Literature DB >> 23617922

Experimental confirmation that body size determines mate preference via phenotype matching in a stickleback species pair.

Gina L Conte1, Dolph Schluter.   

Abstract

Mate choice by phenotype matching, whereby individuals prefer a mate whose phenotype is similar to their own, should facilitate speciation with gene flow. This is because the genes that control mate signal (the phenotype being matched) also determine the preferred mate signal ("mate preference"). Speciation is made even easier if phenotype matching is based on a trait under divergent natural selection. In this case, assortative mating should readily evolve as a byproduct of divergent selection on the trait. Previous observational studies of assortative mating between sympatric, hybridizing threespine stickleback species (Gasterosteus aculeatus complex) suggested that phenotype matching might occur by body size, a trait under divergent natural selection. To test this, we used experimental manipulation of body size to rule out the effects of confounding variables. We found that size-manipulated benthic and limnetic stickleback females prefer mates whose body size more closely matches their own. It is thus likely that assortative mating by phenotype matching has facilitated the origin and persistence of benthic and limnetic threespine sticklebacks in the face of gene flow.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23617922     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  12 in total

1.  The ecological stage changes benefits of mate choice and drives preference divergence.

Authors:  Robin M Tinghitella; Alycia C R Lackey; Catherine Durso; Jennifer A H Koop; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Parallel changes in gut microbiome composition and function during colonization, local adaptation and ecological speciation.

Authors:  Diana J Rennison; Seth M Rudman; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Assortative mating enhances postzygotic barriers to gene flow via ancestry bundling.

Authors:  Pavitra Muralidhar; Graham Coop; Carl Veller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Heterosis counteracts hybrid breakdown to forestall speciation by parallel natural selection.

Authors:  Ken A Thompson; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Genetic Coupling of Female Mate Choice with Polygenic Ecological Divergence Facilitates Stickleback Speciation.

Authors:  Rachael A Bay; Matthew E Arnegard; Gina L Conte; Jacob Best; Nicole L Bedford; Shaugnessy R McCann; Matthew E Dubin; Yingguang Frank Chan; Felicity C Jones; David M Kingsley; Dolph Schluter; Catherine L Peichel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Genetic basis for body size variation between an anadromous and two derived lacustrine populations of threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus in southwest Alaska.

Authors:  Ella Bowles; Rebecca A Johnston; Stevi L Vanderzwan; Sean M Rogers
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.624

7.  Female mate preferences for male body size and shape promote sexual isolation in threespine sticklebacks.

Authors:  Megan L Head; Genevieve M Kozak; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Widespread positive but weak assortative mating by diet within stickleback populations.

Authors:  Travis Ingram; Yuexin Jiang; Racine Rangel; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Divergent warning patterns contribute to assortative mating between incipient Heliconius species.

Authors:  Richard M Merrill; Audrey Chia; Nicola J Nadeau
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Genetic and morphometric divergence in threespine stickleback in the Chignik catchment, Alaska.

Authors:  Annette Taugbøl; Claudia Junge; Thomas P Quinn; Anders Herland; Leif Asbjørn Vøllestad
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.