| Literature DB >> 29038615 |
Ning Li1,2,3, Heng Zhou1,2,3, Qizhu Tang1,2,3.
Abstract
The red blood cell distribution width (RDW) obtained from a standard complete blood count (CBC) is a convenient and inexpensive biochemical parameter representing the variability in size of circulating erythrocytes. Over the past few decades, RDW with mean corpuscular volume (MCV) has been used to identify quite a few hematological system diseases including iron-deficiency anemia and bone marrow dysfunction. In recent years, many clinical studies have proved that the alterations of RDW levels may be associated with the incidence and prognosis in many cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (CVDs). Therefore, early detection and intervention in time of these vascular diseases is critical for delaying their progression. RDW as a new predictive marker and an independent risk factor plays a significant role in assessing the severity and progression of CVDs. However, the mechanisms of the association between RDW and the prognosis of CVDs remain unclear. In this review, we will provide an overview of the representative literatures concerning hypothetical and potential epidemiological associations between RDW and CVDs and discuss the underlying mechanisms.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29038615 PMCID: PMC5606102 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7089493
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Physiological conditions that lead to alteration of RDW values.
| RDW values | Normal | Elevated |
|---|---|---|
| Decreased MCV | (i) Anemia of chronic disease
| (i) Iron deficiency
|
| Elevated MCV | (i) Chronic liver disease
| (i) Vitamin B12, folate deficiency
|
| Normal MCV | (i) Anemia of chronic disease
| (i) Early vitamin B12, folate deficiency
|
Figure 1RBCs volume normal distribution curve from an impedance-based hematology analyzer and relative variation in the RBC distribution width (RDW) [40].
Figure 22 common methods to calculate the red blood cell distribution width (RDW) [41].
Studies exploring association between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and heart failure (HF).
| First author, journal, year | Study design | Study population | Mean follow-up | Major outcomes | Major limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (i) Felker et al. [ | Retrospective cohort | 2679 symptomatic chronic heart failure patients, mean age ≥ 60 years | A median of 34 months | HR for morbidity and mortality (1 SD increment of RDW): 1.17 (95% CI, 1.03–1.20) | (i) Not provide a formal evaluation
|
| (i) Allen et al. [ | Prospective, multicenter cohort | 1016 heart failure patients, age 64 ± 14 years | At least 2 years | HR for hospitalization or mortality (1 SD increment of RDW): 1.06 (95% CI, 1.02–1.10) | (i) The mean follow-up was short at 1 year
|
| (i) Borné et al. [ | Population-based cohort study | 26,784 subjects, age 45–73 years, without history of heart failure, stroke or myocardial infarction | A mean of 15 years | HR for heart failure in the top quartile of RDW (1 SD increment of RDW): 1.47 (95% CI: 1.14–1.89) | (i) Lack of information on type and cause of heart failure
|
| (i) Celik et al. [ | Cross-sectional study | 71 diastolic heart failure, age 57.09 ± 7.43 years and 50 control, age 56 ± 7 years | — | RDW > 13.6% and NT-proBNP > 125 pg/mL have high diagnostic accuracy in diastolic heart failure patients | (i) The sample size was relatively small
|
| (i) Dai et al. [ | Prospective cohort | 521 patients with acute congestive heart failure, mean age ≥ 60 years | A mean of 24 months | Higher RDW values in acute congestive heart failure patients at admission were more prognostically relevant than Hgb levels | (i) The sample size was relatively small
|
| (i) Mawlana et al. [ | Cross-sectional study | 31 children with heart failure, mean age 16.16 ± 14.97 months | — | RDW level was significantly related to hemoglobin level ( | (i) The sample size was relatively small
|
| (i) Al-Najjar et al. [ | Prospective cohort | 1087 patients referred to a community
| 52 months | Both RDW and NT-proBNP were independent prognostic (RDW: chi square 21.8 versus 49.1 both | (i) Predictive power was examined only at a single time point
|
| (i) Rudresh and Vivek [ | Cross-sectional study | 70 heart failure patients, age 54. 86 ± 11.75 years and 30 control, age 52.03 ± 13.21 years | — | The mean RDW in patient was 15.763 ± 2.609 and in controls was 13.17 ± 0.75, respectively | (i) Not ensure that RDW is independent of EPO levels |
| (i) Sotiropoulos et al. [ | Prospective cohort | 402 acute heart failure without acute coronary syndrome, age 64–86 years | 1 year | (i) All-causemortality of all patients increased with quartiles of rising RDW (chi square 18; | (i) Without consideration of cardiovascular mortality or rehospitalization rate
|
| (i) Liu et al. [ | Retrospective analysis | 179 chronic heart failure patients with different NYHA class, age 49–83 years | — | RDW increased significantly in class III and IV compared with class I (14.3 ± 2.3% and 14.3 ± 1.7% versus 12.9 ± 0.8%, | (i) Only in-hospital baseline data were collected
|
Studies exploring association between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and myocardial infarction (MI).
| First author, journal, year | Study design | Study population | Mean follow-up | Major outcomes | Major limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (i) Tonelli et al. [ | Post hoc analysis | 4111 participants with hyperlipidemia and a history of myocardial infarction, age 21–75 years | A median of 59.7 months | The top RDW quartile had a 56% increased risk of fatal coronary disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction when compared to subjects in the lowest quartile (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.17–2.08) | (i) Not rule out the possibility of residual confounding
|
| (i) Chen et al. [ | Prospective cohort | 3226 participants without history of stroke, coronary heart disease, or cancer, age>35 years | A median of 15.9 years | The highest RDW quartile was 1.46 for all-cause mortality compared with the lowest quartile (95% CI: 1.17–1.81) | (i) Few cases met the anemia criteria, which resulted in fairly wide confidence intervals
|
| (i) Zalawadiya et al. [ | Multiethnic cohort | 7556 participants, age 41.5–15.8 years | 10 years | The risk of being classified in the intermediate risk category of coronary heart disease was 53% greater (95% CI: 1.38–1.69, | (i) Actual cardiovascular events during a set follow-up period was unavailable |
| (i) Lee et al. [ | Retrospective analysis | 1596 patients with acute myocardial infarction, mean age, 64.5 ± 11.9 years | 1634 ± 342 days | The RDW levels were significantly higher in patients with 12-month major adverse cardiac events (13.8 ± 1.3% versus 13.3 ± 1.2%, | (i) Cannot exclude the possibility of residual confounding factors
|
| (i) Arbel et al. [ | Registry-based, retrospective cohort | 225,006 subjects from health registry, age ≥ 40 years | 5 years | Compared to patients with a RDW of 13% or lower, patients with RDW > 17% had a HR of 3.83 (95% CI: 3.12–4.69, | (i) Not rule out the possibility of residual confounding
|
| (i) Skjelbakken et al. [ | Prospective cohort | 25,612 participants with no previous myocardial infarction, mean age 40.2–52.8 years | 15.8 years | There was a linear association between RDW and risk of myocardial infarction, for which a 1% increment in RDW was associated with a 13% increased risk (HR 1.13; 95% CI: 1.07–1.19) | (i) The RDW measure was not repeated, there remained random measurement error
|
| (i) Sun et al. [ | Prospective cohort | 691 patients with STEMI, free of heart failure | 41.8 months | High RDW was associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 3.43; 95% CI: 1.17–8.32; | (i) Not rule out the possibility of residual confounding
|
| (i) Sahin et al. [ | Cross-sectional study | 335 patients with NSTEMI, age 50–79 years | A median of 18 ± 11 months | The RDW levels of patients were significantly higher in the high SYNTAX group than in the low SYNTAX group (15.2 ± 1.8 versus 14.2 ± 1.2, | (i) The sample size was relatively small
|
| (i) Sahin et al. [ | Cross-sectional study | 251 adult patients with NSTEMI over a 1-year period, age >50 years | — | The RDW was higher in the group with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction compared with the patient group with unstable angina (14.6 ± 1.0 versus 13.06 ± 1.7, resp., | (i) The sample size was relatively small
|
Studies exploring association between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and coronary atherosclerosis.
| First author, journal, year | Study design | Study population | Mean follow-up | Major outcomes | Major limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (i) Yalçin et al. [ | Cross-sectional and observational study | 296 stable eligible patients, 71% (mean age 61 ± 11 years) of them had coronary artery disease and 29% (mean age 52 ± 11 years) of them had normal coronary arteries | — | Red blood cell distribution width values were significantly different among the subgroups determined for the severity and extent of coronary artery disease | (i) The sample size was relatively small
|
| (i) Çelik et al. [ | Retrospective analysis | 572 patients without coronary artery disease history | — | (i) RDW was found to be higher in patients with critical stenosis, than those without (13.63 ± 1.28 versus 14.31 ± 1.58, | (i) No follow-up of the patient
|
| (i) Chaikriangkrai et al. [ | Cross-sectional study | 832 patients without known coronary artery disease who presented with acute chest pain, age > 18 years | 10 | No association between RDW and coronary calcification presence or severity | (i) Causal relationship cannot be established from this study design
|
Studies exploring association between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and atrial fibrillation (AF).
| First author, journal, year | Study design | Study population | Mean follow-up | Major outcomes | Major limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (i) Adamsson et al. [ | Prospective cohort study | 27,124 subjects from the general population with no history of atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, heart failure or stroke. Age 45–73 years | 13.6 years | HR for incidence of atrial fibrillation was 1.33 (95% CI 1.16–1.53) for the fourth versus first quartile of RDW ( | (i) The study did not have information on HbA1c and lipid levels for the entire cohort
|
| (i) Chaikriangkrai et al. [ | Retrospective analysis | (i) 63 hypertensive patients with atrial fibrillation, age 71.09 ± 8.50 years
| — | RDW level was different among patients with atrial fibrillation and without atrial fibrillation (15.13 ± 1.58 and 14.05 ± 1.15, | (i) The sample size was relatively small
|
| (i) Güngör et al. [ | Retrospective study | 117 non-valvular AF patients including 103 paroxysmal and 14 chronic atrial fibrillation, aged > 18 years | — | RDW (OR 4.18, 95% CI: 2.15–8.15; | (i) The study population was small
|
| (i) Gurses et al. [ | Prospective study | 299 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation despite ≥1 antiarrhythmic drug(s), age 55.40 ± 10.60 years | 24 months | (i) Patients with late atrial fibrillation recurrence had higher RDW levels (14.30 ± 0.93 versus 13.52 ± 0.93%, | (i) The study population was small
|
| (i) Chaikriangkrai et al. [ | Pilot study | 109 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, age 66.9 ± 9.5 years | — | RDW was the only independent predictor of postoperative atrial fibrillation (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.078–1.994; | (i) The study population was small
|
| (i) Korantzopoulos and Liu [ | Retrospective study | 101 patients with symptomatic SSS undergoing dual-chamberpacemaker implantation, median age 77 years | — | Left atrial diameter was increased in tachy-brady patients (44 mm versus 39 mm; | (i) The study population was small
|
Studies exploring association between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and primary hypertension.
| First author, journal, year | Study design | Study population | Mean follow-up | Major outcomes | Major limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (i) Tanindi et al. [ | Cross-sectional and observational study | 128 patients with hypertension, 74 patients with prehypertension and 36 healthy controls, age >18 years | — | (i) Mean RDW values were 15.26 ± 0.82, 16.54 ± 0.91 and 13.87 ± 0.94 in prehypertensive, hypertensive and control groups, respectively ( | (i) The sample size was relatively small
|
| (i) Sen-Yu et al. [ | Retrospective study | 149 pregnancies with pregnancy hypertension disease and 70 health pregnant women as controls, age>18 years | 10 months | RDW in different gestational time (20th week, 24th week, 28th week) of different pregnant women groups had differences ( | (i) The sample size was relatively small
|
| (i) Reddy et al. [ | Cross-sectional and observational study | 200 patients and 100 controls, age >50 years | — | Hs-CRP levels and RDW levels are both equally effective as a predictive marker for hypertension | (i) No further statistical analysis
|
| (i) Su et al. [ | Cross-sectional study | 708 patients with essential hypertension, age 18–90 years | — | There was significantly increased RDW in reverse dippers (13.52 ± 1.05) than dippers (13.25 ± 0.85) of hypertension ( | (i) There was no a longer period of prospective observation providing more prognostic information
|
| (i) Özcan et al. [ | Cross-sectional study | (i) 127 dipper patients, mean age, 52 ± 12 years
| — | Nondippers had significantly higher RDW levels than dippers (14.6 versus 13.0, | (i) It just represented a single-center experience
|
Studies exploring association between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and carotid atherosclerosis and stroke.
| First author, journal, year | Study design | Study population | Mean follow-up | Major outcomes | Major limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (i) Wen et al. [ | Cross-sectional study | 156 hypertensive inpatients, age 60–85 years | — | A high baseline RDW was observed in patients with an increased IMT/ID ratio (95% CI: 4.54–28.59; | The sample size was relatively small |
| (i) Kaya et al. [ | Prospective study | 153 patients with heart failure, age 56–76 years | 1 year | An RDW ≥ 15.2% measured on admission had 87% sensitivity and 74% specificity in predicting stroke in patients with heart failure (area under the curve: 0.923, 95% CI: 0.852–0.994, | (i) The sample size was relatively small
|
| (i) Wonnerth et al. [ | Prospective, single-center, cross-sectional cohort | 1286 patients with neurological asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis | A median of 6.2 years | HR (1-SD increment of RDW) was 1.39 (95% CI: 1.27–1.53; | (i) Data deriving from a post-hoc analysis of a prospective single-centerinvestigation, possible explanations for RDW variations cannot be addressed
|
| (i) Vijayashree et al. [ | Retrospective cross-sectional study | 236 patients hospitalized at the neurology ward, age 18–55 years | — | The mean RDW values of young patients with stroke were significantly higher than patients with epilepsy or multiple sclerosis (14.9 ± 1.2, 13.3 ± 1.2, 13.4 ± 0.6, | (i) The study was carried out in only one center
|
| (i) Söderholm et al. [ | Population-based cohort study | 26,879 participants without history of coronary events or stroke | A mean of 15.2 years | (i) Incidences of total cerebral infarction ( | (i) The numbers of intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage cases were considerably lower
|
| (i) Güçlü et al. [ | Post hoc analysis | (i) 30 healthy controls, age 52.76 ± 13.57 years
| — | The RDW value was higher in the predialysis group than controls with a trend to statistical significance ( | (i) The sample size was relatively small
|
| (i) Lappegård et al. [ | A single-center prospective, population-based study | 25,992 participants, age > 25 years | A mean of 15.8 years | HR for higher risk of stroke (1-SD increment of RDW): 1.13 (95% CI, 1.07–1.20) | (i) There was only one measurement of RDW throughout the study period
|
| (i) Ren et al. [ | Cross-sectional study | 803 patients with metabolic syndrome undergoing carotid ultrasonography examination, age 24 to 54 years | — | Compared with the first quartile, people with third and fourth quartile level gave obvious higher risk of carotid artery atherosclerotic trend (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.01–197; OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.30–3.40) | (i) The cross-sectional design limits the causal relationship between RDW and carotid intimal-medial thickness
|
Figure 3Pathophysiological process of RDW in CVDs.