngai; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  SMELL-S and SMELL-R: Olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience.

Authors:  Julien W Hsieh; Andreas Keller; Michele Wong; Rong-San Jiang; Leslie B Vosshall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Olfactory Perception in Relation to the Physicochemical Odor Space.

Authors:  Antonie Louise Bierling; Ilona Croy; Thomas Hummel; Gianaurelio Cuniberti; Alexander Croy
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-04-28

6.  Chemical complexity of odors increases reliability of olfactory threshold testing.

Authors:  Anna Oleszkiewicz; Robert Pellegrino; Katharina Pusch; Celine Margot; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Pregnancy reduces the perception of anxiety.

Authors:  Katrin T Lübke; Anne Busch; Matthias Hoenen; Benoist Schaal; Bettina M Pause
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Hedione Reduces Subjective Vicarious Stress.

Authors:  Anika Pützer; Martin Brüne; Hanns Hatt; Oliver T Wolf
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Empathic Cognitions Affected by Undetectable Social Chemosignals: An EEG Study on Visually Evoked Empathy for Pain in an Auditory and Chemosensory Context.

Authors:  Matthias Hoenen; Katrin T Lübke; Bettina M Pause
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 10.  Olfactory dysfunction revisited: a reappraisal of work-related olfactory dysfunction caused by chemicals.

Authors:  Sabine Werner; Eberhard Nies
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.646

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.