Literature DB >> 20109324

A pilot study of a traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test for application in Taiwan.

Rong-San Jiang1, Mao-Chang Su, Kai-Li Liang, Jiun-Yih Shiao, Shang-Heng Wu, Chung-Han Hsin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 40-item University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is the most widely used smell test in the world. Presently, culturally modified versions of this test are available in 12 languages. This study describes the first assessment of a prototype traditional Chinese version of the UPSIT (UPSIT-TC) for administration in Taiwan. The goals were to determine the efficacy of specific items for testing Taiwanese subjects and to establish normative adjustments to allow for the use of North American norms.
METHODS: The American version of the UPSIT and the UPSIT-TC were administered to 40 healthy Taiwanese subjects on two test occasions separated from one another by 2 weeks. One subject was excluded because of invalid data.
RESULTS: The mean UPSIT score was 28.3 (median, 28; SD, 3.8) for the first test administration and 28.5 (median, 28.0; SD, 4.4) for the second test administration. The mean UPSIT-TC score was 33.1 (median, 33.0; SD, 2.9) for the first administration and 32.8 (median, 33.0; SD, 3.6) for the second test administration. The UPSIT-TC scores were significantly higher than those of the UPSIT on both test occasions (p < 0.0001). Pearson correlations computed across the two test occasions were positive and statistically significant for both the UPSIT and the UPSIT-TC (respectively, r = 0.803 and 0.664; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: In accord with the modifications, the scores on the prototype UPSIT-TC were significantly higher than those on the American UPSIT when administered to a Taiwanese sample. Both versions of the UPSIT were stable across repeated test sessions.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20109324     DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy        ISSN: 1945-8932            Impact factor:   2.467


  17 in total

1.  Assessment of olfaction using the "i-smell" test in an Indian population: a pilot study.

Authors:  Neelima Gupta; P P Singh; Arun Goyal; Darvesh Bhatia
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-08-23

2.  Connecticut (CCCRC) Olfactory Test: Normative Values in 426 Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Bayram Veyseller; Berke Ozucer; Aysegul Batioglu Karaaltin; Yalcin Yildirim; Nazan Degirmenci; Fadlullah Aksoy; Orhan Ozturan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-02-27

3.  The association of bone, fingernail and blood manganese with cognitive and olfactory function in Chinese workers.

Authors:  Danelle Rolle-McFarland; Yingzi Liu; Farshad Mostafaei; S Elizabeth Zauber; Yuanzhong Zhou; Yan Li; Qiyuan Fan; Wei Zheng; Linda H Nie; Ellen M Wells
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  SMELL-S and SMELL-R: Olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience.

Authors:  Julien W Hsieh; Andreas Keller; Michele Wong; Rong-San Jiang; Leslie B Vosshall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  University of pennsylvania smell identification on Iranian population.

Authors:  Seyed Kamran Kamrava; Mohammad Farhadi; Maryam Jalessi; Babak Khosravian; Behzad Pousti; Ebrahim Amin Tehran; Mohsen Rezaee Hemami
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 0.611

6.  Olfactory loss after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty: a report of two cases with review of the literature.

Authors:  Rong-San Jiang; Yi-Hao Chang
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-31

7.  A new cultural adaptation of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.

Authors:  Marco Aurélio Fornazieri; Richard L Doty; Clayson Alan dos Santos; Fábio de Rezende Pinna; Thiago Freire Pinto Bezerra; Richard Louis Voegels
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Validation of the applicability of the traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Rong-San Jiang; Li-Te Kuo; Shang-Heng Wu; Mao-Chang Su; Kai-Li Liang
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2014-01

9.  Evaluation of Culturally-Familiar Odorants for a Persian Smell Identification Test.

Authors:  Seyed Kamran Kamrava; Maryam Jalessi; Shaghayegh Ebrahimnejad; Sahand Ghalehbaghi; Elahe Amini; Alimohamad Asghari; Farhad Rafiei; Mohammad Farhadi
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-01

10.  Validity and Reliability of Persian Smell Identification Test.

Authors:  Seyed Kamran Kamrava; Maryam Jalessi; Sahand Ghalehbaghi; Elahe Amini; Rafieh Alizadeh; Farhad Rafiei; Sadaf Moosa; Mohammad Farhadi
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.