Literature DB >> 35649920

Cat-astrophic effects of sudden interruptions on spatial auditory attention.

Wusheng Liang1, Christopher A Brown2, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham3.   

Abstract

Salient interruptions draw attention involuntarily. Here, we explored whether this effect depends on the spatial and temporal relationships between a target stream and interrupter. In a series of online experiments, listeners focused spatial attention on a target stream of spoken syllables in the presence of an otherwise identical distractor stream from the opposite hemifield. On some random trials, an interrupter (a cat "MEOW") occurred. Experiment 1 established that the interrupter, which occurred randomly in 25% of the trials in the hemifield opposite the target, degraded target recall. Moreover, a majority of participants exhibited this degradation for the first target syllable, which finished before the interrupter began. Experiment 2 showed that the effect of an interrupter was similar whether it occurred in the opposite or the same hemifield as the target. Experiment 3 found that the interrupter degraded performance slightly if it occurred before the target stream began but had no effect if it began after the target stream ended. Experiment 4 showed decreased interruption effects when the interruption frequency increased (50% of the trials). These results demonstrate that a salient interrupter disrupts recall of a target stream, regardless of its direction, especially if it occurs during a target stream.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35649920      PMCID: PMC9113758          DOI: 10.1121/10.0010453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  45 in total

1.  Auditory attention strategy depends on target linguistic properties and spatial configuration.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The time it takes to switch attention.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

3.  Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier; Jane V Elsley; Pilar Andrés; Francisco Barceló
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-03-05

4.  The attentional blink.

Authors:  K L Shapiro; J E Raymond; K M Arnell
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Auditory attention and the representation of spatial information.

Authors:  G Rhodes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-07

Review 6.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  The effect of inattention on form perception.

Authors:  I Rock; D Gutman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Talker discontinuity disrupts attention to speech: Evidence from EEG and pupillometry.

Authors:  Sung-Joo Lim; Yaminah D Carter; J Michelle Njoroge; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.781

9.  Investigating bottom-up auditory attention.

Authors:  Emine Merve Kaya; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Push-pull competition between bottom-up and top-down auditory attention to natural soundscapes.

Authors:  Nicholas Huang; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.