Literature DB >> 31883811

Cortical Interactions between Prosthetic and Natural Vision.

Tamar Arens-Arad1, Nairouz Farah1, Rivkah Lender1, Avital Moshkovitz1, Thomas Flores2, Daniel Palanker3, Yossi Mandel4.   

Abstract

Outer retinal degenerative diseases, such as retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD), are among the leading causes of incurable blindness in the Western world [1]. Retinal prostheses have been shown to restore some useful vision by electrically stimulating the remaining retinal neurons [2]. In contrast to inherited retinal degenerative diseases (e.g., RP), typically leading to a complete loss of the visual field, in AMD patients the disease is localized to the macula, leaving the peripheral vision intact. Implanting a retinal prosthesis in the central macula in AMD patients [3, 4] leads to an intriguing situation where the patient's central retina is stimulated electrically, whereas the peripheral healthy retina responds to natural light stimulation. An important question is whether the visual cortex responds to these two concurrent stimuli similarly to the interaction between two adjacent natural light stimuli projected onto healthy retina. Here, we investigated the cortical interactions between prosthetic and natural vision based on visually evoked potentials (VEPs) recorded in rats implanted with photovoltaic subretinal implants. Using this model, where prosthetic and natural vision information are combined in the visual cortex, we observed striking similarities in the interactions of natural and prosthetic vision, including similar effect of background illumination, linear summation of non-patterned stimuli, and lateral inhibition with spatial patterns [5], which increased with target contrast. These results support the idea of combined prosthetic and natural vision in restoration of sight for AMD patients.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31883811      PMCID: PMC8019584          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  43 in total

1.  Retina versus cortex; contrast adaptation in parallel visual pathways.

Authors:  Stephen A Baccus; Markus Meister
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits.

Authors:  Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold.

Authors:  U Polat; K Mizobe; M W Pettet; T Kasamatsu; A M Norcia
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-05       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Partial deafness cochlear implantation at the University of Kansas: techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Sandra Prentiss; Kevin Sykes; Hinrich Staecker
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of retinal response to network-mediated photovoltaic stimulation.

Authors:  Elton Ho; Richard Smith; Georges Goetz; Xin Lei; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore I Kamins; James Harris; Keith Mathieson; Daniel Palanker; Alexander Sher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Development of Animal Models of Local Retinal Degeneration.

Authors:  Henri Lorach; Jennifer Kung; Corinne Beier; Yossi Mandel; Roopa Dalal; Philip Huie; Jenny Wang; Seungjun Lee; Alexander Sher; Bryan William Jones; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wan Ling Wong; Xinyi Su; Xiang Li; Chui Ming G Cheung; Ronald Klein; Ching-Yu Cheng; Tien Yin Wong
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 26.763

8.  The visual physiology of the wild type mouse determined with pattern VEPs.

Authors:  V Porciatti; T Pizzorusso; L Maffei
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Head mounted DMD based projection system for natural and prosthetic visual stimulation in freely moving rats.

Authors:  Tamar Arens-Arad; Nairouz Farah; Shai Ben-Yaish; Alex Zlotnik; Zeev Zalevsky; Yossi Mandel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Restoring visual function to the blind retina with a potent, safe and long-lasting photoswitch.

Authors:  Ivan Tochitsky; Jay Trautman; Nicholas Gallerani; Jonatan G Malis; Richard H Kramer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Monika Fleckenstein; Tiarnán D L Keenan; Robyn H Guymer; Usha Chakravarthy; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Caroline C Klaver; Wai T Wong; Emily Y Chew
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 52.329

2.  In vivo optogenetic stimulation of the primate retina activates the visual cortex after long-term transduction.

Authors:  Antoine Chaffiol; Matthieu Provansal; Corentin Joffrois; Kévin Blaize; Guillaume Labernede; Ruben Goulet; Emma Burban; Elena Brazhnikova; Jens Duebel; Pierre Pouget; José Alain Sahel; Serge Picaud; Fabrice Arcizet; Gregory Gauvain
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 6.698

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.