OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of the third edition of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley-III) to detect developmental delay in 2-year-old children who were extremely preterm and those carried to term. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: The state of Victoria, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects were consecutive surviving children who were born either at less than 28 weeks' gestational age (extremely preterm) or with less than 1000 g birth weight (extremely low-birth-weight; n = 221) in the state of Victoria, Australia, in 2005 and randomly selected controls who were both carried to term and of normal birth weight (n = 220). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Children were assessed by psychologists blinded to knowledge of group at 2 years of age, corrected for prematurity with the new Bayley-III scale. RESULTS: Follow-up rates of both cohorts were high (>92%). Mean values for all composite and subtest scores for the extremely preterm/extremely low-birth-weight group were significantly below those of the control group (P < .001), with the magnitude of all group differences being in excess of two-thirds SD. Mean values for the extremely preterm/extremely low-birth-weight group approached the normative mean, but in contrast, the mean values for the control group were higher than expected, with composite scores being between 0.55 and 1.23 SD above the normative mean. Proportions of children with developmental delay were grossly underestimated using the reference values, but were within the expected range when computed relative to the mean (standard deviation) for the controls. CONCLUSION: The Bayley-III scale seriously underestimates developmental delay in 2-year-old Australian children.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of the third edition of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley-III) to detect developmental delay in 2-year-old children who were extremely preterm and those carried to term. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: The state of Victoria, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects were consecutive surviving children who were born either at less than 28 weeks' gestational age (extremely preterm) or with less than 1000 g birth weight (extremely low-birth-weight; n = 221) in the state of Victoria, Australia, in 2005 and randomly selected controls who were both carried to term and of normal birth weight (n = 220). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Children were assessed by psychologists blinded to knowledge of group at 2 years of age, corrected for prematurity with the new Bayley-III scale. RESULTS: Follow-up rates of both cohorts were high (>92%). Mean values for all composite and subtest scores for the extremely preterm/extremely low-birth-weight group were significantly below those of the control group (P < .001), with the magnitude of all group differences being in excess of two-thirds SD. Mean values for the extremely preterm/extremely low-birth-weight group approached the normative mean, but in contrast, the mean values for the control group were higher than expected, with composite scores being between 0.55 and 1.23 SD above the normative mean. Proportions of children with developmental delay were grossly underestimated using the reference values, but were within the expected range when computed relative to the mean (standard deviation) for the controls. CONCLUSION: The Bayley-III scale seriously underestimates developmental delay in 2-year-old Australian children.
Authors: James L Wynn; Sylvia Tan; Marie G Gantz; Abhik Das; Ronald N Goldberg; Ira Adams-Chapman; Barbara J Stoll; Seetha Shankaran; Michele C Walsh; Kathy J Auten; Nancy A Miller; Pablo J Sánchez; Rosemary D Higgins; C Michael Cotten; P Brian Smith; Daniel K Benjamin Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Noelle Younge; Ricki F Goldstein; Carla M Bann; Susan R Hintz; Ravi M Patel; P Brian Smith; Edward F Bell; Matthew A Rysavy; Andrea F Duncan; Betty R Vohr; Abhik Das; Ronald N Goldberg; Rosemary D Higgins; C Michael Cotten Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Julia Krushkal; Laura E Murphy; Frederick B Palmer; J Carolyn Graff; Thomas R Sutter; Khyobeni Mozhui; Collin A Hovinga; Fridtjof Thomas; Vicki Park; Frances A Tylavsky; Ronald M Adkins Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: An N Massaro; Taeun Chang; Stephen Baumgart; Robert McCarter; Karin B Nelson; Penny Glass Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Deborah L Harris; Jane M Alsweiler; Judith M Ansell; Gregory D Gamble; Benjamin Thompson; Trecia A Wouldes; Tzu-Ying Yu; Jane E Harding Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2015-11-21 Impact factor: 4.406