Literature DB >> 22836598

Out-of-field dose measurements in a water phantom using different radiotherapy modalities.

R Kaderka1, D Schardt, M Durante, T Berger, U Ramm, J Licher, C La Tessa.   

Abstract

This investigation focused on the characterization of the lateral dose fall-off following the irradiation of the target with photons, protons and carbon ions. A water phantom was irradiated with a rectangular field using photons, passively delivered protons as well as scanned protons and carbon ions. The lateral dose profile in the depth of the maximum dose was measured using an ion chamber, a diamond detector and thermoluminescence detectors TLD-600 and TLD-700. The yield of thermal neutrons was estimated for all radiation types while their complete spectrum was measured with bubble detectors during the irradiation with photons. The peripheral dose delivered by photons is significantly higher compared to both protons and carbon ions and exceeds the latter by up to two orders of magnitude at distances greater than 50 mm from the field. The comparison of passive and active delivery techniques for protons shows that, for the chosen rectangular target shape, the former has a sharper penumbra whereas the latter has a lower dose in the far-out-of-field region. When comparing scanning treatments, carbon ions present a sharper dose fall-off than protons close to the target but increasing peripheral dose with increasing incident energy. For photon irradiation, the contribution to the out-of-field dose of photoneutrons appears to be of the same order of magnitude as the scattered primary beam. Charged particles show a clear supremacy over x-rays in achieving a higher dose conformality around the target and in sparing the healthy tissue from unnecessary radiation exposure. The out-of-field dose for x-rays increases with increasing beam energy because of the production of biologically harmful neutrons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22836598     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/16/5059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  Monte Carlo and analytical model predictions of leakage neutron exposures from passively scattered proton therapy.

Authors:  Angélica Pérez-Andújar; Rui Zhang; Wayne Newhauser
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A simple and fast physics-based analytical method to calculate therapeutic and stray doses from external beam, megavoltage x-ray therapy.

Authors:  Lydia J Jagetic; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Proton therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current knowledges and future perspectives.

Authors:  Gyu Sang Yoo; Jeong Il Yu; Hee Chul Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Comparative Risk Predictions of Second Cancers After Carbon-Ion Therapy Versus Proton Therapy.

Authors:  John G Eley; Thomas Friedrich; Kenneth L Homann; Rebecca M Howell; Michael Scholz; Marco Durante; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Measurement and modeling of out-of-field doses from various advanced post-mastectomy radiotherapy techniques.

Authors:  Jihyung Yoon; David Heins; Xiaodong Zhao; Mary Sanders; Rui Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Analytical model for out-of-field dose in photon craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Wassim Jalbout; Rebecca M Howell; Nabil Khater; Fady Geara; Kenneth Homann; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Charged particle therapy--optimization, challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Jay S Loeffler; Marco Durante
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Variation of 4 MV X-ray dose rate strongly impacts biological response both in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  M Ben Kacem; M A Benadjaoud; M Dos Santos; F Soysouvanh; V Buard; G Tarlet; B Le Guen; A François; O Guipaud; F Milliat; V Paget
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Peripheral dose measurements with diode and thermoluminescence dosimeters for intensity modulated radiotherapy delivered with conventional and un-conventional linear accelerator.

Authors:  Rajesh Kinhikar; Poonam Gamre; Chandrashekhar Tambe; Sudarshan Kadam; George Biju; C S Magai; Dipak Dhote; Shyam Shrivastava; Deepak Deshpande
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2013-01

10.  Accuracy and sources of error of out-of field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system for intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; David S Followill; Xin A Wang; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.