Literature DB >> 29067579

Trends in the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery® (FLS) certification exam over the past 9 years.

Elif Bilgic1, Pepa Kaneva1, Allan Okrainec2, E Matthew Ritter3, Steven D Schwaitzberg4, Melina C Vassiliou5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery® (FLS) certification exam assesses both cognitive and manual skills, and has been administered for over a decade. The purpose of this study is to report results over the past 9 years of testing in order to identify trends over time and evaluate the need to update scoring practices. This is a quality initiative of the SAGES FLS committee.
METHODS: A representative sample of FLS exam data from 2008 to 2016 was analyzed. The de-identified data included demographics and scores for the cognitive and manual tests. Standard descriptive statistics were used to compare trends over the years, training levels, and to assess the pass/fail rate.
RESULTS: A total of 7232 FLS tests were analyzed [64% male, 6.4% junior (postgraduate year-PGY1-2), 84% senior (PGY3-5), 2.8% fellows (PGY6), and 6.7% attending surgeons (PGY7)]. Specialties included 93% general surgery (GS), 6.2% gynecology, and 0.9% urology. The Pearson correlation between cognitive and manual scores was 0.09. For the cognitive exam, there was an increase in scores over the years, and the most junior residents scored the lowest. For the manual skills, there were marginal differences in scores over the years, and junior residents scored the highest. The odds ratio of PGY3+ passing was 1.8 (CI 1.2-2.8) times higher than that of a PGY1-2. The internal consistency between tasks on the manual skills exam was 0.73. If any one of the tasks was removed, the Cronbach's alpha dropped to between 0.65 and 0.71, depending on the task being removed.
CONCLUSION: The cognitive and manual components of FLS test different aspects of laparoscopy and demonstrate evidence for reliability and validity. More experienced trainees have a higher likelihood of passing the exam and tend to perform better on the cognitive skills. Each component of the manual skills contributes to the exam and should continue to be part of the test.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery; Laparoscopy; Simulation; Skill assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29067579     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5907-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters; Gerald M Fried; Lee L Swanstrom; Nathaniel J Soper; Lelan F Sillin; Bruce Schirmer; Kaaren Hoffman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Evaluating laparoscopic skills: setting the pass/fail score for the MISTELS system.

Authors:  S A Fraser; D R Klassen; L S Feldman; G A Ghitulescu; D Stanbridge; G M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman; Melina C Vassiliou; Shannon A Fraser; Donna Stanbridge; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Christopher G Andrew
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  FLS and FES: comprehensive models of training and assessment.

Authors:  Melina C Vassiliou; Brian J Dunkin; Jeffrey M Marks; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Trends and results of the first 5 years of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) certification testing.

Authors:  Allan Okrainec; Nathaniel J Soper; Lee L Swanstrom; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Beta test results of a new system assessing competence in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Lee L Swanstrom; Gerald M Fried; Kaaren I Hoffman; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  The MISTELS program to measure technical skill in laparoscopic surgery : evidence for reliability.

Authors:  M C Vassiliou; G A Ghitulescu; L S Feldman; D Stanbridge; K Leffondré; H H Sigman; G M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  FLS assessment of competency using simulated laparoscopic tasks.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Certification pass rate of 100% for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency-based training.

Authors:  Daniel J Scott; E Matt Ritter; Seifu T Tesfay; Elisabeth A Pimentel; Alykhan Nagji; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  A M Derossis; G M Fried; M Abrahamowicz; H H Sigman; J S Barkun; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.565

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Association of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Certification With Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Performed by Surgical Residents.

Authors:  Emily D Dubina; Xuan-Binh D Pham; Alexander C Schwed; Hoover Wu; Imani McElroy; Amy H Kaji; Christian de Virgilio
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 2.  The Future in Standards of Care for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery to Improve Training and Education.

Authors:  Vlad I Tica; Andrei A Tica; Rudy L De Wilde
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Identifying the needs for teaching fundamental knowledge of laparoscopic surgery: a cross-sectional study in Japan.

Authors:  Shinichiro Yokoyama; Yusuke Watanabe; Yo Kurashima; Akihiko Oshita; Yuji Nishizawa; Takeshi Naitoh; Fumitaka Nakamura; Satoru Kikuchi; Kazuhiro Noma; Saseem Poudel; Akihiro Suzuki; Yuichi Nishihara; Masaaki Ito; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Cleft Lip Repair Competence Can Be Evaluated with High-fidelity Simulation.

Authors:  Carolyn R Rogers-Vizena; Caroline A Yao; Georgios D Sideridis; Lindsey Minahan; Francesca Y L Saldanha; Katie A Livingston; Peter H Weinstock
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-07-22

5.  Simulation in Cleft Surgery.

Authors:  Rami S Kantar; Allyson R Alfonso; Elie P Ramly; J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso; Corstiaan C Breugem; Roberto L Flores
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-09-23

6.  The Fun Factor: Does Serious Gaming Affect the Volume of Voluntary Laparoscopic Skills Training?

Authors:  Wouter Martijn IJgosse; Harry van Goor; Camiel Rosman; Jan-Maarten Luursema
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.