Literature DB >> 22066935

A framework for comparing processes of speciation in the presence of gene flow.

Carole M Smadja1, Roger K Butlin.   

Abstract

How common is speciation-with-gene-flow? How much does gene flow impact on speciation? To answer questions like these requires understanding of the common obstacles to evolving reproductive isolation in the face of gene flow and the factors that favour this crucial step. We provide a common framework for the ways in which gene flow opposes speciation and the potential conditions that may ease divergence. This framework is centred on the challenge shared by most scenarios of speciation-with-gene-flow, i.e. the need for coupling among different components of reproductive isolation. Using this structure, we review and compare the factors favouring speciation with the intention of providing a more integrated picture of speciation-with-gene-flow.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22066935     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05350.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  83 in total

1.  Evolution of mate choice and the so-called magic traits in ecological speciation.

Authors:  Xavier Thibert-Plante; Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  Rapid experimental evolution of reproductive isolation from a single natural population.

Authors:  Scott M Villa; Juan C Altuna; James S Ruff; Andrew B Beach; Lane I Mulvey; Erik J Poole; Heidi E Campbell; Kevin P Johnson; Michael D Shapiro; Sarah E Bush; Dale H Clayton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Is homoploid hybrid speciation that rare? An empiricist's view.

Authors:  G Nieto Feliner; I Álvarez; J Fuertes-Aguilar; M Heuertz; I Marques; F Moharrek; R Piñeiro; R Riina; J A Rosselló; P S Soltis; I Villa-Machío
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 4.  Making sense of genomic islands of differentiation in light of speciation.

Authors:  Jochen B W Wolf; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Disruptive ecological selection on a mating cue.

Authors:  Richard M Merrill; Richard W R Wallbank; Vanessa Bull; Patricio C A Salazar; James Mallet; Martin Stevens; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Contemporary and future studies in plant speciation, morphological/floral evolution and polyploidy: honouring the scientific contributions of Leslie D. Gottlieb to plant evolutionary biology.

Authors:  Daniel J Crawford; Jeffrey J Doyle; Douglas E Soltis; Pamela S Soltis; Jonathan F Wendel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Divergence with gene flow within the recent chipmunk radiation (Tamias).

Authors:  J Sullivan; J R Demboski; K C Bell; S Hird; B Sarver; N Reid; J M Good
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Genome-wide patterns of divergence and introgression after secondary contact between Pungitius sticklebacks.

Authors:  Yo Y Yamasaki; Ryo Kakioka; Hiroshi Takahashi; Atsushi Toyoda; Atsushi J Nagano; Yoshiyasu Machida; Peter R Møller; Jun Kitano
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  The ecological stage changes benefits of mate choice and drives preference divergence.

Authors:  Robin M Tinghitella; Alycia C R Lackey; Catherine Durso; Jennifer A H Koop; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Identifying loci under selection against gene flow in isolation-with-migration models.

Authors:  Vitor C Sousa; Miguel Carneiro; Nuno Ferrand; Jody Hey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.