Literature DB >> 1461205

Uncertainty analysis of absorbed dose calculations from thermoluminescence dosimeters.

T H Kirby1, W F Hanson, D A Johnston.   

Abstract

Thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLD) are widely used to verify absorbed doses delivered from radiation therapy beams. Specifically, they are used by the Radiological Physics Center for mailed dosimetry for verification of therapy machine output. The effects of the random experimental uncertainties of various factors on dose calculations from TLD signals are examined, including: fading, dose response nonlinearity, and energy response corrections; reproducibility of TL signal measurements and TLD reader calibration. Individual uncertainties are combined to estimate the total uncertainty due to random fluctuations. The Radiological Physics Center's (RPC) mail out TLD system, utilizing throwaway LiF powder to monitor high-energy photon and electron beam outputs, is analyzed in detail. The technique may also be applicable to other TLD systems. It is shown that statements of +/- 2% dose uncertainty and +/- 5% action criterion for TLD dosimetry are reasonable when related to uncertainties in the dose calculations, provided the standard deviation (s.d.) of TL readings is 1.5% or better.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1461205     DOI: 10.1118/1.596797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  43 in total

1.  Methodology for determining doses to in-field, out-of-field and partially in-field organs for late effects studies in photon radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rebecca M Howell; Sarah B Scarboro; Phillip J Taddei; Sunil Krishnan; Stephen F Kry; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system.

Authors:  Rebecca M Howell; Sarah B Scarboro; S F Kry; Derek Z Yaldo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Effect of organ size and position on out-of-field dose distributions during radiation therapy.

Authors:  Sarah B Scarboro; Marilyn Stovall; Allen White; Susan A Smith; Derek Yaldo; Stephen F Kry; Rebecca M Howell
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Clinical characterization of a proton beam continuous uniform scanning system with dose layer stacking.

Authors:  J B Farr; A E Mascia; W C Hsi; C E Allgower; F Jesseph; A N Schreuder; M Wolanski; D F Nichiporov; V Anferov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Technical note: Heterogeneity dose calculation accuracy in IMRT: study of five commercial treatment planning systems using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom.

Authors:  Scott E Davidson; Richard A Popple; Geoffrey S Ibbott; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Development and implementation of a remote audit tool for high dose rate (HDR) Ir-192 brachytherapy using optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry.

Authors:  Kevin E Casey; Paola Alvarez; Stephen F Kry; Rebecca M Howell; Ann Lawyer; David Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Angular dependence of the nanoDot OSL dosimeter.

Authors:  James R Kerns; Stephen F Kry; Narayan Sahoo; David S Followill; Geoffrey S Ibbott
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Variations in photon energy spectra of a 6 MV beam and their impact on TLD response.

Authors:  Sarah B Scarboro; David S Followill; Rebecca M Howell; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Treatment Planning System Calculation Errors Are Present in Most Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core-Houston Phantom Failures.

Authors:  James R Kerns; Francesco Stingo; David S Followill; Rebecca M Howell; Adam Melancon; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Analytical model for out-of-field dose in photon craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Phillip J Taddei; Wassim Jalbout; Rebecca M Howell; Nabil Khater; Fady Geara; Kenneth Homann; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.