| Literature DB >> 29066836 |
Tao Jiang1,2, Ben Long1,2, Hui Gong1,2, Tonghui Xu1,2, Xiangning Li1,2, Zhuonan Duan1,2, Anan Li1,2, Lei Deng1,2, Qiuyuan Zhong1,2, Xue Peng1,2, Jing Yuan3,4.
Abstract
A neural circuit is a structural-functional unit of achieving particular information transmission and processing, and have various inputs, outputs and molecular phenotypes. Systematic acquisition and comparative analysis of the molecular features of neural circuits are crucial to elucidating the operating mechanisms of brain function. However, no efficient, systematic approach is available for describing the molecular phenotypes of specific neural circuits at the whole brain scale. In this study, we developed a rapid whole-brain optical tomography method and devised an efficient approach to map brain-wide structural and molecular information in the same brain: rapidly imaging and sectioning the whole brain as well as automatically collecting all slices; conveniently selecting slices of interest through quick data browsing and then performing post hoc immunostaining of selected slices. Using this platform, we mapped the brain-wide distribution of inputs to motor, sensory and visual cortices and determined their molecular phenotypes in several subcortical regions. Our platform significantly enhances the efficiency of molecular phenotyping of neural circuits and provides access to automation and industrialization of cell type analyses for specific circuits.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29066836 PMCID: PMC5654830 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14360-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Phenotyping brain-wide neural circuits. (a) Presentation of the whole pipeline. (b) Schematic of the rapid whole-brain optical tomography system with automatic slice collection. (c) and (d) Typical coronal images of propidium iodide (PI)-stained 2 M C57BL/6 J mouse brains acquired by the system before and after optimization. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 2Automatic slice collection of imaging a Thy1-eYFP H-line mouse brain. (a) The brain was imaged by our system as 272 coronal sections at an interval of 50 μm, and all imaged tissue slices were sequentially collected during data acquisition. (b) All collected slices were placed on the slides and imaged with a Nikon Eclipse Ni-E wide-field microscope one-by-one manually. Blue and green represent 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining and YFP-labelled images of the collected slices, respectively. All images are arranged according to the corresponding in situ images, and the blank areas represent the missing slices. Enlarged views of the hippocampal coronal plane are indicated by white rectangles in row 9 and column 10. (c) An in situ image during whole-brain imaging with our system, and (d) the image of the corresponding collected slice imaged with a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope. Scale bars in (c) and (d) are 1 mm.
Figure 3Whole-brain mapping of inputs to MOp, SSp and VISp. (a) Schematic of direct inputs to targeted areas using stereotaxic injections of CAV-Cre. Left side shows the gene elements of the Ai14 Cre-reporter mouse and CAV-Cre used in a labelling experiment. Right side shows that CAV-Cre was injected into the targeted area of a mouse brain. (b) Whole-brain volume rendering of the inputs to MOp, SSp and VISp. (c,d) Quantification of the brain-wide inputs in cortical and subcortical brain areas to MOp, SSp and VISp. Error bars represent SEM. Others represent all other input regions. The significant differences between pairs are indicated by the p value (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001). Injection sites were excluded from the data analysis.
Abbreviations for anatomical structures.
| Abbreviation | Definition | Abbreviation | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Cortical plate |
| Thalamus |
| ACA | Anterior cingulate area | VAL | Ventral anterior-lateral complex |
| PL | Prelimbic area | VM | Ventral medial nucleus |
| SSp | Primary somatosensory area | VP | Ventral posterior complex |
| SSs | Supplemental somatosensory area | LGd | Dorsal part of the lateral geniculatecomplex |
| GU | Gustatory areas | LP | Lateral posterior nucleus |
| VISC | Visceral area | PO | Posterior complex |
| Mop | Primary motor area | AM | Anteromedial nucleus |
| MOs | Secondary motor area | LD | Lateral dorsal nucleus |
| AUD | Auditory areas | MD | Mediodorsal nucleus |
| VIS | Visual areas | RE | Nucleus of reunions |
| ILA | Infralimbic area | RH | Rhomboid nucleus |
| ORB | Orbital area | CM | Central medial nucleus |
| AI | Agranular insular area | PF | Parafascicular nucleus |
| RSP | Retrosplenial area |
| Hypothalamus |
| PTLp | Posterior parietal association areas | LHA | Lateral hypothalamic area |
| Tea | Temporal association areas |
| Midbrain |
| PERI | Perirhinal area | SC | Superior colliculus |
| ECT | Ectorhinal area | VTA | Ventral tegmental area |
| ENTl | Entorhinal area, lateral part | PAG | Periaqueductal gray |
|
| Cortical subplate | DR | Dorsal nucleus raphe |
| CLA | Claustrum |
| Hindbrain |
| BLA | Basolateral amygdalar nucleus | LC | Locus ceruleus |
|
| Pallidum | ||
| SI | Substantia innominata | ||
| MS | Medial septal nucleus | ||
| NDB | Diagonal band nucleus |
Figure 4Characterizing the molecular phenotypes of input neurons projecting to MOp, SSp and VISp in LC and PAL. (a) tdTomato-labelled LC slices with TH immunostaining. The hollow arrowheads show the co-localization of tdTomato-labelled input neurons and TH+ neurons. (b) The percentage of tdTomato-labelled input neurons in LC that express TH. (c) tdTomato-labelled PAL slices with ChAT and CB or ChAT and PV dual immunostaining. Hollow arrowheads show tdTomato-labelled input neurons co-localizing with ChAT +/CB+; solid arrowheads indicate the co-localization of tdTomato-labelled input neurons and ChAT+/PV- neurons; and arrows show the PV + neurons without tdTomato-labelled co-localization. (d) The percentage of tdTomato-labelled input neurons in the subregions of PAL: MOp-targeted and SSp-targeted input neurons in SI, and VISp-targeted input neurons in NDB. Data represent the mean ± SEM. The significant differences between pairs (MOp-targeted vs. SSp-targeted in SI) are indicated by the p value (Unpaired two-tail t-tests, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001). Scale bars: 50 μm. Blue, red and green represent MOp-targeted, SSp-targeted and VISp-targeted neurons, respectively.