Literature DB >> 17032269

Towards unbiased parentage assignment: combining genetic, behavioural and spatial data in a Bayesian framework.

J D Hadfield1, D S Richardson, T Burke.   

Abstract

Inferring the parentage of a sample of individuals is often a prerequisite for many types of analysis in molecular ecology, evolutionary biology and quantitative genetics. In all but a few cases, the method of parentage assignment is divorced from the methods used to estimate the parameters of primary interest, such as mate choice or heritability. Here we present a Bayesian approach that simultaneously estimates the parentage of a sample of individuals and a wide range of population-level parameters in which we are interested. We show that joint estimation of parentage and population-level parameters increases the power of parentage assignment, reduces bias in parameter estimation, and accurately evaluates uncertainty in both. We illustrate the method by analysing a number of simulated test data sets, and through a re-analysis of parentage in the Seychelles warbler, Acrocephalus sechellensis. A combination of behavioural, spatial and genetic data are used in the analyses and, importantly, the method does not require strong prior information about the relationship between nongenetic data and parentage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17032269     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03050.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  80 in total

1.  Computationally efficient sibship and parentage assignment from multilocus marker data.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Positive density-dependent reproduction regulated by local kinship and size in an understorey tropical tree.

Authors:  Antonio R Castilla; Nathaniel Pope; Shalene Jha
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of allelic dropout and false allele error rates from microsatellite genotypes in the absence of reference data.

Authors:  Paul C D Johnson; Daniel T Haydon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Inbreeding load and inbreeding depression estimated from lifetime reproductive success in a small, dispersal-limited population.

Authors:  Janna R Willoughby; Peter M Waser; Anna Brüniche-Olsen; Mark R Christie
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 5.  Wild pedigrees: the way forward.

Authors:  J M Pemberton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Life history trade-offs at a single locus maintain sexually selected genetic variation.

Authors:  Susan E Johnston; Jacob Gratten; Camillo Berenos; Jill G Pilkington; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Josephine M Pemberton; Jon Slate
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  PRIMUS: rapid reconstruction of pedigrees from genome-wide estimates of identity by descent.

Authors:  Jeffrey Staples; Dandi Qiao; Michael H Cho; Edwin K Silverman; Deborah A Nickerson; Jennifer E Below
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Software for quantifying and simulating microsatellite genotyping error.

Authors:  Paul C D Johnson; Daniel T Haydon
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2009-11-24

9.  An agglomerative hierarchical approach to visualization in Bayesian clustering problems.

Authors:  K J Dawson; K Belkhir
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  FRANz: reconstruction of wild multi-generation pedigrees.

Authors:  Markus Riester; Peter F Stadler; Konstantin Klemm
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.