To access outcome following hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), survivors without cerebral palsy were invited for formal developmental assessment. Children aged ≥ 42 months were assessed using the NEPSY-2, Movement Assessment Battery for Children 2 (Movement ABC-2), Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, and the Child Behavior Checklist. Children aged < 42 months were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSITD-3). One hundred forty-six children attended for assessments [Grade 1 (112), Grade 2 (33), and Grade 3 (1)]. BSITD-3 did not identify significant rates of impairment on cognitive, motor, or language subtests. A significant proportion of children scored < 3rd percentile on the adaptive behavior scale. In older age groups, difficulties were seen in 16/24 NEPSY-2 subtests and on timed assessments using Movement ABC-2. Difficulties arose especially in the "control" aspects of cognition and behavior. Behavioral difficulties were common with internalizing problems predominating. There was a graded effect with grade 2 cases differing significantly from grade 1 cases. CONCLUSION: Following HIE, children may experience attention, memory, and behavior difficulties which are not always evident at a young age. The adaptive behavior questionnaire may be a useful tool to select children requiring developmental surveillance beyond 2 years of age. What is known: • Diversity of outcome across grades of HIE is reported and few studies have looked at the milder consequences of HIE at school age. What is new: • Following HIE children may experience attention, memory, and behavior difficulties which are not always evident at a young age. • The adaptive behavior questionnaire may be a useful tool to select children requiring developmental surveillance beyond 2 years of age.
To access outcome following hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), survivors without cerebral palsy were invited for formal developmental assessment. Children aged ≥ 42 months were assessed using the NEPSY-2, Movement Assessment Battery for Children 2 (Movement ABC-2), Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, and the Child Behavior Checklist. Children aged < 42 months were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSITD-3). One hundred forty-six children attended for assessments [Grade 1 (112), Grade 2 (33), and Grade 3 (1)]. BSITD-3 did not identify significant rates of impairment on cognitive, motor, or language subtests. A significant proportion of children scored < 3rd percentile on the adaptive behavior scale. In older age groups, difficulties were seen in 16/24 NEPSY-2 subtests and on timed assessments using Movement ABC-2. Difficulties arose especially in the "control" aspects of cognition and behavior. Behavioral difficulties were common with internalizing problems predominating. There was a graded effect with grade 2 cases differing significantly from grade 1 cases. CONCLUSION: Following HIE, children may experience attention, memory, and behavior difficulties which are not always evident at a young age. The adaptive behavior questionnaire may be a useful tool to select children requiring developmental surveillance beyond 2 years of age. What is known: • Diversity of outcome across grades of HIE is reported and few studies have looked at the milder consequences of HIE at school age. What is new: • Following HIE children may experience attention, memory, and behavior difficulties which are not always evident at a young age. • The adaptive behavior questionnaire may be a useful tool to select children requiring developmental surveillance beyond 2 years of age.
Authors: Nadia Badawi; Glenys Dixon; Janine F Felix; John M Keogh; Beverly Petterson; Fiona J Stanley; Jennifer J Kurinczuk Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Seetha Shankaran; Abbot R Laptook; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Jon E Tyson; Scott A McDonald; Edward F Donovan; Avroy A Fanaroff; W Kenneth Poole; Linda L Wright; Rosemary D Higgins; Neil N Finer; Waldemar A Carlo; Shahnaz Duara; William Oh; C Michael Cotten; David K Stevenson; Barbara J Stoll; James A Lemons; Ronnie Guillet; Alan H Jobe Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-10-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Barnett; E Mercuri; M Rutherford; L Haataja; M F Frisone; S Henderson; F Cowan; L Dubowitz Journal: Neuropediatrics Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 1.947
Authors: Breda C Hayes; Sharon Cooley; Jennifer Donnelly; Elaine Doherty; Andrea Grehan; Cathy Madigan; Cliona McGarvey; Siobhan Mulvany; Stephanie Ryan; John Gillian; Michael P Geary; Tom G Matthews; Mary D King Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2012-07-12 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: Sarah J Doran; Mike Jandzinski; Anthony Patrizz; Cassandra Trammel; Romana Sharmeen; Abdullah A Mamun; Lori A Capozzi; Venugopal Reddy Venna; Fudong Liu; Louise D McCullough Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2019-04-29 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Jessika F van Hoorn; Marina M Schoemaker; Ilse Stuive; Pieter U Dijkstra; Francisca Rodrigues Trigo Pereira; Corry K van der Sluis; Mijna Hadders-Algra Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2020-12-20 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Kim V Annink; Linda S de Vries; Floris Groenendaal; Rian M J C Eijsermans; Manouk Mocking; Monique M J van Schooneveld; Jeroen Dudink; Henrica L M van Straaten; Manon J N L Benders; Maarten Lequin; Niek E van der Aa Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Qiang Zheng; Juan Sebastian Martin-Saavedra; Sandra Saade-Lemus; Arastoo Vossough; Giulio Zuccoli; Fabrício Guimarães Gonçalves; Colbey W Freeman; Minhui Ouyang; Varun Singh; Michael A Padula; Sara B Demauro; John Flibotte; Eric C Eichenwald; John A Detre; Raymond Wang Sze; Hao Huang; Misun Hwang Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 3.418