Literature DB >> 29056455

Genetic Coupling of Female Mate Choice with Polygenic Ecological Divergence Facilitates Stickleback Speciation.

Rachael A Bay1, Matthew E Arnegard2, Gina L Conte3, Jacob Best3, Nicole L Bedford3, Shaugnessy R McCann4, Matthew E Dubin4, Yingguang Frank Chan5, Felicity C Jones5, David M Kingsley5, Dolph Schluter3, Catherine L Peichel6.   

Abstract

Ecological speciation with gene flow is widespread in nature [1], but it presents a conundrum: how are associations between traits under divergent natural selection and traits that contribute to assortative mating maintained? Theoretical models suggest that genetic mechanisms inhibiting free recombination between loci underlying these two types of traits (hereafter, "genetic coupling") can facilitate speciation [2-4]. Here, we perform a direct test for genetic coupling by mapping both divergent traits and female mate choice in a classic model of ecological speciation: sympatric benthic and limnetic threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). By measuring mate choice in F2 hybrid females, we allowed for recombination between loci underlying assortative mating and those under divergent ecological selection. In semi-natural mating arenas in which females had access to both benthic and limnetic males, we found that F2 females mated with males similar to themselves in body size and shape. In addition, we found two quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with female mate choice that also predicted female morphology along the benthic-limnetic trait axis. Furthermore, a polygenic genetic model that explains adaptation to contrasting benthic and limnetic feeding niches [5] also predicted F2 female mate choice. Together, these results provide empirical evidence that genetic coupling of assortative mating with traits under divergent ecological selection helps maintain species in the face of gene flow, despite a polygenic basis for adaptation to divergent environments.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  QTL; assortative mating; ecological speciation; female mate choice; genetic coupling; threespine stickleback

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29056455      PMCID: PMC5687276          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  31 in total

Review 1.  A framework for comparing processes of speciation in the presence of gene flow.

Authors:  Carole M Smadja; Roger K Butlin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Towards unbiased parentage assignment: combining genetic, behavioural and spatial data in a Bayesian framework.

Authors:  J D Hadfield; D S Richardson; T Burke
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 3.  Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative.

Authors:  Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Sexual imprinting on ecologically divergent traits leads to sexual isolation in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Genevieve M Kozak; Megan L Head; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Experimental confirmation that body size determines mate preference via phenotype matching in a stickleback species pair.

Authors:  Gina L Conte; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Historical contingency and ecological determinism interact to prime speciation in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus.

Authors:  E B Taylor; J D McPhail
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Contrasting hybridization rates between sympatric three-spined sticklebacks highlight the fragility of reproductive barriers between evolutionarily young species.

Authors:  Jennifer L Gow; Catherine L Peichel; Eric B Taylor
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Pervasive genetic associations between traits causing reproductive isolation in Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Richard M Merrill; Bas Van Schooten; Janet A Scott; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Female mate preferences for male body size and shape promote sexual isolation in threespine sticklebacks.

Authors:  Megan L Head; Genevieve M Kozak; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks.

Authors:  Felicity C Jones; Manfred G Grabherr; Yingguang Frank Chan; Pamela Russell; Evan Mauceli; Jeremy Johnson; Ross Swofford; Mono Pirun; Michael C Zody; Simon White; Ewan Birney; Stephen Searle; Jeremy Schmutz; Jane Grimwood; Mark C Dickson; Richard M Myers; Craig T Miller; Brian R Summers; Anne K Knecht; Shannon D Brady; Haili Zhang; Alex A Pollen; Timothy Howes; Chris Amemiya; Jen Baldwin; Toby Bloom; David B Jaffe; Robert Nicol; Jane Wilkinson; Eric S Lander; Federica Di Palma; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; David M Kingsley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  16 in total

1.  Role of sexual imprinting in assortative mating and premating isolation in Darwin's finches.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The Genetics of Mating Song Evolution Underlying Rapid Speciation: Linking Quantitative Variation to Candidate Genes for Behavioral Isolation.

Authors:  Mingzi Xu; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genetic coupling of signal and preference facilitates sexual isolation during rapid speciation.

Authors:  Mingzi Xu; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Imbalanced segregation of recombinant haplotypes in hybrid populations reveals inter- and intrachromosomal Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities.

Authors:  Juan Li; Molly Schumer; Claudia Bank
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Heterosis counteracts hybrid breakdown to forestall speciation by parallel natural selection.

Authors:  Ken A Thompson; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Light environment influences mating behaviours during the early stages of divergence in tropical butterflies.

Authors:  Alexander E Hausmann; Chi-Yun Kuo; Marília Freire; Nicol Rueda-M; Mauricio Linares; Carolina Pardo-Diaz; Camilo Salazar; Richard M Merrill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Genes and Disease Resistance in Fish.

Authors:  Takuya Yamaguchi; Johannes M Dijkstra
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Genetic dissection of assortative mating behavior.

Authors:  Richard M Merrill; Pasi Rastas; Simon H Martin; Maria C Melo; Sarah Barker; John Davey; W Owen McMillan; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Female Choice Undermines the Emergence of Strong Sexual Isolation between Locally Adapted Populations of Atlantic Mollies (Poecilia mexicana).

Authors:  Claudia Zimmer; Rüdiger Riesch; Jonas Jourdan; David Bierbach; Lenin Arias-Rodriguez; Martin Plath
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Chemical signals act as the main reproductive barrier between sister and mimetic Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  M F González-Rojas; K Darragh; J Robles; M Linares; S Schulz; W O McMillan; C D Jiggins; C Pardo-Diaz; C Salazar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.